View Single Post
Old 09-07-2011, 04:06 PM   #40
dreadgeek
Power Femme

How Do You Identify?:
Cinnamon spiced, caramel colored, power-femme
Preferred Pronoun?:
She
Relationship Status:
Married to a wonderful horse girl
 
dreadgeek's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lat: 45.60 Lon: -122.60
Posts: 1,733
Thanks: 1,132
Thanked 6,841 Times in 1,493 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852
dreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputationdreadgeek Has the BEST Reputation
Member Photo Albums
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paintedleofemme View Post
My blood pressure is so high right now its not even funny(I need a cig,not that thats good!) But really, trying to prevent homosexual woman? This woman needs to get bent, let me do it please! We have all kinds of children born into this world, children with mental and physical disabilities , whats next, a shot for them? It saddens me what some people use science for, like this, nothing good.
Actually, these are different KINDS of things. If there is a cure for, just to name a few, multiple sclerosis, or cerebral palsy or Huntington's don't you think we *should* pursue it? Let's take, for instance, Huntington's because we *know* what causes it. Huntington's is caused by repeats of a particular sequence on a particular chromosome. Everyone has this particular repeat pattern but the problem arises if you have too many repeats. Now, since we know what the sequence is and we know what chromosome it lies on, if we could edit out the repeats and spare people a really unpleasant death shouldn't we do that? Editing out something like Tay-Sachs or Huntington's or, for that matter, sickle cell anemia would have demonstrable medical benefits and lives would be saved. That is not in the same ethical universe as someone who thinks that homosexuality is a biological 'error' and should be edited out.

Now, it may be a while before we can do the kind of genome editing I'm talking about but nothing in principle prevents it from happening and I see nothing ethically wrong with it. If one can prevent someone from contracting a disease should that be done?

Cheers
Aj
__________________
Proud member of the reality-based community.

"People on the side of The People always ended up disappointed, in any case. They found that The People tended not to be grateful or appreciative or forward-thinking or obedient. The People tended to be small-minded and conservative and not very clever and were even distrustful of cleverness. And so, the children of the revolution were faced with the age-old problem: it wasn’t that you had the wrong kind of government, which was obvious, but that you had the wrong kind of people. As soon as you saw people as things to be measured, they didn’t measure up." (Terry Pratchett)
dreadgeek is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dreadgeek For This Useful Post: