Quote:
Originally Posted by PearlsNLace
My positition is that there is no law, no war, no defense against addiction outside of education.
My postition is pro regulation, not because it will be an addiction deterrent. But because it would provide better resources for the addictions that will happen, no matter how they are accessed.
My positition is that laws criminalizing chemicals compounds, not prevents, the complicated problems of addictions.
My position is that the war on drugs does nothing to prevent addiction, and has only profitted the wrong people.
My postition is that ESPECIALLY for our community, education is vital, alternative social outlets that are NOT chemically centered are essential, and that our members suffer harsher consequences in our current legal system when caught.
Is that more clear?
|
Thanks Miss Pearls. I do get what you are saying. I don't see addiction(s) ever going away. Legal or not folks are still going to do illegal things to get drugs. Percocet is legal and how many folks sell their scripts on the street? Know what I mean?
I guess legalizing it all does remove it more from the hands of "dealers" and puts it back into the hands of the government. It will also make the "outlaws" just find new illegal drugs. I think a huge part of the whole drug lure is IN it's illegality. Part of the "gangster" ( outlaw/ rebel/ moonshiner/ anti-authority) mindset.
I guess my biggest thing is seeing access to helpful medicinal drugs more readily available and not necessarily the narcotics, etc.