06-11-2010, 04:03 PM
|
#87
|
Timed Out
How Do You Identify?: Permanently Banned 10/24/2010
Preferred Pronoun?: She.
Relationship Status: Married (one of 18,000)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 4,933
Thanks: 2,309
Thanked 7,108 Times in 2,327 Posts
Rep Power: 0
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowSoonIsNow
I just googled *pedophilia and media images of children* to find any research/evidence on this subject, and this thread is the first result.
.gif)
|
And that is why I use Bing vs. Google. It is much more reliable.
I too, Googled "Sexual Images of Children in the Media: Promoting Pedophilia?"
http://www.smh.com.au/business/media...1130-k178.html
(i guess dylan didn't read this)
http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Ped...e_Internet.pdf
(the internet which carries images of over sexualized children and pedophiles. relevant.)
http://americansfortruth.com/issues/pedophiliapederasty
(dylan approved)
http://www.etherzone.com/2010/mako011110.shtml
(a tidbit about a society where pornography and obscenity flourish and where children are sexualized.)
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27431 (this one is all about us gay pedophiles)
http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/ppitv.htm
(this one may be stretching it a bit, but did come up in the first few links of search)
Imagine my surprise when the planet didn't even show up on a search. .gif)
Thank you Dylan, for educating me on "relevance". I can die happy now.
Last edited by SuperFemme; 06-11-2010 at 04:15 PM.
Reason: dylan told me to
|
|
|