07-23-2010, 06:59 PM
|
#15
|
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?: femme
Relationship Status: attached
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,896
Thanks: 29,046
Thanked 13,098 Times in 3,386 Posts
Rep Power: 21474858
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melissa
Linus - tell that to Texas. This Littleton law, as far as I know, does not recognize any surgery or change of marker on docs. It basically says born a male then you are a male. It is the ultimate in transphobia. That's why I asked if there was a will. I think a will could trump this law. If there is no will and she loses the lawsuit then she loses the death benefits. If there was a will then she could be ok.
Melissa
|
Thanks. That is what I was attempting to express as well.
Florida has a similar precedent setting fucked up case (Kanteras vs. Kanteras) where an ex wife went for custody (married to a transman for like ten years I think); she outed her husband (she became born again from what I recall); and the judge ruled their marriage was invalid from the start and any marriages thereafter--where one partner is trans--is not to be considered a valid and legal heterosexual marriage.
|
|
|