07-02-2011, 01:26 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
bigender Preferred Pronoun?:
whatevs Relationship Status:
in a relationship Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tx
Posts: 3,535
Thanks: 11,042
Thanked 13,986 Times in 2,593 Posts
Rep Power: 21474854 |
Questions of Ethics
I asked this on my facebook page after hearing it on a Philosphy Bites podcast, and the question took off pretty well. So I'll ask it here:
A train is coming down the tracks and will hit 5 people and kill them - unless a bystander - who is standing next to a switch that would move the train to another track - decides to flip this switch. If s/he does this, only one person would be killed. Should the bystander flip the switch? I think you need to probably imagine that none of these folks are people you know. They are all of the same value to you - all strangers, all the same age, all law-abiding, all in the same state of health, etc. in order to do real justice to this question. You would also need to imagine that the bystander knows that if he throws the switch, the train will behave in the way it's supposed to. BUT, it would be interesting also to hear what variables would influence you regarding whether the bystander should throw the switch.
__________________
I'm a fountain of blood. In the shape of a girl. - Bjork What is to give light must endure burning. -Viktor Frankl
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Nat For This Useful Post: |
07-02-2011, 02:40 AM | #2 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Queer femme submissive Relationship Status:
Married Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 969
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 4,263 Times in 678 Posts
Rep Power: 21474851 |
I can't answer as to what the bystander 'should' do, because I don't believe anyone has the right to decide what another 'should' do in such a situation.
If, however, the bystander were me, no, I wouldn't flip the switch (or at least I *think* I wouldn't). It would be awful living with the knowledge that I could have prevented the death of five people, worse still, though, knowing that I'd sent someone to their death who otherwise would have lived. That said....until something like this were to actually happen, there's no way on earth of knowing what I would do, only what I think I would probably do. Words |
07-02-2011, 07:00 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Light Butch Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
Hitched to Red Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,528
Thanks: 2,261
Thanked 5,380 Times in 1,245 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
If I read this correctly you are talking about "Normative Ethics" which addresses how one should act morally deciding what is right or wrong in regards to ones actions.
I would have to say that I would not flip the switch because there is no way for me to absolutely know that 5 people are going to die and what the true outcome of my action would be. This question seems to touch on the following. Do we react or act in a situation. A reaction is often described as an emotional action while an action is described as a thought out action. So many factors have not been uncovered that saying I would automatically flip the switch is not agreeable for me.
__________________
"Until one has loved an animal, a part of one's soul remains unawake." ~ Anatole France |
07-02-2011, 08:03 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
m'lady Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,000
Thanks: 1,834
Thanked 6,231 Times in 1,462 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853 |
This is actually a pretty "famous" philosophical debate....countless papers have been written changing the variables to see if that would change the outcome, for example, the five are criminals the one is not. Or, the one is young where the five are old. I have to confess I've never debated the question when the potential victims were on an even playing field.
I don't know that I would flip the switch...because I don't think I have a right to decide who will live and who will die. I would leave it to fate, or destiny, or God, or whatever higher power one believes in. Now, I am gonna call myself out and say my logic is flawed because if it were only one person on the track and I could flip the switch and save them...I would. And in that way I WOULD be deciding whether they live or die. Sigh...just call my logic fickle I guess.
__________________
Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing there is a field. I'll meet you there ~ Rumi |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to always2late For This Useful Post: |
07-02-2011, 08:44 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
She, please Relationship Status:
Loved Up Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Western MA
Posts: 2,183
Thanks: 9,001
Thanked 6,591 Times in 1,556 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853 |
Assuming I knew the consequences of both action or inaction...
I would flip the switch. And I wouldn't see myself as "playing god" by doing it. I'm a bystander being given the knowledge and tools to make this decision, if I don't make an active decision no one else will and tragedy will occur either way. My rationale is a simple matter of numbers. One person dead, and the lives of one network of people changed forever. Or five people, and five networks of people changed forever. I would want to minimize the tragedy. Given the opportunity I would rather make an active choice than stand by and watch.
__________________
I am made of stars |
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Sparkle For This Useful Post: |
07-02-2011, 09:04 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Understated butch. Preferred Pronoun?:
I Relationship Status:
Party of One Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,654
Thanks: 1,324
Thanked 3,112 Times in 1,103 Posts
Rep Power: 21474851 |
Thinking aloud.
I would torture myself in the dilemma until it was too late. So... I guess that means 5 die, instead of the one, which I think would qualify as a decision in this scenario.
I don't think I could deliberately turn a train toward a person, regardless of where it was headed to start with. On the other hand, if I place Young Son among the 5, well, yes, I would instinctively turn it. And in the reverse situation, I wouldn't turn it, of course. I'm not sure how much, if any of this, falls into the category of morality as I think we're defining it here. In the latter condition, instinctively is a key word.
__________________
Really? That's not funny to you? |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to tapu For This Useful Post: |
07-02-2011, 09:12 AM | #7 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femmesensual Transguy Preferred Pronoun?:
He, Him, His Relationship Status:
Dating Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rio Vista, CA
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 3,949
Thanked 3,220 Times in 757 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
I would flip it if I was certain of the outcome. One death is better than five in my view. That being said, the reason I would flip it would be the determining factor with respect to whether this would be a moral action or not, not the outcome. Morality is ultimately rooted in intent.
|
07-02-2011, 12:53 PM | #8 |
Practically Lives Here
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
dee Relationship Status:
Hitched up Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Livin’ the Dream
Posts: 24,079
Thanks: 30,560
Thanked 54,939 Times in 13,921 Posts
Rep Power: 21474873 |
Yes how would I know the outcome? If I knew for sure I'd flip it.
Came back to edit: the question was should the flipper flip the flip switch, Yes. The flipper should. There are so many variables, what if the one person killed were a child, or wheelchair bound or whatever.. it could be debated throughout infinity. I am assuming this is even playing field. |
The Following User Says Thank You to girl_dee For This Useful Post: |
07-02-2011, 01:02 PM | #9 | ||
Practically Lives Here
How Do You Identify?:
Queer Stone Femme Girl of the Unicorn Variety Preferred Pronoun?:
She, as in 'She's a GEM' Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The roads are narrow here
Posts: 36,631
Thanks: 182,485
Thanked 108,775 Times in 25,689 Posts
Rep Power: 21474887 |
Quote:
So, that leaves me with a very simple issue. Are 5 lives the same as 1 life? Assuming that all are, as mentioned, on an even playing field...one is not a criminal/priest/mother/child/etc...then no, they are not the same. Five people have five times the ability to heal, nuture, teach, hurt, help, aggravate, charm, or amuse as one person. There are five lifelines versus one that would be majorly affected by the outcome of this. I choose quantity, since the quality has been pre-determined as equal. Quote:
I see myself "playing God" if I DON'T flip the switch, actually. It's only humane to want to help another in a crisis. |
||
07-02-2011, 01:33 PM | #10 |
Timed Out
How Do You Identify?:
yes dear Preferred Pronoun?:
she Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: south florida
Posts: 2,494
Thanks: 3,264
Thanked 6,737 Times in 1,777 Posts
Rep Power: 0 |
this may be a derail...
what if the one person was YOU! would those that said they'd flip the switch STILL flip it? how about those who didnt answer--would you sacrifice yourself to save 5 others--without ANY knowledge about those 5?
|
The Following User Says Thank You to scootebaby For This Useful Post: |
07-02-2011, 02:55 PM | #11 | |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Transmasculine/Non-Binary Preferred Pronoun?:
Hy (Pronounced He) Relationship Status:
Married Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 6,589
Thanks: 21,132
Thanked 8,162 Times in 2,006 Posts
Rep Power: 21474857 |
Quote:
I believe this would be my decision; If they were children or young adults, yes. If the others were adults, I don't know.
__________________
Sometimes you don't realize your own strength until you come face to face with your greatest weakness. - Susan Gale |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Greyson For This Useful Post: |
07-02-2011, 03:02 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Light Butch Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
Hitched to Red Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,528
Thanks: 2,261
Thanked 5,380 Times in 1,245 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
__________________
"Until one has loved an animal, a part of one's soul remains unawake." ~ Anatole France |
07-02-2011, 03:06 PM | #13 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femmesensual Transguy Preferred Pronoun?:
He, Him, His Relationship Status:
Dating Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rio Vista, CA
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 3,949
Thanked 3,220 Times in 757 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
Yes I probably would sacrifice myself to save 5 others I don't know.
|
07-02-2011, 03:18 PM | #14 |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Woman Preferred Pronoun?:
HER - SHE Relationship Status:
Relating Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CA & AZ I'm a Snowbird
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 11,826
Thanked 10,828 Times in 3,200 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
I would most likely flip the switch. Then try to figure out how to live with myself.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AtLast For This Useful Post: |
07-02-2011, 03:19 PM | #15 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Hardcore bullheaded grown-ass Tomboy Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
she loves my shaggy hair Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The backroom of a night cafe plotting world domination
Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 3,300 Times in 568 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
As I said on Nat's FB I would throw the switch, purely because 5 ppl dead as a result of my inaction seems worse than 1 person dead because of my action... feels the lesser of two evils.
Either way there is a choice to make, to act or not... both carrying substantial consequence and for me the bottom line would be how many will be alive after I make it, 1 or 5. And as I said before, if it was me on the other tracks frankly ... hell no I wouldn't, never pretended to be a saint Heh, excellent Natalie, should be interesting.
__________________
.......... In the depth of winter I finally learned that there was in me an invincible summer. ~Albert Camus
|
07-02-2011, 03:30 PM | #16 |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Human Preferred Pronoun?:
He Relationship Status:
Very Married Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Where I want to be
Posts: 8,155
Thanks: 47,491
Thanked 29,291 Times in 6,640 Posts
Rep Power: 21474859 |
I'd flip the switch, even if I were the one. All things being equal and putting the train back on it's normal course.
__________________
"Many proposals have been made to us to adopt your laws, your religion, your manners and your customs. We would be better pleased with beholding the good effects of these doctrines in your own practices, than with hearing you talk about them".
~Old Tassel, Chief of the Tsalagi (Cherokee) |
07-02-2011, 06:23 PM | #17 | |
Practically Lives Here
How Do You Identify?:
Queer Stone Femme Girl of the Unicorn Variety Preferred Pronoun?:
She, as in 'She's a GEM' Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The roads are narrow here
Posts: 36,631
Thanks: 182,485
Thanked 108,775 Times in 25,689 Posts
Rep Power: 21474887 |
Quote:
And, yes, I would save 5 others even if it meant my own demise. |
|
07-02-2011, 06:51 PM | #18 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
asleep at the synthesizer Preferred Pronoun?:
crown prince of dirty disco Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: the dollar bin
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 2,082
Thanked 1,767 Times in 851 Posts
Rep Power: 21474851 |
all things being equal, i don't think there is enough information to make an ethical argument for or against.
that said i'm a staunch believer in personal accountability. if a bunch of people want to hang around the train tracks, with out regard for personal safety or the dilemma they have put a bystander in, they have made their own decision and are solely accountable. |
07-02-2011, 07:35 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Understated butch. Preferred Pronoun?:
I Relationship Status:
Party of One Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,654
Thanks: 1,324
Thanked 3,112 Times in 1,103 Posts
Rep Power: 21474851 |
I came back in here because when I was doing other things just now, I kept picturing these fleeting scenarios of two diverging train tracks, and on one set were 5 oldsters tottering around, and on the other was this little toddler beseeching me with arms up. I'd have to say I'm pretty sure that, in the depths of my unconscious, the toddler was starting to pull ahead of the pack.
__________________
Really? That's not funny to you? |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tapu For This Useful Post: |
07-02-2011, 07:40 PM | #20 | |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
pushy broad Preferred Pronoun?:
she Relationship Status:
Follow your heart; it knows things your mind cannot explain. Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southeast corner
Posts: 5,633
Thanks: 24,417
Thanked 25,409 Times in 4,660 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
Quote:
When it's the 5 versus 1 and I live either way...I'm not so sure. I tend to think I'd lean towards saving 5 lives by sacrificing one...but I also think sacrificing the one would feel like murder if I took an action that caused their death. Not sure if I could do that...
__________________
I'm not tall enough to ride emotional roller coasters
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JustJo For This Useful Post: |
|
|