06-10-2010, 02:18 PM
|
#50
|
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?: femme
Relationship Status: attached
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,896
Thanks: 29,046
Thanked 13,093 Times in 3,386 Posts
Rep Power: 21474858
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by always2late
I am also a survivor of abuse, and while I agree that these images do not make pedophiles, this does not detract from the fact that sexualizing a child is beyond wrong. It is just disgusting.
I also find the breastfeeding doll very off. And, forgive me, but I don't understand the logic in the post. I agree that breasts are functional and not necessarily sexual, and yes, children want to emulate their parents...but that does not mean we LET them. It is OUR job as parents to set boundaries for our children...and this includes determining what is appropriate and/or inappropriate for a child. That is the point....there are adult behaviors, mannerisms, clothing, etc...that are not APPROPRIATE for a child! For example...my son would LOVE, I am sure, to try to drive the car. However, he is 10 with neither the judgement, size, or skill to drive...therefore, NO driving. Sorry if it seems like I am oversimplifying...but really, shouldn't it be that simple?
|
Sure driving a car and feeding an infant are adult behaviours, and that is why toy companies have developed products that let the child imaginatively participate in them.
A child can drive a pretend car and that is fine--the child wants to emulate the act of driving, so the parents buy a toy car/big wheels (whatever) for the child to scoot around in.
I'm with Dylan and Julie--why is a toy bottle a more appropriate device for the imaginary feeding of a baby?
I don't see this type of doll as contributing to the sexualization of children.
|
|
|