02-19-2010, 02:17 PM
|
#4
|
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?: Woman
Preferred Pronoun?: HER - SHE
Relationship Status: Relating
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CA & AZ I'm a Snowbird
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 11,826
Thanked 10,830 Times in 3,200 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toughy
How about this............
Keep the filibuster and make the opposing party actually filibuster...........as in 24/7 talk.........bring in the cots and the phones books and the dictionaries.
The threat of filibuster is very different from actually caring it out. Call them on it...........make them filibuster in the true sense of the word rather than threatening a filibuster. If the opposing party wants to actually grind governing to a halt then make them do it...........talk, talk, talk, talk,..........
Let the voters see first hand what filibuster means. Come the next Nov elections, the voters will have a clear cut choice.
|
I know, I have thought about this too. Call them on it!! It seems to me that would be the last straw for people (no matter what party). Would demonstrate just how , destructive, and counter-productive the filibuster (or, threat of it) can be. It has a place, but, the GOP has stopped Senate business 112 times since Obam took office!
I am so frustrated with these idiots (both sides - neither is my side). And now that corporations will be able to buy elections (even in secret - plans of how to hide their edge are in the works), my faith in our legislative institutions is just gone.
Argh.. don't even get me started on the opening day of the CPAC Convention.... thinking a 2012 presidential ticket will have another Cheny - Liz Cheny!!! But, I digress...
|
|
|