Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFemme
do you think it is my head injury or the cancer that makes me agree AND disagree with everyone lately? i feel so bi-polar.
|
(I, too, find myself in conflicting feeling on this regard.)
After reading through this thread last night, I really didn't think I would come back in to view anymore. Alas, I found myself thinking on this subject hard.
I did some research on the subject, and came to my own conclusions on this matter.
It is a proven fact that adds of this sort do stimulate pedephiles in a sexual manner.
Now with that being said; I am left with a few remaining questions...
#1. If it is the case where these images DO stimulate the responses of pedephiles, HOW CAN it be legal, let alone ALLOWED?
#2. Why is it that stores geared tword lower-income families have smut items in their clothing selections for children, when statistically speaking, most victims are FROM lower-income families? Coincidence? I'm leaning twords, NO. Or, should that be a "Hell NO!"?
Now, my most important question...
#3. How can ANY adult, in their right mind, think to make an add, in which a child is put into a sexual light? Is there something about the person developing the add we should know about? Maybe that individual needs to be checked for pedephile tendencies.
Once again, these are just my opinions.