No, Heart. My intention is not to a nefarious plot to undermine what happens to boys vs. what happens to girls. BOTH happen to very young children who have no say in the matter.
As a society, we find male circumcision socially acceptable, even healthier, yet there is very little evidence that this is true. The article about HIV infection suggested circumcision. Are the anaerobic bacteria present not destroyed to antibacterial soap? It seems less invasive to wash the foreskin than to cut it off.
I'm not interested in created a hierarchy debating which is a worse condition. Obviously, female circumcision is worse.
__________________
"We never forget those who make us blush."
Jean-Francois de la Harpe
|