Quote:
Originally Posted by blush
Thanks, Nat!
I'm repeating my post from the "breeders" thread:
It's interesting to me that we stand united (myself included) about genital mutilation in girls, but we don't seem to be as horrified by foreskin removal in boy infants?
I didn't want to quote others who posted about it, but I hope they'll join in the conversation.
|
I just came across this thread and haven't seen any others about these issues. I'm not going to comment on the religious reasons for circumcision. I think of this as more of a medical issue. As a healthcare practitioner, I have to say that I don't think of male circumcision (removal of foreskin) as being comparible to the genital mutilation that is done to girls/women. Male circumcision is a way of decreasing risk of infection, including HIV. Female circumcision has not been shown to have
any health benefits. Also, female circumcision isn't usually just the removal of skin (ie, the hood of the clitoris) it can be the removal of the entire clitoris.
a link from Scientific American:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...-hiv-infection