07-05-2011, 07:37 PM
|
#176
|
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?: Biological female. Lesbian.
Relationship Status: Happy
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hanging out in the Atlantic.
Posts: 9,234
Thanks: 9,840
Thanked 34,635 Times in 7,642 Posts
Rep Power: 21474861
|
Now that the jury is free to speak if they choose too, it will be interesting to hear them explain why they saw this the way they did.
It is disconcerting to see so many people judging them, accusing them, second guessing them without waiting to hear their side of the story. They were there, we werent.
They werent bombarded with the conjecture of every lawyer the media could find, the thoughts of all these legal pundits, the thoughts of anyone who wished to venture an opinion. They just had the facts presented in the court.
But somehow us armchair jurors know better? We somehow know the truth? We somehow are endowed with special powers to know what happened and who was responsible? And we know this beyond a shadow of a doubt?
I understand the anger at a perceived injustice. I understand wanting justice for this innocent child. I understand the many ways in which disappointment can be expressed. I'm also kind of familiar with that can occur after a case like this.
Justice isnt perfect. People arent perfect. Prosecutors make mistakes. Defense attorneys get lucky. It's life. It sucks. But its reality.
Emotions, running amok, in the name of justice leads to things like death threats, assaults, lynchings, war, and other vigilante actions.
Sometimes, taking a step back, and a deep breath leads to a cooler head, calmer emotions, and more rational thought.
Less drama, more thought....what a novel idea.
__________________
|
|
|