View Single Post
Old 07-27-2010, 03:43 PM   #3
dreadgeek
Power Femme

How Do You Identify?:
Cinnamon spiced, caramel colored, power-femme
Preferred Pronoun?:
She
Relationship Status:
Married to a wonderful horse girl
 
dreadgeek's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lat: 45.60 Lon: -122.60
Posts: 1,733
Thanks: 1,132
Thanked 6,844 Times in 1,493 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852
dreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputation
Member Photo Albums
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manul View Post
I expect to see more and more of these kinds of lawsuits in the coming years. It'll continue to happen because it's a great strategy. It works like this:

Take someone who is, say, a graduate student in biology. They write their dissertation or thesis on some interesting gene sequence or another and utterly fail to mention the adaptive significance for the trait. The reviewing committee, quite reasonably, asks the prospect why they have managed to write N pages and completely avoid the subject of selection, fitness, or adaptation. They then reply along the general lines that Darwinian theory isn't true. So the review committee rejects the paper. The person then goes off butt-hurt (to use my wife's phrasing) to the Thomas Moore center (a conservative legal advocacy outfit) claiming that they are being discriminated against because they are a Christian. The problem, of course, is not their religion but that they are not meeting the minimal standards of competency in the field.

This is what I think is happening here. As a prospective counselor her ethical obligation is to *not* go in there and start preaching about what her god thinks about homosexuality or what the Bible has to say on the subject. If she has stated that she will not abide by that ethical standard then it is absolutely appropriate for her to undergo censure or something like it.

The other reason this will become increasingly common is two-fold; it reinforces the pre-existing narrative that fundamentalist Christians already have running which is that the they are the victims and 'The World' is the oppressor. So, in the gay rights battle they believe--quite honestly--that they are the victims and that any laws protecting us from discrimination are, in fact, laws against Christianity (yes, they really, honestly, genuinely, believe this). The second reason is that Americans try to be fair-minded to a fault. We *want* to be on the side of the underdogs and we love the story of the plucky person going up against the big bully.

I'm already aware of a physicist who, in Ben Stein's movie "Expelled", claimed he was fired from the astronomy department at a university in Iowa because he's a Christian. However, that's not the case. The problem was that he had the combination of very bad student evals and he hadn't published any work in 10 years. He wasn't tenured and they determined that he just wasn't cutting the mustard.

Cheers
Aj
__________________
Proud member of the reality-based community.

"People on the side of The People always ended up disappointed, in any case. They found that The People tended not to be grateful or appreciative or forward-thinking or obedient. The People tended to be small-minded and conservative and not very clever and were even distrustful of cleverness. And so, the children of the revolution were faced with the age-old problem: it wasn’t that you had the wrong kind of government, which was obvious, but that you had the wrong kind of people. As soon as you saw people as things to be measured, they didn’t measure up." (Terry Pratchett)
dreadgeek is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dreadgeek For This Useful Post: