Quote:
Originally Posted by dark_crystal
I am concerned about Russia. Whether or not people are currently feeling the anti-mainstream heat, Russia will make sure sentiments like these grow legs.
Chapo Traphouse stated multiple times that interest in the Russia investigation was a litmus test for who NOT to support among the Dem candidates.
It's like they are Russian Meddling deniers, despite extensive proof that the Russians used them last time.
This will make just make the left a better weapon.
|
Part of the reason the #NeverHillary situation last year was so terrifying to me was because it was as much IRL than online, in that i had 2 Sanders supporters close to me (both guys, one white/cishet) who hated Hillary Clinton so much that i thought they were about to stroke out over it. Ruining ever happy hour and dinner party and ranting 24/7 on facebook. And i couldn't mute them because i was going to see them.
Anyway, i feel like this lingering hatred is driving the tendency of outlets like
Chapo Traphouse to mock and dismiss the Russia situation.
If Russia delivered the election to Trump, Clinton's loss was
not because of how badly she sucked. It was
not because the Democrats failed to nominate Bernie.
If Trump cheated, then Clinton
didn't lose.
Clinton's loss validates the idea that the Democrats need to move further left. If she didn't lose, some of that validation shift back to the center.
We're not supposed to talk abut politics at work, but we have talked about the Russian meddling because it is relevant to our work.
I have colleagues who feel like what Russia did was no big deal.
If Russia changed votes by amplifying and promoting misinformation, they believe that's fair. Critical thinking is available to everyone, they say, and if people had used it, Russia's tricks wouldn't have worked.
I guess that's what
Chapo Traphouse thinks, too.
But
is critical thinking available to everyone? I don't feel that it is, and part of a librarian's job is to address that.