Quote:
Originally Posted by HowSoonIsNow
But, how can there be *sides* when, if Nikki was not trans, none of this would EVER be able to occur?
This case would not exist. She would be entitled to whatever assets/benefits any other wife would receive after her husband died. END OF.
I don't see the whole there are two sides to this story when, if this marriage was considered valid/legal, this fight to get her benefits would never even be able to be a logical or reasonable idea or thought.
|
People challenge inheritances all of the time - and assets are frozen until those cases are decided. I know this from my own family experience, in which there were no issues about gender or the legaility of any marriages. It was simply a plain old fight for the money.