|
12-01-2009, 05:48 PM | #1 |
The Planet's Technical Bubba
How Do You Identify?:
FTM Preferred Pronoun?:
He/Him/Geek Relationship Status:
Married to my forever! Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 5,440
Thanks: 2,929
Thanked 10,737 Times in 3,173 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
Poly Relationships
So are there any others out there? What do you do to make it work? How do you address distance, if it's an issue?
Share stories of success and not so successfuly poly relationships here.. and perhaps.. find others?
__________________
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Linus For This Useful Post: |
12-08-2009, 09:18 AM | #2 |
Timed Out
How Do You Identify?:
atypical Preferred Pronoun?:
plague words and phrases Relationship Status:
love wise guys of the avian world Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: wekiva springs basin
Posts: 3,236
Thanks: 9,934
Thanked 3,294 Times in 1,301 Posts
Rep Power: 0 |
hi linus.
i found a pretty good article- http://www.newsweek.com/id/209164 "... It's a new paradigm, certainly—and it does break some rules. "Polyamory scares people—it shakes up their world view," says Allena Gabosch, the director of the Seattle-based Center for Sex Positive Culture. But perhaps the practice is more natural than we think: a response to the challenges of monogamous relationships, whose shortcomings—in a culture where divorce has become a commonplace—are clear. Everyone in a relationship wrestles at some point with an eternal question: can one person really satisfy every need? Polyamorists think the answer is obvious—and that it's only a matter of time before the monogamous world sees there's more than one way to live and love. "The people I feel sorry for are the ones who don't ever realize they have any other choices beyond the traditional options society presents," says Scott. "To look at an option like polyamory and say 'That's not for me' is fine. To look at it and not realize you can choose it is just sad..." i have looked at polyamory several times over the years, and wondered if the model could ever work for me. a few of the relationships i've seen and people in them, have successfully worked out [because they all do the work]. certainly, a level of honesty/respect for other partners would make this kind of [or any!] relationship healthier. look forward to reading on- best, belle |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to violaine For This Useful Post: |
12-08-2009, 09:49 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
The Gardner Preferred Pronoun?:
Ummmm Relationship Status:
Nah Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunshine State, State of Sunshine
Posts: 2,616
Thanks: 1,577
Thanked 3,890 Times in 1,155 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853 |
This has always been an interesting concept to me. I myself have reached a point in my life, maybe age, that this would work for me if the right mix came up. It's something I've thought of more in recent years anyway and wonder if it would make life/relationships easier, more enjoyable?
Look forward to hearing any stories. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MrSunshine For This Useful Post: |
12-08-2009, 01:34 PM | #4 | ||
The Planet's Technical Bubba
How Do You Identify?:
FTM Preferred Pronoun?:
He/Him/Geek Relationship Status:
Married to my forever! Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 5,440
Thanks: 2,929
Thanked 10,737 Times in 3,173 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
Quote:
Interesting. I don't know that it's a new paradigm. I think perhaps it's not a common one that most people think of because often it's associated to Mormon et al. concept of marriage. And it breaks down the traditional view of marriage and/or commitment. I had actually been first introduced to this by K and as I investigated it more, I realized that there were a lot of things about this that made sense. When we think of our lives we love a lot of people for a variety of reasons (e.g., siblings, friends, parents, etc). We do not deny our love for them because we decide who should only love one friend or one parent or one sibling, etc. So why do we limit our deeper loves for only one? (work/busy schedule and other stuff aside). Ultimately, I can say that the choice to be involved in a poly relationship or not is up to the person. I won't say that it's for everyone. It's not. But it can be great for many and allows a primary or a group relationship to grow well, strong and provide an avenue for support for all (something that can be challenge in a mono relationship where the partners rely on each for all support). There are some biggies that should be parament in any relationship and it's heightened, IMO, in a poly relationship: 1. Communication. 2. Trust 3. Unconditional love 4. Honesty (both the stuff that is nice and stuff that is harsh) 5. Openness Quote:
I do believe it is about the right mix. For me, I'd love to find a B-F couple that would work with K and me (ideally loves furrkids and kidlets -- bigger the family, the better.). To me, I think it'd be the best option. For both of us, it would ideally address the desire/need for close friend for support (other than lover) as well as another to play with. Would it be easier? I don't know. Depends on how the relationship goes and how well the five points above are met (they are needed in all relationships but definitely come out more in poly relationships). I had thought about trying to do a LD with a femme but... it didn't quite seem to work (although that might be more due to my schedule being wacky at times). K and I have discussed it and we have figured that it'd be best if it wasn't LD and if it was a couple. Anyways.. hopefully others will post. I know of one transguy who has two wives and is very happy with that (although life has thrown a huge loop for him thanks to the economy but that's a separate issue). Oh.. before I forget, The Ethical Slut is a great good and pretty much the poly "Bible". It's a great reference about relationships, even if you don't feel that poly is for you. I'd highly recommend it.
__________________
|
||
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Linus For This Useful Post: |
12-08-2009, 01:46 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
The Gardner Preferred Pronoun?:
Ummmm Relationship Status:
Nah Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sunshine State, State of Sunshine
Posts: 2,616
Thanks: 1,577
Thanked 3,890 Times in 1,155 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853 |
|
12-08-2009, 02:01 PM | #6 | |
The Planet's Technical Bubba
How Do You Identify?:
FTM Preferred Pronoun?:
He/Him/Geek Relationship Status:
Married to my forever! Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 5,440
Thanks: 2,929
Thanked 10,737 Times in 3,173 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
Quote:
It's something I've thought of more in recent years anyway and wonder if it would make life/relationships easier, more enjoyable? Either way... it can but it can also make things more difficult. If the expectation that this will solve everything... eh. I dunno. Can it make things easier? In some ways, I think it can (there is a support system around for everyone -- kinda like the concept of a commune in the past). It should result in greater communication and more openness on relationships. A lot of it will depend on how the relationship dynamic is configured. I do think that it can open up more love opportunities because you can keep your primary relationship while having others that meet the needs that your primary (if you a primary/secondary kind of setup) is unable to or won't meet. It doesn't mean that you love them less but rather that you love them as they are and still have those other needs (whatever they may be) met. Hopefully that makes sense.
__________________
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Linus For This Useful Post: |
12-18-2009, 02:01 AM | #7 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
~ Preferred Pronoun?:
~ Relationship Status:
~ Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ~
Posts: 424
Thanks: 461
Thanked 466 Times in 176 Posts
Rep Power: 274205 |
i think it's our north american eurocentrism that makes us believe poly relationships are "new". the majority do tend to think they've invented everything afterall. (unless they despise it of course)
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hippieflowergirl For This Useful Post: |
12-20-2009, 11:38 PM | #8 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Butch Preferred Pronoun?:
I'm easy Relationship Status:
She's some kind of wonderful. Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: I keep my heart and soul in the boondocks
Posts: 626
Thanks: 240
Thanked 714 Times in 325 Posts
Rep Power: 759421 |
This is something I've been exploring/reading about for the past year or so. I'll tell you one thing, though. Mention it to some people and they just think you're effing nuts.
In the past year, I've learned that yep, you can deeply love more than one person at the same time, and oh yeah, if both those people want monogamy, you're, umm, just screwed. I'm looking forward to reading more because I simply just haven't had that much exposure to people who actually are living life poly.
__________________
"I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, soft, wet kisses that last three days."
-- Crash Davis, Bull Durham |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Write14u For This Useful Post: |
02-01-2010, 06:49 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme Preferred Pronoun?:
a she Relationship Status:
finding my way , Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: arkansas
Posts: 74
Thanks: 2
Thanked 108 Times in 32 Posts
Rep Power: 859273 |
I have to admit i have flirted with poly and it seems to work well for those who can share. As I get older I want to find an equal balance and if that can happen with more then one that be nice and if not so be it.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to casey35 For This Useful Post: |
12-21-2009, 12:56 AM | #10 |
Timed Out
How Do You Identify?:
atypical Preferred Pronoun?:
plague words and phrases Relationship Status:
love wise guys of the avian world Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: wekiva springs basin
Posts: 3,236
Thanks: 9,934
Thanked 3,294 Times in 1,301 Posts
Rep Power: 0 |
hi linus
i am going to respond to the sentences below in separate lines, please. When we think of our lives we love a lot of people for a variety of reasons (e.g., siblings, friends, parents, etc). yes, i do believe that for people with siblings/parents/friends- a variety of love can exist. We do not deny our love for them because we decide who should only love one friend or one parent or one sibling, etc. again, yes- but the type of relationship i would know with a parent/sibling may differ quite a lot dynamics-wise from how i relate to friends, or a person with whom i want to be close to sexually even more so than family or friendships. friendships may turn into relationships or just remain on a platonic level. So why do we limit our deeper loves for only one? (work/busy schedule and other stuff aside). i can only write that i would not consciously set out to place how much love exists for my relationships family/friends/partner. however, i do have a comment about "unconditional love" - in general, and as i read and relate them to your "5" below. i have set boundaries in my relationships- family/friends/partner. not exactly unconditonal if there are lines drawn. thinking about a poly relationship involving clear-cut conversations [defined]and mutual decision-making, et c. how do these go hand in hand with a limitless love [involving more than two people at a time] ? i understand respect, fairness, communication- listening/talking, honesty, and so on. the term "unconditonal love" throws me because it seems [to me] there's an implication of purity/without limits/perfection/unquestionable- love. best, belle There are some biggies that should be parament in any relationship and it's heightened, IMO, in a poly relationship: 1. Communication. 2. Trust 3. Unconditional love 4. Honesty (both the stuff that is nice and stuff that is harsh) 5. Openness I'm actually kind of curious as to why it might make your life/relationships easier and/or more enjoyable? I do believe it is about the right mix. For me, I'd love to find a B-F couple that would work with K and me (ideally loves furrkids and kidlets -- bigger the family, the better.). To me, I think it'd be the best option. For both of us, it would ideally address the desire/need for close friend for support (other than lover) as well as another to play with. Would it be easier? I don't know. Depends on how the relationship goes and how well the five points above are met (they are needed in all relationships but definitely come out more in poly relationships). I had thought about trying to do a LD with a femme but... it didn't quite seem to work (although that might be more due to my schedule being wacky at times). K and I have discussed it and we have figured that it'd be best if it wasn't LD and if it was a couple. Anyways.. hopefully others will post. I know of one transguy who has two wives and is very happy with that (although life has thrown a huge loop for him thanks to the economy but that's a separate issue). Oh.. before I forget, The Ethical Slut is a great good and pretty much the poly "Bible". It's a great reference about relationships, even if you don't feel that poly is for you. I'd highly recommend it. |
The Following User Says Thank You to violaine For This Useful Post: |
12-22-2009, 04:57 PM | #11 |
Timed Out
How Do You Identify?:
Me Preferred Pronoun?:
He Relationship Status:
Unavailable Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Over the Rainbow in a House
Posts: 5,072
Thanks: 16,004
Thanked 5,249 Times in 2,216 Posts
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi Linus,
I think most people are capable to love many people, if they allow themself. It is a matter of being open, free from what society norms are, and enjoying yourself with many. For some, the concept is do-able. However, in reality they can't for whatever reason (boundaries of safety, religious beliefs, kids, and so on). Sometimes one partner can handle it, and then when the reality comes into play, they decide that it is something that they cannot support or participate in. No matter how much talking is done, good and bad, it still kills it. I agree, if you mention this to most people, you get looked at like you have 3 heads. Oy. Have you watched the series "Big Love"? Good show. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Andrew, Jr. For This Useful Post: |
12-23-2009, 10:06 AM | #12 | ||
The Planet's Technical Bubba
How Do You Identify?:
FTM Preferred Pronoun?:
He/Him/Geek Relationship Status:
Married to my forever! Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 5,440
Thanks: 2,929
Thanked 10,737 Times in 3,173 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
Quote:
Quote:
Does this mean everyone should do it? No. I don't believe we're all hardwired for this nor do we all experience the same history to be able to do this. But it is there for those who do feel it can be part of their lives.
__________________
|
||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Linus For This Useful Post: |
04-27-2013, 09:11 AM | #13 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme-bottom, lesbian, queer Preferred Pronoun?:
feminine ones Relationship Status:
Leather polyamorous family Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: with HER
Posts: 1,110
Thanks: 5,494
Thanked 2,855 Times in 905 Posts
Rep Power: 21474849 |
Quote:
I have been part of a poly family for years. Some of the partners have changed along the way but the core of two has always been. :P We have found the best way to begin is with relationship, not just surface hellos and smiles of acquaintances, but real substance, depth and relational intimacy. It is important to be able to feel comfortable sharing. Our goal is to create a bonding spirit between women which is the foundation for trust and the next step sexual intimacy. Though the sexual is side is wondrous it is only a small part of what we are as family, sisters, friends and lovers. We like to feel unified, joined at the hip. There have been times when we rushed the process over what seemed a sexual urgency and failed miserably ending the experience with hurt making us wonder if it is all worth it. In the end it has been more a positive experience in the intimate workings of relationship. It is the hive effect. We have found there is nothing better than a family of women walking through life together. We are so close having one away is like missing something central to self. At present there are four of us. This seems a good number for household workability. We do believe the number could be a bit larger. I find, for me it is the ultimate growing canvas. In knowing and loving these sisters I have grown by leaps. Hugs
__________________
i will wait to love You. i will wait another day For You i'd leave all this behind. i will wait for you tonight. iwill waste another dream on You Always run to You. Uh Huh Her |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ~baby~doll~ For This Useful Post: |
04-30-2013, 10:04 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Alpha Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
Goddess Relationship Status:
Completely in love Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southern Virginia
Posts: 3,225
Thanks: 2,564
Thanked 8,994 Times in 2,249 Posts
Rep Power: 21474854 |
Quote:
I'm curious because at one time I had 3 live-in slaves. People called us poly but I viewed it as me have a stable of slaves. I made the rules, I decided the overall dynamic of everything. They could not freely exchange sexually with each other. They were all property. BDSM Poly is kind of complicated think.
__________________
You either like me or you don't. It took me Twenty-something years to learn how to love myself, I don't have that kinda time to convince somebody else.
~ Daniel Franzese |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sachita For This Useful Post: |
05-05-2013, 03:49 PM | #15 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme-bottom, lesbian, queer Preferred Pronoun?:
feminine ones Relationship Status:
Leather polyamorous family Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: with HER
Posts: 1,110
Thanks: 5,494
Thanked 2,855 Times in 905 Posts
Rep Power: 21474849 |
Quote:
Helen is a true Domme and I always bow to her sexual needs as she always fills mine. We have had a number of different partners added in over the years one couple was with us six years. Now there are four of us and in the lower flat we rent to another couple who are BDSM as well and the Domme is asking Helen question's about joining us. If Helen thinks it's good it will be done.
__________________
i will wait to love You. i will wait another day For You i'd leave all this behind. i will wait for you tonight. iwill waste another dream on You Always run to You. Uh Huh Her |
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ~baby~doll~ For This Useful Post: |
04-30-2013, 10:36 AM | #16 | |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Loren. If you want to know about me, just ask. Preferred Pronoun?:
She/her, but I'm not that picky. Relationship Status:
it's complicated... Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 115
Thanks: 73
Thanked 573 Times in 108 Posts
Rep Power: 4035342 |
Quote:
My primary partner and I started out with an open relationship, neither of us believing one person can (or should) completely fulfill the other. FTR, we've been together over 25 years. The way we make it work is by communicating... a lot. By being honest about our desires, by deciding together what can be fulfilled outside and by respecting each others boundaries. We also have agreements we can both live with. Those agreements have changed over time, but then again, so have we. There are things she wants that I'm piss-poor at, why shouldn't she get that fulfilled in a meaningful way instead of the grudgingly half-assed way I'd probably handle it. And vice-versa, I have needs/wants that she's not into. I lean toward having an other-significant-other who fulfills a good portion (or all) of BDSM needs/desires; While that OSO relationship is based in BDSM (play and sex) it is romantic as well. BTW, I use other-significant-other because I dislike the term 'secondary'. There are also a few play partners in my life. They're friends first, with the occasional foray into SM. Almost all of my play partners have a primary relationship as well. These relationships work because we're friends and look out for one another. To me successful means we're able to and want to be friends even if the romantic/sexual/etc. relationship has ended. That being said, I've been pretty lucky, there's only one where I'd rather not be friends with. On the not so successful side, well, it's like any relationship, sometimes people grow apart, sometimes one person (or both) violates agreements, sometimes things just don't work out.
__________________
Loren "Everything in the world is about sex, except sex. Sex is about power." Oscar Wilde |
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Loren_Q For This Useful Post: |
|
|