Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Lady_Snow
When someone who is not in the culture and uses that cultures labels, definitions, genders, traditions, etc etc it IS appropriation.
Sometimes I want to look at white folk and ask:
Really? you also want macha, stud, Pappi? Really?
Cause you don't own enough already?
Thanks Dapper for saying something.
|
I completely agree with you and
I feel like a younger generation of queers (regardless of race) adopting an ID like 'Stud' has less of an icky appropriation feeling than if they were to co-opt 'Macha', 'Pappi' or 'Aggressive' because while 'Stud' has historically been used by queer POC it feels less connected to a single group or culture. 'Aggressive', 'Macha' and 'Pappi' would feel like really icky appropriation to me, because those IDs feel very specific and very closely tied to culture, to me.
'Stud' (noun) and stud (adjective) crosses a few cultures and common uses. It's not uncommon, for example, for it to be used as a descriptor for many different male sub-groups. Just like 'Butch' is commonly used as both an identity and a descriptor in gay-male and heterosexual male communities.
But, I do come from a place of white privilege and I recognize my feelings on this could be an example of that privilege, I'm completely open to hearing if people feel differently.