Senior Member
How Do You Identify?: Femme
Preferred Pronoun?: She, please
Relationship Status: Loved Up
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western MA
Posts: 2,183
Thanks: 9,001
Thanked 6,554 Times in 1,553 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853
|
This is a good article and I'm really-really glad there is a wave of new press articles being done on Queer Immigration; but I have to say the title of the article irks me. And while I'm very pleased the NYT wrote/published this piece I feel they should have shown more care, the title suggests that the writer did not understand the issue.
Using the term "shortcut" in the title makes it sound as though the legal immigration issues queer binational couples face are merely irritating or perhaps tiresome, "Oh dear, darling, I guess we'll have to take the long way 'round since they've blocked off that avenue".
But the truth is, our complete lack of legal rights has nothing to do with "shortcuts", there are no legal protections or legal options in the United States that allow a foreign national partner to remain in the country based upon their relationship, none. zero. And there never have been any.
And the idea that there are "shortcuts" to green cards for anyone (queer or otherwise) is also laughable in this climate of rampant xenophobia and locked down borders.
__________________
I am made of stars
|