Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparkle
I think that one of the privileges I experience as a Femme, who has never had conflict with the gender characteristics I was born with, is that I haven't had to give this issue much thought.
I simply have no preference, outside of conversations on here or very specific conversations about gender/gender identity/societal expectations etc. with friends, there is no reason for me to refer to my gender identity as cis, bio or XX.
I wonder... as we continue to explore gender identity and particularly as we push the conversation further in to the mainstream - perhaps (???) we should be on the same page with the terminology that we use when discussing Trans issues, with the realization that discussing the Trans experience may require we compare and contrast it to the __(cis/bio/XX)__ experience.
Should we?
Thanks Dapper, your poll has made me examine my privilege.
I still don't have a preference for one term over another, none feel *right* to me ... but perhaps I should really think about how best to articulate the concept.
|
Thanks, Sparkle. I appreciate your post.
I did a poor introduction to the topic, but this is where I was trying to go.
It may have made more sense for me to put it into the trans section, but I didn't want to exclude the rest of the site.
When the site first opened a couple of transsexed folks encouraged the use of the term cissexed when speaking about non trans people. I have had some discomfort with the term, but have continuously come up against this memory of preference every time I want to refer to someone who is non trans. I have always said bio male, for example, but now I hesitate with what to use, as I have heard transsexed individuals not like the use of that term. So, that is why I started going with XY male.
It does go back to privilege, I think. And who decides what term to use? You know?
Thanks again, Sparkle.