Would you?

[afrcnqueen]

I don't know if this thread exists. I was reading a friend's FB page and he occasionally posts "What if?" " Would you? types of questions to see the responses he gets.
Here is one of the questions I am stealing from him to see what everyone thinks or what the responses will be. This is to be fun :-)

The question is: To achieve world peace, would you let your significant other/ spouse sleep with your worst enemy?


My initial response was Hell Nooo screw the world!!! then I thought more on it and my answer still stands..lmao

[MrSunshine]

Unfortunately, that would cause world destruction. It would be fun to watch, however.

If it were even possible to achieve world peace with a "piece", I would certainly be in fucking wonderland now.

[SleepyButch]

I don't know if this thread exists. I was reading a friend's FB page and he occasionally posts "What if?" " Would you? types of questions to see the responses he gets.
Here is one of the questions I am stealing from him to see what everyone thinks or what the responses will be. This is to be fun :-)

The question is: To achieve world peace, would you let your significant other/ spouse sleep with your worst enemy?


My initial response was Hell Nooo screw the world!!! then I thought more on it and my answer still stands..lmao


I'd have to do a little bargaining and have that world peace include no more animal cruelty of any kind ever. If the person/people/being I was bargaining with agreed, I would leave that decision up to my partner/significant other as ultimately it would be her choice and not mine.

[Blade]

NO, I'm afraid that would eventually cause me to show my redneck ass and then there would be NO PEACE at all. I don't share well for any reason.

[Gemme]

Okay, this is how it would go.

We'd negotiate until all parties are satisfied and then a date would be set. My partner would have a special treat for ye ole enemy and when she wasn't looking, he'd rufie her drink, take a bunch of saucy looking pics, rough up the room a little and while she slept he and I would get busy.

Gotta have that fresh frolicking scent to pull it off, right?



:blink:



No, to be honest, I'd have to find a different way to secure world peace than exploiting my partner. Our relationship would never be the same. If sex could bring about world peace, it would have happened already with all of the trafficking throughout the world.

[JDeere]

I don't know if this thread exists. I was reading a friend's FB page and he occasionally posts "What if?" " Would you? types of questions to see the responses he gets.
Here is one of the questions I am stealing from him to see what everyone thinks or what the responses will be. This is to be fun :-)

The question is: To achieve world peace, would you let your significant other/ spouse sleep with your worst enemy?


My initial response was Hell Nooo screw the world!!! then I thought more on it and my answer still stands..lmao

UM HELL NO, not a chance in the world! World peace can find some other pawn!

[candy_coated_bitch]

Before I read this thread I thought my initial reaction was really selfish. However, I see I am in good company LOL. The answer is NO.

[Tuff Stuff]

The question is: To achieve world peace, would you let your significant other/ spouse sleep with your worst enemy?



Hell,I would sleep with my worst enemy to achieve world peace.
Wait..
I think I have and it didn't work...world peace that is.

[imperfect_cupcake]

Sure. If they agreed. They certainly wouldn't enjoy fucking someone I couldn't stand. No more than I would enjoy fucking someone they couldn't stand. I just hope they'd be able to steal themselves through the ordeal for world peace. I'd certainly pamper the shit out of them afterwards for doing something they loathed so much and being so selfless.

And then have sex with them to help erase the event and re-connect with the person they love most having sex with. Me. :D

Seriously. I'd feel badly for them. If someone asked me to have sex with someone my partner loathed for good reason my skin would crawl off but would take one for the planet. I wouldn't enjoy it, but it no worse than Cleaning up dog shit or someone's puke off the floor. If I'd do that for world peace, I'd suffer through 15 minutes of getting some obnoxious twat off.

[DapperButch]

Yes. And I don't think I am just saying this because I am single. World Peace? How could I ignore the number of lives that would be saved due to my partner sleeping with someone (by her own choice, of course)? :blink:

[TL1]

LOL no no and no

If I care about someone I couldn't do that to them or myself. If it's an open relationship probably but if not then no.
Really depends on the situation.
Call me selfish

[afrcnqueen]

Sure. If they agreed. They certainly wouldn't enjoy fucking someone I couldn't stand. No more than I would enjoy fucking someone they couldn't stand. I just hope they'd be able to steal themselves through the ordeal for world peace. I'd certainly pamper the shit out of them afterwards for doing something they loathed so much and being so selfless.

And then have sex with them to help erase the event and re-connect with the person they love most having sex with. Me. :D

Seriously. I'd feel badly for them. If someone asked me to have sex with someone my partner loathed for good reason my skin would crawl off but would take one for the planet. I wouldn't enjoy it, but it no worse than Cleaning up dog shit or someone's puke off the floor. If I'd do that for world peace, I'd suffer through 15 minutes of getting some obnoxious twat off.



OMG....I_C:superfunny: your response killed me! I commend you for taking one for the planet. But fuck that!! LoL Let the planet find someone else.

[Soon]

As long as they were ok with it, I'm cool with it.

[imperfect_cupcake]

Well, I think if anyone has lost anyone due to a bomb going off from a terrorist attack or from their country being blasted to shit and occupied, I don't think people would be quite so flippant about a bit of sex.

[TruTexan]

My answer? UHM HELL NO. I don't play share the partner well.at.all.
I'll leave this one to IC to solve world peace with sex. LOL ( and I'm just kidding).

[bobbi46]

hmmmm tuff question .....

part of me says Yes ..For world peace .
But my real answer is No...i dont control her or i cant tell her what to do nor do i want to .but i did marry her..and thats for life ..so in my little mind she is mine and mine alone :))

[imperfect_cupcake]

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

[job]

Absolutely. Even without the loved one's death, part added to it. World peace is kind of a big deal.

[TruTexan]

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

[~ocean]

sex for world peace ~ if hy wanted too i'd say go for it ~ after all it's only sex ~

[DapperButch]

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written to all:

Really? It is world peace people!

Like, are people seriously saying that they would not be ok with their partner having sex with someone ONE TIME for WORLD PEACE?

I would even have sex with a cis male for world peace. I may vomit along the way and have bad memories to work through later, but I would do it!

PLUS, the world would be so grateful, and women would see me as hot for "sacrificing for the world", I could make up for anything nasty I had to do!

[DapperButch]

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

[Smiling]

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

It's a dirty job, but somebody's gotta do it. Since I don't have a partner, I'd personally take one for the team.

And if I did have a partner, would I "let" them sleep with someone else? I don't think it's my decision to make for anyone else. Partner or no - it isn't about "ownership." You do what you've gotta do and then I'll do likewise. Either we can get past it or we can't; but world peace!

It's about the big picture, after all.

[Orema]

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

Yes, I'd allow it.

Whether or not world peace is on the table, if death is the only option if I don't allow them to have sex, then yes—have at it. But I'm timing it.

I just can't let my partner die over my jealousy and I"m so jealous even I have to laugh at myself sometimes.

[Katniss]

Absolutely it would be ok with me. It's world peace for goodness sakes! Think about boarding a plane with no TSA screenings, not being worried about an idiot with a bomb in their backpack, shoe, or up their butt. Think of all the money saved on war that could be better spent on healthcare, sustainable energy, education, art and music! Matter of fact, for world peace even I'd sleep with my nemisis. Heck, make it a threesome and afterwards my real love and I can go get sea salt scrub downs, high 5 one another and split a cheesecake because we are now sexsuperheros!

As to an orgasm, that wouldn't bug me either. A few electrodes on the brain in the right place can achieve that too so why should I feel threatened?

Katniss

[Kobi]

To achieve world peace, would you let your significant other/ spouse sleep with your worst enemy?

Had to think this one over.

The premise is my partner sleeping with my worst enemy would achieve world peace. Logic dictates, that if this is true, then my partner and my worst enemy are both responsible for world disharmony. In this case, I would not only sanction the union, I would help them pack and move in together. :)

On the other hand, as a woman, I know the power of the p***y. As such, after negotiating an ironclad, irrevocable pre-coital agreement, it would be ok with me.

On the third hand, considering who I consider my worst enemy to be, I'm thinking my partners response to my agreeing, even for the sake of world peace, will be something along the lines of :thefinger: :yesno: :furious::slapfight::beatcomputer:

Is there an easier question?

[imperfect_cupcake]

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

So, what you are saying is, you'd prefer to let someone you love die (mum, dad, sibbling or best friend).

Ok. What if it's your partner? What if she will die? Would you prefer to let her die or to let someone else have sex with her for 15 minutes?

[JDeere]

World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.

[imperfect_cupcake]

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

I'd like to point out that having an orgasm is a physical reaction and doesn't mean the other person is enjoying it. Many people can be forced to have an orgasm who don't want to or find what they are doing to be vile. Rape victims can be forced to have orgasms. They find it quite traumatic.

There was a twilight zone type program in the UK called the black mirror. In it the Priminister had to have sex with a pig until he orgasmed on public tv to prevent the death of a woman who was beloved by the nation. He did it. He vomited and sobbed after, but in the story he did it.

If my partner decided to sleep with someone vile to save people from dying I would do anything within my power to make them feel better after.

[imperfect_cupcake]

World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.


JD would you watch your parents/best friend/your partner herself be blown up
Or
You partner have sex for 15 minutes

[JDeere]

JD would you watch your parents/best friend/your partner herself be blown up
Or
You partner have sex for 15 minutes

Yes I would rather die or have them die before I let them sleep with someone.

Again world peace will NEVER happen.

Again my opinion and feelings even if it's not part of the norm but I am not going to change how I feel just because I get crap for my posts.

[imperfect_cupcake]

I didn't say world peace. I said you'd watch a family member die or your partner die.

You said you'd rather watch a family member die or watch them die or die yourself.

Disagreement is not shit, JD. It's just disagreement.

[JDeere]

I didn't say world peace. I said you'd watch a family member die or your partner die.

You said you'd rather watch a family member die or watch them die or die yourself.

Disagreement is not shit, JD. It's just disagreement.

Disagreement is fine but I refuse to be berated like Tru is getting. That type of crap isn't cool, that's why I posted what I posted.

[imperfect_cupcake]

Berated??

Show me the berating. Explicitly. Show me what is being done to berate tru.

[DapperButch]

I'd like to point out that having an orgasm is a physical reaction and doesn't mean the other person is enjoying it. Many people can be forced to have an orgasm who don't want to or find what they are doing to be vile. Rape victims can be forced to have orgasms. They find it quite traumatic.

There was a twilight zone type program in the UK called the black mirror. In it the Priminister had to have sex with a pig until he orgasmed on public tv to prevent the death of a woman who was beloved by the nation. He did it. He vomited and sobbed after, but in the story he did it.

If my partner decided to sleep with someone vile to save people from dying I would do anything within my power to make them feel better after.

Yes, didn't think of it this way, absolutely. When you mentioned rape victims, it made me think of child abuse victims and how that issue really messes with one's head. It is physiological.

[JDeere]

Berated??

Show me the berating. Explicitly. Show me what is being done to berate tru.

Its obvious, however I am not going to argue on an open thread. I will discuss it in a private message.

[imperfect_cupcake]

I don't see it.
I'm see people disagreeing, stating they don't understand and why.

berate: to yell and scold at someone in an angry way.

I don't see that going on. I see emphatics being used. I don't see anger or scolding.

But, perhaps I'm just not as sensitive as you and thus just don't perceive it that way.

I personally beg to differ there is any berating. *shrug*

If you think there is any inappropriate posting, report it.

[imperfect_cupcake]

Yes, didn't think of it this way, absolutely. When you mentioned rape victims, it made me think of child abuse victims and how that issue really messes with one's head. It is physiological.

For sure.

Like I said, if someone I was partnered with chose to save the world by sleeping with someone vile, I'd do my very best to make them feel better afterwards. Cause it would really suck to have done that. And loving them, I'd want to help them recover and heal from it.

It totally makes me think of that black mirror episode

[Kobi]

World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.


Thank you for saying this. It is grounded in reality and I, for one, appreciate that.

I am not sure what the original question was supposed to gauge i.e. jealously levels; altruism levels; perceived "ownership" of a partner, their bodies and their decisions; people, especially women being expected to sacrifice themselves or others for the good of humankind; or to what lengths are you willing to go if world peace was even a reality.

If world peace was so simple as to be attained by one sexual encounter, given the sexual freedoms and sexual slavery we have today, we should be oozing peacefulness. But, people being people complicate even the simplest of things. And, love and sex have caused more wars than they have solved. Hence the reason I would want an iron clad, irrevocable contract.

But, back to fantasy land, if world peace was even possible, and if we changed the variable necessary to achieve it, one has to wonder if people would be so quick to jump on the bandwagon.

[imperfect_cupcake]

I view these questions in line with "if you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be and why"

Obviously, I'm not a tree and I can never be turned into one. But its an imteresting question and I love playing the game "what if." Its a game I play often with partners:
"What if you could only communicate with a nose flute? How would you do that?"
People I generally get on with and have fun with come up with all kinds of different and creative answers.
People I tend not to click with tend to answer "thats stupid. Why would that even happen? Why are you even asking me this? It's nonsense."

It's a thought experiment. And people explain their choices.

[TruTexan]

So, what you are saying is, you'd prefer to let someone you love die (mum, dad, sibbling or best friend).

Ok. What if it's your partner? What if she will die? Would you prefer to let her die or to let someone else have sex with her for 15 minutes?

It's not up to me, to LET anyone do anything. I said I don't share well with others, there's a lot of pain for me involving that very issue and I can't get past it. I'm sorry, my answer is still NO.

[imperfect_cupcake]

It's not up to me, to LET anyone do anything. I said I don't share well with others, there's a lot of pain for me involving that very issue and I can't get past it. I'm sorry, my answer is still NO.

I totally agree with the letting thing. And I've had people cheat on me and it is painful. I don't see this as cheating or sharing, I suppose. In my head it's only "what someone would do to prevent death of someone I love."

To you it's something else. I'm not sure I understand because death of my mom would trump having to comfort my partner from having to have sex with an idiot (and I'd be buying them flowers and chocolates for the rest of my days in thanks for their selfless act of help) but I accept that somehow you see it different. I'd love to understand why someone would think that way but I won't ask as it appears to be a sore point.

Thanks for answering

[TruTexan]

I totally agree with the letting thing. And I've had people cheat on me and it is painful. I don't see this as cheating or sharing, I suppose. In my head it's only "what someone would do to prevent death of someone I love."

To you it's something else. I'm not sure I understand because death of my mom would trump having to comfort my partner from having to have sex with an idiot (and I'd be buying them flowers and chocolates for the rest of my days in thanks for their selfless act of help) but I accept that somehow you see it different. I'd love to understand why someone would think that way but I won't ask as it appears to be a sore point.

Thanks for answering


It is very painful to talk about and thank you for recognizing that. I appreciate it. I don't want to discuss this any further and thank you for not asking me to.