Butch Femme Planet - View Single Post

Truly Scrumptious · 01-15-2012, 11:33 AM

It disturbs me too, for a couple of reasons. Obviously FB makes no sense. A friend of mine who is a brilliant artist has had her FB page taken down several times because of its erotic content, they said her art was offensive. (To me, the only offensive art is bad art, but even that is subjective.)

If your FB account is private and all your settings are adjusted so that absolutely nobody can see your pictures without your consent, then I don’t see any problems. Kids are going to emulate what they see at home, little girls will try on high heels and makeup, and little boys will practice shaving.
(And little boys will try on high heels and makeup, and little girls will practice shaving, but I digress.) The problem comes with the way people use FB. I regularly see people using pictures of their children as their own profile pic, leaving their photo albums open to all even though their wall might be private. I think that’s a mistake on so many levels, but if you want to share pictures of your drunk and disorderly self with the world, that’s your decision. Posting pictures of your kids anywhere on the internet needs to be considered very seriously.

And yes, I’d be worried about people sexualizing the pictures of little girls breast feeding their dolls, but the truth is that a simple Google search of “little girls breast feeding their dolls” turned up a kazillion images that are available to anyone with a computer, as well as plenty of information about “the breast milk baby”, an $89 doll that comes with a special halter top with two flowers positioned where nipples would be, and makes “lifelike” suckling sounds.

More on the doll here: http://thebreastmilkbaby.com/

Controversy about the doll here:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/breast-milk...2#.TxMNsoFJCSo

And this subject makes me think of this:

01-15-2012, 11:33 AM	#4
Truly Scrumptious Member How Do You Identify?: Femme Relationship Status: She's my mirror twin, my next of kin Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Entre Lajeunesse et la sagesse Posts: 667 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 2,047 Thanked 1,780 Times in 557 Posts Rep Power: 21474849	It disturbs me too, for a couple of reasons. Obviously FB makes no sense. A friend of mine who is a brilliant artist has had her FB page taken down several times because of its erotic content, they said her art was offensive. (To me, the only offensive art is bad art, but even that is subjective.) If your FB account is private and all your settings are adjusted so that absolutely nobody can see your pictures without your consent, then I don’t see any problems. Kids are going to emulate what they see at home, little girls will try on high heels and makeup, and little boys will practice shaving. (And little boys will try on high heels and makeup, and little girls will practice shaving, but I digress.) The problem comes with the way people use FB. I regularly see people using pictures of their children as their own profile pic, leaving their photo albums open to all even though their wall might be private. I think that’s a mistake on so many levels, but if you want to share pictures of your drunk and disorderly self with the world, that’s your decision. Posting pictures of your kids anywhere on the internet needs to be considered very seriously. And yes, I’d be worried about people sexualizing the pictures of little girls breast feeding their dolls, but the truth is that a simple Google search of “little girls breast feeding their dolls” turned up a kazillion images that are available to anyone with a computer, as well as plenty of information about “the breast milk baby”, an $89 doll that comes with a special halter top with two flowers positioned where nipples would be, and makes “lifelike” suckling sounds. More on the doll here: http://thebreastmilkbaby.com/ Controversy about the doll here: http://abcnews.go.com/US/breast-milk...2#.TxMNsoFJCSo And this subject makes me think of this: