![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
How Do You Identify?:
~ Preferred Pronoun?:
~ Relationship Status:
~ Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ~
Posts: 424
Thanks: 461
Thanked 467 Times in 176 Posts
Rep Power: 274207 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
i wanted to take time to comment on your very honest and feeling post because i am the trouble maker in this conversation. thank you for putting words to your feelings. i appreciate hearing them very sincerely. i do not find it necessary, satisfying, relevant, desirable or appropriate to "ridicule" or "minimize" anyone...not women, not lesbians, not butches, not femmes, not transpersons, not genderqueers, not anyone. even Hitler gets 1 point on the scoreboard from me (he was a good artist). i do not think the terms lesbian and woman are antiquated. i do not think they are irrelevant. if i have not made myself clear, i apologize. i see nothing wrong with any word i can think of. i wouldnt presume to find language offensive. i find it limiting at times, and i like watching its expansion, but i do not think it is wrong or right or any of those qualifying words. language just is. i will make my point with something you said that proves the ways in which people using the same language can hear or understand 2 vastly different things. you said: p.s. Cyclopea I saw absolutely nothing hostile in your tone. I thought you were being very matter of fact. I believe what some are saying is that female homosexual has more than one meaning. i thought that Cyclopea was saying exactly the opposite. thank you again for your honesty.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|