View Single Post
Old 01-04-2010, 11:39 AM   #4
daisygrrl
Member

How Do You Identify?:
mouthy but adorable; kinky Gerbera
Preferred Pronoun?:
hey, cutie (or dudette)
Relationship Status:
xoxo
 
daisygrrl's Avatar
 
1 Highscore

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The South (Gooogia peach)
Posts: 475
Thanks: 2,157
Thanked 525 Times in 223 Posts
Rep Power: 1065210
daisygrrl Has the BEST Reputationdaisygrrl Has the BEST Reputationdaisygrrl Has the BEST Reputationdaisygrrl Has the BEST Reputationdaisygrrl Has the BEST Reputationdaisygrrl Has the BEST Reputationdaisygrrl Has the BEST Reputationdaisygrrl Has the BEST Reputationdaisygrrl Has the BEST Reputationdaisygrrl Has the BEST Reputationdaisygrrl Has the BEST Reputation
Default

I feel like I need to “out myself” from the beginning: I do not idenitfy as "trans" but I’ve thought about these ideas for several years, as a humanitarian and as having partnered with self-identified trans persons in the past.

The crux of this argument for me is: does a diagnosis, which is imposed and used as the main indicator of “truth” (scientifically speaking), erase agency? I really like Hudson’s post because it helps me reframe my worries a bit into thinking that maybe the more important question is, “How can we create spaces of agency within the discourses of sex/sexuality/all diagnoses/and even trauma?”

As far as de-stigmatizing (meaning the removal of cultural belief of a “defect”), WeatherB, I think it’s an important project in regard to any clinical diagnosis. I just wish the individual’s personal identification was privileged over medical discourse.
__________________
You can’t change that system by just getting your own rights, tinkering with the engine and leaving. You have to take on the whole machine.
--Riki Anne Wilchins

Hold on to the lessons, let go of the pain.
--Leslie Feinberg
daisygrrl is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to daisygrrl For This Useful Post: