NOM is disturbing

[WolfyOne]

I was reading an article and snipped this part out to read before you read the entire article ... Almost all of the 2012 Republican presidential candidates have signed onto NOM's pledge to support a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.


Here's the article, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/24/national-organization-marriage-disclosure-violations_n_935031.html?icid=maing-grid10%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl6%7Csec3_lnk1%7C88950

[ArkansasPiscesGrrl]

I was reading an article and snipped this part out to read before you read the entire article ... Almost all of the 2012 Republican presidential candidates have signed onto NOM's pledge to support a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.


Here's the article, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/24/national-organization-marriage-disclosure-violations_n_935031.html?icid=maing-grid10%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl6%7Csec3_lnk1%7C88950

Yeah, I had read the same article on Huffington Post. Not a surprise to me, either, but maybe I am just a die-hard cynically leaning Democrat. What also got me was the part of the article that spoke of how a case against NOM made it to the Supreme Court, and Justice Clarence Thomas sided with them against the whole idea of donor name disclosure. Let those freaks spend in the dark, right? Grrr

[Bad_boi]

Let me be the first to say-

No Nomming on my rights!