![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just out of curiosity - are all instances where someone tries to deflect an attack on a friend "moderating"? Or is it only moderating when I do it? |
Quote:
Hudson, personal attacks and bringing drama from other sites is against TOS. This is a warning. If you have any personal issues to iron out, please do so in private. In addition, the comment you just posted only adds fuel to the fire. This does not add any thing of value to the thread. |
Quote:
I reckon only you can answer that. I thought you were 'just voicing an opinion'. |
Quote:
|
Interesting thread..
Superfemme, thanks for starting it.. Once again, the people on this site have gotten me thinking about how I go through life and the words that I use and how I use them. I work in Hillcrest, the *gay* area of San Diego. I work in a retail store that has adult toys and DVD's as well as clothing. Mostly clothing, honestly.. In any case, we cater to mainly gay males. I have used words to describe the straight college kids that look at the dildos and giggle, or the guys that come in on thier cells saying, "Yeah, dude, i just walked into the gay shop". I refer to some of them as breeders to my other co-workers.. Is this right? No.. I never even thought it was hurtful. Reading this thread has changed my views on the term and I won't be using it, or will at least correct myself when I do use it. We also refer to some of the more.. Flamboyant.. gay men as Queens. Keep in mind, over half the staff are gay men or at least bi.. But we use it in a derogatory way, usually for the guys that come in, ask for all the size 14 heels we have, try them on, act like.. well, Queens.. and then don't buy anything. I'll be honest, we tend to call people a lot of things.. lmao. Now I have to sit back and ask.. why? My thought is that for *me*, it is out of anger and frustration. I have to get at them some way and I can't be rude to thier faces, so it gets the frustration out.. Unprofessional? Hell yes.. Very human? Also, yes. Someone mentioned the fact that human nature is human nature, and sadly, part of that nature is making one feel better about ones' self by putting another person or a group of people down. I feel angry and belittled with straight boy comes in and finds it funny to see the gay store, like we're a friggin' zoo.. I feel frustrated and belittled when a customer takes 30 to 40 minutes of my time, me climbing ladders and getting shoes and they can't even make eye contact with me and treat me like a servant? Fuck yeah that pisses me off and I may refer to them as a fucking queen. Words do have power. They can be weapons, or they can be tools for healing.. It's all about how we use them. Just my .2 on the "shim" "he/she" thing.. *sighs* I am not a fan. I will admit when i was growing up and in the closet, i threw that word around with my then friends and buddies. I was trying to be a part of the straight guy world, and amazingly, there was a lot of name calling involved.. lol Now? I still hear the term, mostly from older lesbians, to be truthful.. *shrugs* I try to explain about transgender and all the personal story stuff, and sometimes it takes, sometimes it doesn't.. But i chalk that one up to ignorance or just plain ass hat behavior (ass hat, now that's a word I'm going to start throwing around more..). That is how I've used words to hurt others.. In truth, it only hurts and belittles me to use them and to have that negitive energy so near to my heart.. Something that I'm working on, daily. Thanks again for the thread and to everyone that posted. -Tony |
Quote:
I just did. I hope everyone heeds my warning. |
Quote:
I do limit my attempts to educate, to those that use words with.. carelessness, not .. with clear nasty intent. I agree, its very painful, that so many don't care... I wish I had a penny, even in this economy, for every time someone has told me I am too "PC", because I try and explain that how we use..words has power..and that I am offended by someones use of a word.. |
I've actually only heard the words "shim" or "s-he" used in one place (maybe I'm super sheltered?). It was here:
And I really do still feel that the Lunachicks meant no harm. In the context of that song it was about breaking out of gender norms. And they meant it in a good way. |
Quote:
|
I would like to know other's thoughts on the usage of the word Faggot. I have had it used on Me, and not in a good way. Quite frankly, I have never heard it used in a good way. So, I would have to say to Me it is a word to hurt our own. IMHO.
|
Quote:
Is there really such a think as being too considerate or too "PC"? I hope not. Thanks for understanding. |
Quote:
I think if I were a heterosexual and I was calling my friend Faggot it would be -vastly- different than how it is intended/received coming from my place of Queer-ness. So again, back to context. Right? The person who called you a Faggot meant it in a hurtful way, I get that. But not every instance where the term Faggot is used is inherently hurtful. |
Thank you bete. I agree, it is about context. Oddly, it was said to Me by another queer.. so I was a bit shocked. (hence My mentioning about it being used to hurt our own). I also agree with what you said about "instances" when it is used.
Quote:
|
Thinking, Jake, and as I recollect, I have never heard the word faggot used as an endearment ... fag, sometimes, yes.
I refer to myself (as do some of my friends) as a "faggy" butch ... it is meant as an acknowledgment that I share some stereotypical behaviors and ways of being as my gay brothers. These are good things, by the way. So, I don't mind that, nor do my gay male friends, as they, too, call me this at times. But, faggot, no. Never in my recollection have heard it in anyway except derogatorily. |
Quote:
I know that a lot of people hear the word "faggot" right before a baseball bat hits their head or a fist lands upside their head. I don't want to be the PTSD in anyones day so I try to be really aware. Thanks Jake Tulane for bringing it up. |
Quote:
thanks again |
Quote:
|
I don't think people outside the group to whom the slur is used get to 'decide' if the term is offensive or not or when it's considered offensive. If One has never belonged to the group in question, than how would One have any point of reference as to it's usage/context/etc?
I also think there's a big difference between the people of the group using the term and people outside the group using the word. Dylan |
Quote:
GOOD point. Fag vs. Faggot I think the latter is used in a more vicious manner. |
Quote:
As allies to <insert group here> people are never to know when to employ common sense and know something is offensive? I'm not understanding you here. |
I really think that the relationships between people is a HUGE deciding factor in what is okay and what is not okay. When you reach a certain level of familiarity with someone boundaries shift.
Take for example, my friend Bob. I love Bob. We've been friends for, well, for nearly forever. Bob calls me names all the time, her favourite being "twat". I'm sure she's done it at least once in these here forums. I am okay with Bob calling me a twat, because Bob is my friend and she loves me and I know that Bob has absolutely no malicious will when it comes to me. I call her all sorts of things, too. (My personal favourite is anal fissure.) It's all good. It's part of our shtick. But if someone who I did not have that kind of relationship with were to call me a twat - I would probably break their nose. |
Quote:
It is NOT mutilation to cut off the foreskin of a penis. It IS mutilation to cut off the clitoris and the labia. There is a HUGE difference between these 2 acts. |
Quote:
technicality. you are both right. genital mutilation –noun any type of cutting or removal of all or some of the genital organs, esp. excision of the clitoris. |
Quote:
Intent and context are also critical. Almost any word can be used in a way that hurts or a way that heals...depending upon how it's meant and when and how it's used. I try to avoid language that is painful or uncomfortable for others. I also know that there will be times when I unintentionally hurt others with my words. It's almost unavoidable without constant censoring of every word...and then communication becomes incredibly cumbersome. I think sometimes we're using a word we've reclaimed, sometimes we're just spouting off without thinking, sometimes we're just being lazy about our communication, and sometimes it's that icky side of human nature that likes to jab at the weakest spot on others. The words used may be the same....but those all feel different to me. :rrose: |
Thinking about this from the standpoint of reclaiming language and using various words in context.
For me, there are words that I use in reference to myself that I know other people find offensive. As someone else mentioned, the girls I work with used to get upset when I called myself a duke or queer because they've always seen those as bad words. I use them because they are the most relevant to me and most of them now use them when talking about me, "My dyke friend at work says it's ok for me to go to the parade as long as I don't cringe at the queer boys in leather." I know a number of people who don't like most of the words I use. I've lost count of the number of people who think "butch" is an insult. As a matter of respect, I don't use those words when talking about them but I'm not going to use different words to describe me just because I'm around them. My friend J is a lesbian. Not a duke and not butch and really not queer. So I would never refer to her as any of those things bit it doesn't mean that I have to stop calling myself a dyke when I'm around her. |
Sorry about the typos. Posting from my phone and it thinks dyke=duke.
|
Quote:
There is no technicality...........cutting off the clit in NO WAY relates to cutting off the foreskin................... ------------- I am again going to question authority........who within the group gets to decide what is 'appropriate'. If I removed from my vocabulary all words that offended someone........hell I could not call myself a 'big ole bull dagger/dyke'.... or queer or a fag or any number of words that are offensive to many segments of the greater LGBTQQI community............crap I have to think about it to get all the damn letters right ........... I was around when 'Queer Nation' started..........laughin..........all those rich gay white assimilationist men and women had a big ole hissy fit...... I am left with wondering what words I can and cannot use on this website based on offense taken by some members of this website........... |
Quote:
Quote:
I am not nit picking, just teasing it apart in my mind. Like the word breeder. I really dislike that word, but say my friend ID's as a Femme Breeder. Ummm. I think my head just exploded, but not really. Most people don't self identify in ways that are meant to hurt themselves or others so at the end of the day a lot of you are right. Context is huge. |
Quote:
But, I wanted to say that I don't believe that either....However, If words are used to intentionally hurt someone they FEEL more awful than they are. We're all subjective. It's all our point of view, how we recieve EVERYTHING. They really are "words" we've chosen to describe something negative that can have positive meaning too. That's kinda what I meant. I had a therapist once..(don't be mean... LOL) that said ....about me and my brother, living in the same house and how different we seemed to be...she said we each receive the same sintuation differently. Words CAN ...seem to make you taller or smaller...but....that's your inner self telling you that. It's your experiences that fall in to play. (all this is how *I* believe by the way)...and I believe how we receive things colors everything. We just take it in. I try hard not to make it about me when things like "words" are said. I live in a world where Butch is a bad word. maybe I'm thicker skinned but........... I can't change them. I can help educate them. But educate the world...naw....I'm tired on that. LOL I call it when I see it...that's all I can do. ooh Rattling again!! :) -Mr. Moon |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Years ago, like a couple of decades, I used to LAUGH my ass off if the most hurtful thing a person could say to me was something about being fat. How very sad that in order to insult me they would only be able to pick out the most obvious thing about me. "Hey fat ass, watch it!" Come on, use a little imagination. After about the age of 12 being called fat rarely ever bothered me. I have more anxiety wrapped up in "butch" than I ever did in fat, dyke, fag, faggot, queer, snatch eater, fudge-packer, bull-dyke, bulldagger, carpet muncher, mick, bubble-butt, dumbo, cloud, homo, kraut eater, white bread, wonder bread, herm, amazon, wannabe, man, dude, beav, beaver, bitch, whore, slut, commie, fruit, chachi, man-hater, chief, honcho, big man, big fella, battle-axe, skank, shrew, chick... I could go on. But I think you get my point. While I believe that words can hit as hard as a fist at some point it's a matter of personal responsibility to stand up and say "you know what? I'm not going to allow your ignorance to hurt me any longer" when someone is using these words in an attempt to hurt you. The words in and of themselves? I find them mostly powerless. It is when we identify so strongly with something that a word has the ability to hurt us. Hence my issue around "butch". Telling that on more than one occasion I've eschewed the term. I have a real love/hate relationship with the word and my identity around it. Quote:
What size does a person have to be in order to use it? Size 8? 12? 16? If someone had been a size 4 for years and suddenly finds themselves a size 10 are they to censor themselves when around people of considerably larger size? ********* On the OP: to "breed" is to produce offspring, no? According to MW, it is anyway. Also "breeding" is: the result of upbringing or training as shown in behavior and manners; manners, esp. good manners: "You can tell when a person has breeding." Now, we could also get into the elitist stuff surrounding things like that, but I digress. I understand the arguments about this and that there are individuals who feel this is hurtful to women in general and find it hurtful to them, as individuals. Duly noted. In looking at the term in the context of the queer rights movement I understood it to stem from a desire to label heteros who "had it easy". Who were physically capable of "breeding" of their own accord. Who had reproductive rights and opportunities that same sex couples did not. Perhaps I have more progressive (or perhaps less progressive?) hetero friends than most people, but I have at least two couples in my world who refer to themselves as breeders. |
Quote:
For me, "fat" is self-identified, just like any other term or description. Some people would feel or be "fat" by their own definition in a size 4, others in a 22 or a 5x or whatever. I'm not saying anyone needs to censor themselves...I'm saying how I perceive things. If you read my whole post you would see the last line...where I said that these things feel different to me. There's a huge difference to me between that woman who was always a size 4and is now in a 10 saying "I'm struggling with this; I feel fat and undesirable" and the woman in a size 0 making fat comments to her friends behind my back...generally just loud enough for me to hear. To me, a size 10 is slim, but perhaps not to her. For others, a size 22 feels fabulous. That's their perception, and has nothing to do with me. Make sense? |
definitions
breed·er (brdr)
n. 1. A person who breeds animals or plants. 2. An animal kept to produce offspring. 3. Offensive Slang A heterosexual person. 4. A source or cause: social injustice a breeder of revolutions. 5. A breeder reactor. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. It might also be worth checking out the variety of definitions at urbandictionary.com eg: Breeder is a slang term (either joking or derogatory) used to describe heterosexuals, primarily by homosexuals. It is drawn from the fact that while homosexual sex does not lead to reproduction, heterosexual sex can, with implicit mocking by connotation of animal husbandry. |
to breed and breeder are not the same. to me.
mirriam webster on breeder: Main Entry: breed·er Pronunciation: \ˈbrē-dər\ Function: noun Date: 1531 : one that breeds: as a : an animal or planthttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif kept for propagation b : one engaged in the breeding of a specified organism c : a nuclear reactor designed to produce more fissionable material than it uses as fuel —called also breeder reactor Thank you for understanding that it is hurtful. In turn, duly noted that your progressive friends do not find it hurtful. Perhaps if I divulged more personal information on how I became pregnant it would help garner more understanding on why being compared to an animal makes me feel like I've been punched in the stomach. Unfortunately, I'm not ready to do that here. |
Quote:
In an attempt to other heteros, there is also a line being drawn about who qualifies as lesbian/gay and who does not. Within our community, for the term "breeder" to be used to refer to straight people in an ugly way, it is not only ugly to straight people, but it is rejecting and erasing of the people within our community who have had kids. If you have hetero friends who refer to themselves as breeders, they are doing so from a place of hetero privilege. Also, self-referencing using an offensive term is not the same as othering somebody by calling them an ugly term, no? |
Quote:
Here's hoping you, or anyone else, finds a day when this is a non-issue. Quote:
And I certainly hope that we, as a culture, have not reached the point where we are relying on UrbanDictionary.com to definitively understand this or any other term. Quote:
If the first definition is "one that breeds", then by logic one would check out the definition of "breed", no? They aren't the same, but the words and their definitions are related, obviously. But like many terms in our modern world they are used in a variety of ways. Not always as they were intended. |
I have always been told by my mother that I shouldn't have kids. I would love to have kids, but I run a 50/50 chance of not being able to carry, and that is why I don't have kids. I support single mothers, my best friend of 23 years is one. I watch her work two full time jobs to make sure her little boy has food, clean clothes and a place to live.
Thank you Jo Jo! Zimmy Quote:
|
I don't want to nitpick the etymology of the word breeder. To take it out of context feels like a bait and switch at a political convention.
I guess at the end of the day we all get to choose how we are going to give our power away and how we are going to take it back. (f) |
Quote:
If I were to call someone a breeder that does not exclude anyone. (EDIT: it addresses an individual or identified group. I cannot exclude someone without specificity. Someone can exclude themselves because they do not identify with a term. I hope that makes sense) I was referencing my understanding of the ORIGIN of the derisive usage. There was a time when relatively few queers had children (originating of their queer union) so to say it was rejecting or erasing seems odd. Today, perhaps more so, but even then it seems to want it both ways. "Wait, I don't like that term applied to me!" and then to be upset because it excludes you? Theoretically I understand, but um... it's weird. And I don't think it's a matter of hetero privilege. It's a description of their act of having children. But let's say that it is... is it not their right to "take back" or "own" a derogatory term in the same way I've taken back "Dyke"? But I do agree on the point of "self-referencing" and "othering". |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 AM. |
ButchFemmePlanet.com
All information copyright of BFP 2018