03-29-2012, 04:03 PM
|
#35
|
Member
How Do You Identify?: Rainbow femme
Preferred Pronoun?: princess
Relationship Status: Married
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 514
Thanks: 508
Thanked 1,817 Times in 417 Posts
Rep Power: 10560327
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Library_girl
Welllllll, not always.......sorry Quintease, I have to disagree with one part of what you said. (though I normally agree with so much of what you say and enjoy your posts! So forgive me  )
"Lesbians have traditionally all tried to look like each other in order to be visible or did bf, which was a sexual dynamic"
Maybe I am being too picky. I don't know how long ago you mean by "traditionally", but if you go back to say the 1960's, 1950's, and before, (the pre-Stonewall years), all lesbians were butch or femme, that was that. Butch/femme wasn't a subset of LGBTQ, or a sexual dynamic. (LGBTQ didn't exist) Lesbian and b/f were one in the same. (Lee Lynch, my favorite author, has written wonderful books about this) So we weren't all trying to look the same back then. If you were a lesbian, you were either butch or femme, period.
OK, I'll shut up now. I'll stop being such a librarian about it. 
|
Yes but did individual lesbians have a choice? Invariably no. Butches all looked butch and femmes all looked femme. It was a very heteronormative and rigid way of establishing identity, particularly if you wanted to get laid. I imagine many lesbians today would be stumped were they to be asked to pick a side (remembering that dress back then also corresponded to sexual activity far more than it does today).
__________________
It is not worth an intelligent person's time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.
|
|
|