12-09-2009, 08:43 PM | #1 |
Timed Out - Permanent
How Do You Identify?:
decidedly indifferent Preferred Pronoun?:
other Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Patrick Springs, VA
Posts: 2,812
Thanks: 9,247
Thanked 5,703 Times in 1,684 Posts
Rep Power: 0 |
Exclusion: A Women's Issue?
The topic of this thread may seem initially offensive and I pray that is not the case. I see it as a very timely and perhaps imperative discussion to host in this , if not every, LGBT ( et al) community. I see growing pains happening left and right and many folks attempting to touch on the very "touchy" subject of needing and requesting separate space for discussions, etc and not quite being able to " get there".
We as a whole are primarily female ( body) born individuals( whether we agree with that biological fact or are unfortunate to have been "misplaced" in that body) who have chosen a melange of venues with which to express our inner selves. We are MTF's ,FTM's ,gay, queer, trans-sexual-sensual-gendered-continental. Our common denominator is the "female" or "woman" somewhere within us. Sometimes surfaced and sometimes tucked away and less "up front". The experiences we have or have had as these "females" is what connects us. If not, I ask , what is? I think it is amazing that so many people with such vast life experience can gather within this ( and other similar) spaces and become so very close in our sharing. It is equally amazing, that we often fraction ourselves off defensively rather than allowing for .. no.. "praising" the differences with the respect that can sometimes only come with respectful "exclusion". Please understand, when I use the term exclusion, it is not without a great sense of dread as we ( women, whether current or former or yet to become) do not "allow" ourselves this privilege. I dread being misunderstood or seen as a "separatist" or discriminatory or any other variety of words that someone looking to take issue with could find. This is my fear... being a woman who is not allowed to "choose" to talk with or be with those whom I choose or moreover.. "without" the voices I don't currently wish to hear in said discussion/ activity. I have witnessed this in threads from femmes, from female identified butches, from transexuals, from transgendered, from People of Color, from religion based groups, from political groups.. The list goes on within female born communities. It seems as if we don't feel our voices worthy enough to just say " this is for ______ not for _______" That should be enough. I observe we as humans, share our space daily with all kinds of "others" and mostly we either gain from that sharing or we have moments of oppression for it. Why is it so hard for us to say "I want some time with _______ and while I love you... go away for a while" ? It is often the knowing smile of a familiar that gets us through the day. Why not demand time for that? I think , personally, that many of the issues that we see become so heated in so many threads might become resolved if we allow one another the space to just be those separate facets of ourselves without interruption. If femmes or transmen or female id'ed butches need a thread for themselves, just own it. Name it and claim it! We have an entire site, or world ,for that matter to meet back on common ground. Perhaps we will be stronger individuals to add to the collective if we take our opportunities to gather our strength. I imagine a world of strong people coming together to claim what is and should be ours. If parts of the whole need to take some time out now and then to be with like folks to make that happen, Blessed Be! Exclusion is not a wholly bad thing. We do not have to invite everyone to every party. These are just some thoughts I have been stewing over in the past month or so of observing many thread of thoughts expressed on line. I think there is room and love enough for everyone. I also think there can be respect enough to allow for time/ space for "just us".. whomever the "us" is. Without trying to "step on toes" and also not trying to "tiptoe around a situation" I think there are simple ways we can make this happen without doing either. EX: A user has a discussion for "femmes".. go to femme zone, post it with disclaimer "for femmes only". That should be simple enough to respect. If someone other than a femme wishes to follow it, do so.. post a "thanks" for something they like, but refrain from commenting unless choosing to do so in private. This is of course, just suggestion. This could allow for private conversing without derailing threads or anyone feeling "silenced" or "invisible". It will possibly also allow the original conversation to flow on its intended course. Again.... just thought from yet one of a million observers. I thank you all for taking the time to read/ respond/ discuss. Respectfully, Jess |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Jess For This Useful Post: |
12-09-2009, 09:07 PM | #2 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
A Force with which to be reckoned Preferred Pronoun?:
just be nice... Relationship Status:
I call her Mine Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Transplanted to the PNW
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 2,552
Thanked 2,476 Times in 706 Posts
Rep Power: 14753261 |
I think that this is a very timely topic and I am not asskissing just because I adore you... you, of all people, know better than that...
Its been two very long work days for me and I can't seem to gather my thoughts on this... will be back to post when I am more coherent. |
12-09-2009, 09:11 PM | #3 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme Preferred Pronoun?:
she Relationship Status:
I'm with goofy. Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 911
Thanks: 962
Thanked 2,376 Times in 616 Posts
Rep Power: 15632316 |
Quote:
What's your point? How are we NOT doing this already? You referenced in your post numerous threads where this is exactly what's going on. We ARE requesting dialogue without "other" voices. So, according to your guidelines, the subgroups that seek a forum to discuss issues without interruption from "other" voices (because so often those "other" voices are very silencing) now should STILL put up with the "others" and NOT disagree publicly? These subgroups must, yet again, refrain? Really? Here's a thought... If one chooses to post in an "only" thread, it is THAT POSTER'S responsibility to read the entire thread and engage respectfully. It is NOT a space to claim or demand everyone dance to your tune. Jess, I'm pissy about this, but I think your intentions are good. I also know from traveling the boards for awhile that I have learned a lot from reading the dialogue of disagreements. We've all seen minds and attitudes change. If we disallow arguments, then we lose a resource for analyzing ourselves.
__________________
"We never forget those who make us blush." Jean-Francois de la Harpe |
|
12-09-2009, 09:17 PM | #4 | |
Timed Out - Permanent
How Do You Identify?:
decidedly indifferent Preferred Pronoun?:
other Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Patrick Springs, VA
Posts: 2,812
Thanks: 9,247
Thanked 5,703 Times in 1,684 Posts
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Your tone sounds hostile and defensive simultaneously and apparently we may be speaking a different language. I never suggested anyone "put up" with anything... Quite the opposite, actually. At any rate.. really sorry my words obviously do not make themselves clear enough for your ears. |
|
12-09-2009, 09:25 PM | #5 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme Preferred Pronoun?:
she Relationship Status:
I'm with goofy. Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 911
Thanks: 962
Thanked 2,376 Times in 616 Posts
Rep Power: 15632316 |
Quote:
Reconsider?
__________________
"We never forget those who make us blush." Jean-Francois de la Harpe |
|
12-09-2009, 09:40 PM | #6 |
Timed Out - Permanent
How Do You Identify?:
decidedly indifferent Preferred Pronoun?:
other Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Patrick Springs, VA
Posts: 2,812
Thanks: 9,247
Thanked 5,703 Times in 1,684 Posts
Rep Power: 0 |
I appreciate your addition and on one hand agree that often arguments can be healthy discourse. I do still think there is absolutely nothing wrong with saying a space is exclusive, unless it is excluding the advancement of person or group of people.
I think that other groups or individuals can still learn quietly by observing and asking direct questions privately, without disrupting an entire thread. Is it a woman's need to absolutely "include" or a weakness to fear "excluding"? This is what I am trying to ascertain. Thank you, blush. |
12-09-2009, 10:01 PM | #7 |
Timed Out
How Do You Identify?:
Trans Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,723
Thanks: 109
Thanked 282 Times in 178 Posts
Rep Power: 0 |
What about other threads on the websites that are age related? Like say someone posting in the 30's thread and they arent even in their 30's, would that be exclusion?
|
12-09-2009, 10:09 PM | #8 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
just me Preferred Pronoun?:
he Relationship Status:
This seat is taken Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Buckeye
Posts: 210
Thanks: 180
Thanked 274 Times in 119 Posts
Rep Power: 227088 |
I agree. Claim it and name it. Own it and be clear up front which group the thread is reserved for or which groups are being invited to post.
|
12-09-2009, 10:18 PM | #9 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femmesensual Transguy Preferred Pronoun?:
He, Him, His Relationship Status:
Dating Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rio Vista, CA
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 3,949
Thanked 3,221 Times in 757 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
The only thing that would bother me in a sub-group only thread is if there is untrue or over-generalized things said about another sub-group. Then that other sub-group can't say anything about that. It just hangs there in the air un-answered. Other than that, I think it's awesome to have "only" spaces for particular sub-groups, if they felt a need for it.
|
12-10-2009, 12:02 AM | #10 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Lesbian Princess Preferred Pronoun?:
Female Pronouns Relationship Status:
Single but also non negotiably non monogamous Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bay Area Gal!
Posts: 142
Thanks: 47
Thanked 270 Times in 77 Posts
Rep Power: 687705 |
I too think this is a very timely thread, especially at the inception of a new online home. I applaud you for putting it out there that we should be able to designate and start discussions with those we share experience with, without opinions of those who have different experiences. AND NOT FEEL BAD ABOUT IT. I don't think it a weakness to fear excluding, I think it comes from the fact that we are always having to fight for equality/inclusion in the rest of the world that we sometimes forget that we might need to create spaces for ourselves every now and again to as you said gather our strength. And then many times if we do create such spaces, we are met with negativity and said that we are being discriminatory.
|
12-10-2009, 12:49 AM | #11 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Hardcore bullheaded grown-ass Tomboy Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
she loves my shaggy hair Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The backroom of a night cafe plotting world domination
Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 3,299 Times in 568 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
Quote:
To me that sounds like an assumption that a "sub-group's" discussion need be policed specifically by "the other group". I personally believe there's enough decent peeps that derogatory comments about others wouldn't just go unchecked...
__________________
.......... In the depth of winter I finally learned that there was in me an invincible summer. ~Albert Camus
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jett For This Useful Post: |
12-10-2009, 01:18 AM | #12 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Hardcore bullheaded grown-ass Tomboy Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
she loves my shaggy hair Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The backroom of a night cafe plotting world domination
Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 3,299 Times in 568 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
Quote:
I'm in the middle I know peeps are gonna take advantage... but I also feel like there are those that will cut that off at the pass. *ever an optipessimist* Metro
__________________
.......... In the depth of winter I finally learned that there was in me an invincible summer. ~Albert Camus
|
|
12-10-2009, 01:32 AM | #13 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femmesensual Transguy Preferred Pronoun?:
He, Him, His Relationship Status:
Dating Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rio Vista, CA
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 3,949
Thanked 3,221 Times in 757 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
I guess my point is that some things that are said about my particular sub group I have seen in other threads that are meant to be for other sub groups. These things, I believe are well intentioned, but leave me feeling like there are now assumptions about me simply because a few people in my sub group are jerks. I don't feel its appropriate for me to speak up in these threads, cause they are not for me. Yet, I feel like some very unfair things are being said that reflect negatively on me, just on the basis of my belonging to my sub group.
Now I don't tend to report a post unless something egregious has been said, something really awful. I don't report other posts with shades of grey because I don't think that is fair, and a lot of good people with good intentions say things sometimes that fall flat. I usually go into the thread and ask them to clarify what they truly mean. But in the case of threads that aren't for my sub group, I can't do that, otherwise I am perceived to be violating someone's space. I don't want to violate anything. And I refuse to report a post that is in that grey area, either. So I guess a pm to the OP is all I can do, but then what I find to be unfair in the thread goes unanswered in the thread, and I guess there's nothing I can do about that. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to atomiczombie For This Useful Post: |
12-10-2009, 01:46 AM | #14 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Hardcore bullheaded grown-ass Tomboy Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
she loves my shaggy hair Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The backroom of a night cafe plotting world domination
Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 3,299 Times in 568 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
Quote:
__________________
.......... In the depth of winter I finally learned that there was in me an invincible summer. ~Albert Camus
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jett For This Useful Post: |
12-10-2009, 02:25 AM | #15 | |
Timed Out
How Do You Identify?:
Seerauber, Centaurita Bonita, QoQonut, Volupté Suprême Preferred Pronoun?:
Lux, Ms. Lisbon if you're nasty. Relationship Status:
Left of Centaur and blissfully betrothed. Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Happily swooning by the big, blue sea.
Posts: 171
Thanks: 50
Thanked 375 Times in 63 Posts
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
That said, I believe, that it is possible for different groups of people to maintain safe space in order to share mutual, lived, experience and still build bridges with their allies. To me, wanting to retain a little "personal" space within a bigger community is not about exclusion. I think it's about folks like you bearing witness to your experiences, without interruption, so that you have the fortitude and patience to build better bridges (and just be able to live) outside of that safe space. I know that as an artist, I crave the company and insight of other artists sometimes. Sometimes I want to have a conversation about an issue I'm dealing with as an artist with other people who "get it" sans background story or explanations. This doesn't exclude the fact that I still love and need my non-artist patrons, allies, and friends. I think the same is true of gender identities. While I know it can be hard to feel as though you're "sitting on your hands", I think we can all work to be better allies to those who identify differently than we do. Repping people, sending supportive p.m.s, starting threads that extend an effort to engage in thoughtful dialogue, are all powerful, though seemingly small ways, to let people know that they've been heard and that you respect their self expression. Vis a vis, consistently being a good ally, and proceeding from a place of respect and kindness can have a huge impact on changing the way people think about you and people like you. The good ones (and most are at heart) always come around and that creates community. I think this site can provide an extremely positive atmosphere of mutual respect that will afford all of us a voice if we just let ourselves, and each other, be heard. Last edited by QueenofQueens; 12-10-2009 at 02:28 AM. |
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to QueenofQueens For This Useful Post: |
12-10-2009, 04:29 AM | #16 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Queer femme submissive Relationship Status:
Married Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 969
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 4,261 Times in 677 Posts
Rep Power: 21474851 |
I started a thread for submissives, making it very clear that that was what it was. Although it's not that active, submissives are posting, including several newly out submissives who consider it a safe enough space to post. The thread is therefore, in my opinion, a positive thread.
So, as the thread starter, what would I do if someone started using our safe space as an opportunity to take obvious pot shots at other groups who weren't in a position - because of the exclusive nature of the thread - to respond? Easy. I'd tell them it's not appropriate because safe, to me, implies maintaining a certain level of common decency, which includes not attacking -remember, I'm talking about extreme accusations here - folks who aren't in a position to defend themselves. And if that didn't work? I'd contact a. a mod., b. the admin., or c. the forum ambassador, depending on the scope of their involvement in individual threads, and ask them to intervene. What I wouldn't do is allow the thread to be de-railed by a pissing match. Words |
The Following User Says Thank You to Words For This Useful Post: |
12-10-2009, 07:54 AM | #17 |
Timed Out - Permanent
How Do You Identify?:
decidedly indifferent Preferred Pronoun?:
other Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Patrick Springs, VA
Posts: 2,812
Thanks: 9,247
Thanked 5,703 Times in 1,684 Posts
Rep Power: 0 |
Wow, I started this discussion just before turning in for the night and wake up to see a great conversation happening! Thanks everyone, for getting my intention!
Atomic, I def hear your point and as a couple of folks have already mentioned, there are ways to find your answers to a statement made without derailing or disrespecting the safe space another sub-group has created. Sending a respectful PM to the person who made the statement is not only a good way to get a direct answer without making that person feel "put on the spot" for something that could easily be a poor choice of words, but it could also result in making a new ally. There is that hope! In my personal experience, I have entered a space or two that weren't for "my" identification ( yet that was not stated) and made comments I felt innocuous and/or supportive and came to find out later that I should have probably never gone there. Had the thread clearly stated, this thread is for _________, I would have remained a silent observer. I have watched some threads for specific subgroups grapple with issues stemming from other subgroups ( as you, Atomic are speaking concern with), and have watched them "police" themselves perfectly well. I think when allowed to, most folks will eventually do the "right thing", even though the process my be difficult. They end up teaching and "hearing" one another better regarding the "tough issues", as they are coming from more similar space to have those discussions. Here is an example and I hope no one will take this in any way other than it is intended, an "example". A thread in the Femme Zone, brought up the topic of male- centric or masculine- centric behavior to discuss. My thought... if they are trying to discuss how it impacts their lives, they are not going to feel safe doing so if male or masculine identified persons start coming in and commenting. While the group ( or set of characteristics ) may hit home with me, it is not MY place to insert my comments there. I can instead A) write members who posted comments I wish to have clarified , B) start a discussion within MY group about how we may or may not be perceived C) start a discussion in an "open" space ( such as gender/ community) to discuss how we as a larger community view the issue or D) deal with it on my own. My point in opening up this discussion is to help ( hopefully) further the important discussions by reminding folks it really is "OK" to ask or demand your private spaces. I don't think we need to fear the "he man womans hater club" . The little rascals have grown up, and more often than not totally amaze me in their ability to work through situations that are "tough" with care, concern and openness . Thanks again for everyone who took the time to read and/or think about this. Jess |
12-10-2009, 08:37 AM | #18 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme Preferred Pronoun?:
she Relationship Status:
I'm with goofy. Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 911
Thanks: 962
Thanked 2,376 Times in 616 Posts
Rep Power: 15632316 |
Quote:
__________________
"We never forget those who make us blush." Jean-Francois de la Harpe |
|
12-10-2009, 08:44 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme Preferred Pronoun?:
sea shell Relationship Status:
married Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: san diego
Posts: 1,687
Thanks: 1,927
Thanked 4,377 Times in 1,015 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
exclusion/inclusion isn't a woman's issue.
'inclusion' is a human issue and 'exclusion' is all about perception--if someone feels 'entitled' to enter a space meant for like-minded/bodied/spirited-"others" it really speaks to that person's sense of *entitlement* and/or lack of respect/awareness. in femme-zone space, where the participants are attempting to *temporarily* remove the ever-present *butch* from the butch-and-femme, in an attempt to see/discuss/nuture/admire/tend to all that is FEMME, i do *not* feel unsafe by masculine participation rather, i am suspect of that masculine person's ability to participate in any effective manner and will wonder of that masculine-person's motivation--unless he/she does offer some amazing insight (and it really better be fucking amazing) because yes, masculine-energy in a femme-intended space alters the discussion, and frequently demonstrates that which we're intending to discuss. (...and this is something to consider because i imagine that no one wants to be "the bad example" ) |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to apretty For This Useful Post: |
12-10-2009, 09:11 AM | #20 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme Preferred Pronoun?:
she Relationship Status:
I'm with goofy. Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 911
Thanks: 962
Thanked 2,376 Times in 616 Posts
Rep Power: 15632316 |
Quote:
As I read it, your question seems to give the "lesser of two evils." On the one hand, if I say I have to "include," then I have an absolute need for approval. If I say I fear "excluding" then I am weak. Could you clarify that?
__________________
"We never forget those who make us blush." Jean-Francois de la Harpe |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|