Quote:
Originally Posted by Martina
I am not sure that there is anyone among the Dems running who people dislike as much as Hillary, so I guess it's encouraging. Or not. The Dems are not to be trusted. They still blame everyone else but Clinton for the loss. Anyway, this was interesting:
"Trump was able to win in 2016 because that election came down to a choice between him and Hillary Clinton. Clinton was the second-least-liked major party nominee of all time, and there was 18% of the electorate that liked neither Clinton nor Trump. Trump won this 18% of the electorate by 17 points and with it the election. In other words, Trump was seen as the lesser of two evils."
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/03/05/pol...www.cnn.com%2F
|
Please give me one
good reason why Hillary was the 2nd least liked major party nominee of all time. When did that happen? Who made that happen? You all really believe there was ever only one nominee less Satanic than Hillary?
I've never really understood why Democrats and the Left allow Repubs and the Right to define and smear their candidates, accept the smear as legit, and then spend the rest of their political thought defending agst straw man bullshit
Why are so many of you such cowering wimps, so eager to self flagellate and accept every nasty distraction tossed at you.
Ignore the A..Holes. That's what they do because they understand that the public is too ignorant to distinguish fine argument.being constantly on the defensive is just dumb.
Stop going on abt how bad Hillary was. Leave that to the Right.
Want the perfect male candidate, resurrect Jesus.
Want the perfect female candidate, dig up Mother Teresa.
Want the worst possible candidate, let the Right pick one for you and then go on and on about whether they got it right.
What a divisive waste of time and resources.