Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelt
Miss Tick
I notice the last three articles you have shared about economics do not have links to the original articles or any attribution/citation. I see you have provided them for other articles. Could you please provide them for these?
You are bolding and highlighting portions, were they originally written and published this way?
I like to know sources/have context since this is a news thread.
Thanks
|
No they were not originally written and published bolded or highlighted. I bolded and highlighted certain portions for emphasis. Although the emphasis is mine, they are otherwise written exactly as I posted.
Sorry for forgetting the links to the original articles. It was not purposeful. It's caused by my rushing through what I'm doing so I can be doing something else. A recurring issue of mine. I promise to watch more carefully in the future. And thank you for your interest. Here are the links in order of first to last.
http://www.alternet.org/hard-times-u...ory-capitalism
http://www.alternet.org/labor/where-...ere-its-headed
http://www.alternet.org/economy/lehm...rs-anniversary
Oh wait, I forgot this. The part in blue in the first article "8 groups most screwed over" is mine. It is this part
"(the fact that it's only almost for single females reflects the lower wages for most women relative to men)" but it is referenced later in the article in the section entitled Women, "The average American woman's retirement account is 38 percent less than a man's, and women over 65 have twice the poverty rate of men." I should be more clear that when I post articles I put anything I have to say in blue. Like in post 3205. I should maybe add that whenever I post something in my own words near or in an article. Sorry.