Member
How Do You Identify?: Niizh manidoowag...
Preferred Pronoun?: I prefer amature nouns
Relationship Status: Single
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 840
Thanks: 370
Thanked 1,528 Times in 536 Posts
Rep Power: 15623422
|
The implication that this woman should support this decision fully using only the fact that they are married as the reason, IMHO, is pretty anitquated. It only serves to prove her point that..."We should a) keep it quiet and support the transgender person or b) leave the relationship or c) both."
IMHO, the shoulders that bare this burden, belong soley to her partner in this case.
IMHO, the one who should be being supportive in this situation, is him. Something perhaps along the lines of...."I'm sorry I lied to you all this time baby. I know this is f#@king you up. I should have told you, but I know how you feel about this and I didn't want to lose you. So I lied. I thought if we we married, it would be harder for you to leave me. I love you and I was afraid. I want us to be together forever."
Because seriously, how "supportive" do you think he might be if four months into the marriage, she sprang upon him the information that at birth, she had been a he?
He lied to her. Bad decision. He married her, fully knowing what was about to come. She however, was not privey to that knowledge and had she been probably would have made a way different decision. It was wicked unfair.
Her use of the words rha rha tranny people pretty much say it all. I don't give these two a very good chance. The foundation of their lives together was built on a lie. How can the home stand strong?
__________________
Noblesse oblige...
|