12-23-2009, 03:12 PM
|
#252
|
Member
How Do You Identify?: ~
Preferred Pronoun?: ~
Relationship Status: ~
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ~
Posts: 424
Thanks: 461
Thanked 467 Times in 176 Posts
Rep Power: 274206
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BullDog
Anyone who doesn't want to id as a lesbian- fine and dandy. But some of these so-called definitions of lesbians and lesbian sex coming from non-identified lesbians are truly ridiculous and limited. Lesbians and our language have "evolved" just as much as the rest of the "advanced cutting edge gender identities"- queer/genderqueer etc.
I am real tired of the constant messages that lesbian and woman are somehow antiquated terms that others have evolved from.
I am real tired of how female, woman, lesbian are constantly being ridiculed and minimized in butch femme and queer communities- particularly when attached to butch
This post was written by a Proud Stone Butch Lesbian- who has female oriented sex because I am female and my intimate partners are female (I'm a homosexual, I'm queer, I'm lesbian), and yes I am stone too.
p.s. Cyclopea I saw absolutely nothing hostile in your tone. I thought you were being very matter of fact. I believe what some are saying is that female homosexual has more than one meaning.
|
hi Bulldog,
i wanted to take time to comment on your very honest and feeling post because i am the trouble maker in this conversation.
thank you for putting words to your feelings. i appreciate hearing them very sincerely.
i do not find it necessary, satisfying, relevant, desirable or appropriate to "ridicule" or "minimize" anyone...not women, not lesbians, not butches, not femmes, not transpersons, not genderqueers, not anyone. even Hitler gets 1 point on the scoreboard from me (he was a good artist).
i do not think the terms lesbian and woman are antiquated. i do not think they are irrelevant. if i have not made myself clear, i apologize. i see nothing wrong with any word i can think of. i wouldnt presume to find language offensive. i find it limiting at times, and i like watching its expansion, but i do not think it is wrong or right or any of those qualifying words. language just is.
i will make my point with something you said that proves the ways in which people using the same language can hear or understand 2 vastly different things. you said:
p.s. Cyclopea I saw absolutely nothing hostile in your tone. I thought you were being very matter of fact. I believe what some are saying is that female homosexual has more than one meaning.
i thought that Cyclopea was saying exactly the opposite.
thank you again for your honesty.
|
|
|