![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Queer..in the queer deffinition of the queer meaning of the queer word... Preferred Pronoun?:
Mr. SuperTuff Relationship Status:
Things happen... Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 483
Thanks: 894
Thanked 684 Times in 293 Posts
Rep Power: 93006 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
After reading through this thread last night, I really didn't think I would come back in to view anymore. Alas, I found myself thinking on this subject hard. I did some research on the subject, and came to my own conclusions on this matter. It is a proven fact that adds of this sort do stimulate pedephiles in a sexual manner. Now with that being said; I am left with a few remaining questions... #1. If it is the case where these images DO stimulate the responses of pedephiles, HOW CAN it be legal, let alone ALLOWED? #2. Why is it that stores geared tword lower-income families have smut items in their clothing selections for children, when statistically speaking, most victims are FROM lower-income families? Coincidence? I'm leaning twords, NO. Or, should that be a "Hell NO!"? Now, my most important question... #3. How can ANY adult, in their right mind, think to make an add, in which a child is put into a sexual light? Is there something about the person developing the add we should know about? Maybe that individual needs to be checked for pedephile tendencies. Once again, these are just my opinions.
__________________
"Today we would pass through the scenes of our youth like travelers. We are burnt up by hard facts; like tradesmen we understand distinctions, and like butchers, necessities. We are no longer untroubled - we are indifferent. We might exist there; but, should we really live there?" ~Erich Maria Remarque "All Quiet on the Western Front" http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._4605968_n.jpg |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|