07-18-2013, 08:55 PM
|
#12
|
Member
How Do You Identify?: femme woman
Preferred Pronoun?: she
Relationship Status: solo
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 905
Thanks: 302
Thanked 2,153 Times in 659 Posts
Rep Power: 16642920
|
Hmmmmmn
Hmmmn ... think that gentleman is a little late in the development of his thinking. Royal procreation using "donor" sperm of one kind or another has probably already happened a time or two over the centuries, LOL.
Don't see that same sex marriage has much to do with a lesbian queen having a child through insemination. The British monarchy is rather notorious for having children outside of the bonds of matrimony. The pressure is on for ANY monarch to reproduce. Soon cloning will be an available option for either king or queen to reproduce without contribution from anyone other than themselves. Till then the "other" parent will be a problem. Are Royals from other countries likely to want to ship their sperm/eggs to another country for procreation by the monarch there? Hmmmn, THAT may already have happened as well. my my my!
Smooches,
Keri
Quote:
Originally Posted by Words
Some idiot (Conservative of course) politician pointed out that there is now the possibility that we could one day have a lesbian queen provide us with a heir to the throne through artificial insemination.
He said it like it would be a bad thing! LOL...
Words
|
|
|
|