02-27-2013, 08:03 AM
|
#2992
|
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?: Biological female. Lesbian.
Relationship Status: Happy
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hanging out in the Atlantic.
Posts: 9,234
Thanks: 9,840
Thanked 34,630 Times in 7,640 Posts
Rep Power: 21474861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nat
I wouldn't mind moving from alphabet soup but I'm not keen calling myself a "diversity" nor do I prefer using terms that emphasize sex over other elements that make up orientation. We are already overly sexualized in the public sphere. I hate it when I hear people talk about "what people do in the privacy of their own bedroom" as though that's the sum total of what LGBQ folks are.
|
Was thinking something similar. Makes it sound like people are being grouped into 2 categories i.e. cis and hetero or some kind of diverse. Kind of like a "separate but equal" gender/sexual orientation thing - and we know how well that worked out in race relations.
I am not fond of grouping gender with sexual orientation. And something about gender/sexual diversities is a little to close to gender/sexual deviancy or dysphoria.
I dont know if continuing to see ourselves as "separate from" or "different from" is advantageous or empowering. Just seems to be another way of reinforcing the status quo.
__________________
|
|
|