![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: So which party (US Specific) do you represent? | |||
| Democrat |
|
85 | 58.22% |
| Republican |
|
2 | 1.37% |
| Tea Party |
|
1 | 0.68% |
| Independent |
|
21 | 14.38% |
| Libetarian |
|
7 | 4.79% |
| Communist |
|
1 | 0.68% |
| International Socialist Worker |
|
0 | 0% |
| Green |
|
4 | 2.74% |
| None |
|
21 | 14.38% |
| Other (please elaborate below) |
|
4 | 2.74% |
| Voters: 146. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 |
|
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Biological female. Lesbian. Relationship Status:
Happy ![]() Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hanging out in the Atlantic.
Posts: 9,234
Thanks: 9,840
Thanked 34,617 Times in 7,640 Posts
Rep Power: 21474860 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There used to be a time when I believed party affiliation meant something. There used to be a time when I felt certain groups were more aligned with my values and beliefs. Then I found that regardless of what was being said, what was done once in office was an entirely different matter.
So, now I evaluate candidates based on plausability i.e. vote for me rhetoric vs what seems possible given the structure we live in and the current prevailing voter preferences. I am always anti-incumbent simply because I believe being in office, even once, makes for strange bedfellows - a practice that needs to be corrected. And, career politicans....are, to me, dangerous people regardless of what they supposedly stand for. I love the Canadian approach to elections. It is swift, cost effective, and over and done with!
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Kobi For This Useful Post: |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|