05-10-2012, 09:43 PM
|
#22
|
Member
How Do You Identify?: *Fierce Femme
Preferred Pronoun?: She
Relationship Status: Singular
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Southwest
Posts: 1,029
Thanks: 650
Thanked 4,460 Times in 854 Posts
Rep Power: 21474851
|
I agree 100% with everything you said
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetJane
I was a La Leche League leader. I breastfed both of my children. Both until they were about 2 1/2. By that time it wasn't for food or antibodies as much as it was at bedtime to calm them from a busy day or when they were ill. I also practiced attachment parenting, but we never called it that---it was simply good mothering, being attentive to your child, realizing their was a reason why they cried, and putting their needs first as you slowly helped them to become very independent human beings---and both of mine were.
I did support other mothers who nursed their children far longer than that. It was their particular choice and usually varied from child to child.
I nursed my children in public, usually under a pretty shawl.
But I never could understand why some people thought even knowing what your child was doing under that shawl was somehow offensive. Especially, since some of these same people wore clothing that showed more than I ever did.
I never wanted to feed my babies in a public restroom. How would you like to have spaghetti in a bathroom?
I do think the Time cover was provocative and meant to create controversy. That's a sad shame really because it puts a lot of mothers in a bad light because they choose to nurse a child beyond a year and it casts a cloud over the content of the article about attentive mothering.
|
|
|
|