View Single Post
Old 10-01-2010, 02:14 AM   #6
AtLast
Infamous Member

How Do You Identify?:
Woman
Preferred Pronoun?:
HER - SHE
Relationship Status:
Relating
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CA & AZ I'm a Snowbird
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 11,826
Thanked 10,827 Times in 3,199 Posts
Rep Power: 21474857
AtLast Has the BEST ReputationAtLast Has the BEST ReputationAtLast Has the BEST ReputationAtLast Has the BEST ReputationAtLast Has the BEST ReputationAtLast Has the BEST ReputationAtLast Has the BEST ReputationAtLast Has the BEST ReputationAtLast Has the BEST ReputationAtLast Has the BEST ReputationAtLast Has the BEST Reputation
Member Photo Albums
Default

I'm thinking that perhaps standing slander laws just don't cover "impersonation," which is based upon deceipt with intent to do harm. I see HB's point about this, but as I really look at why a law like this came to be, it makes sense.

However, I want to research more about the possible infringement of free speech. But, is free speech hindered by this law pointing to an impersonation variable?

Some of the cases in which posters point to in which some horrible harm has been done, especially by bullying, does make me want to see some kind of legal remmedy available for victims or their families. And I have really had it with how bullying is taken so lightly.

Lots to ponder here.
AtLast is offline   Reply With Quote