12-14-2012, 07:26 AM
|
#2802
|
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?: Biological female. Lesbian.
Relationship Status: Happy
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hanging out in the Atlantic.
Posts: 9,234
Thanks: 9,840
Thanked 34,630 Times in 7,640 Posts
Rep Power: 21474861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomad
when i listened to the news story, that (in red) is what stood out to me also. complete lack of explanation for those of us who, depending on identity, show no signs of being more or less masculinized or feminized. i'm getting really tired of the stereotyping.
and it's not Adam and Eve and the apple i'm worried about. it's the extremists who will now start looking for the gene they want to weed out in order to have straight kids. i've already heard one "see, homosexuality is a birth defect" story that resulted from this research. next thing you know, fundamentalists everywhere will start swamping abortion clinics when they find out their baby carries the "gay gene".
wait. fundamentalists. abortion clinics? 
|
I hear you. The problem gets to be, as usual, people dont understand the "science". But, they use their misunderstanding to support a position.
From my understanding, this is a theory not a proven fact. And it is not a gene per se but the epi marker that determines how a gene is expressed. And they are postulating that the epi marker when over exposed or underexposed to testosterone may influence sexual orientation. Thats a boatload of maybes.
Even the scientists say "it is the most plausible explanation". Thats not fact, but scientific conjecture.
Do fundamentalists believe in abortion?
__________________
|
|
|