|  | 
| 
 | |||||||
| View Poll Results: So which party (US Specific) do you represent? | |||
| Democrat |      | 85 | 58.22% | 
| Republican |      | 2 | 1.37% | 
| Tea Party |      | 1 | 0.68% | 
| Independent |      | 21 | 14.38% | 
| Libetarian |      | 7 | 4.79% | 
| Communist |      | 1 | 0.68% | 
| International Socialist Worker |      | 0 | 0% | 
| Green |      | 4 | 2.74% | 
| None |      | 21 | 14.38% | 
| Other (please elaborate below) |      | 4 | 2.74% | 
| Voters: 146. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
|  06-09-2010, 07:21 AM | #3 | 
| Infamous Member How Do You Identify?: Biological female. Lesbian. Relationship Status: Happy  Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Hanging out in the Atlantic. 
					Posts: 9,234
				 Thanks: 9,840 
		
			
				Thanked 34,617 Times in 7,640 Posts
			
		
	Rep Power: 21474860            |   
			
			There used to be a time when I believed party affiliation meant something. There used to be a time when I felt certain groups were more aligned with my values and beliefs. Then I found that regardless of what was being said, what was done once in office was an entirely different matter. So, now I evaluate candidates based on plausability i.e. vote for me rhetoric vs what seems possible given the structure we live in and the current prevailing voter preferences. I am always anti-incumbent simply because I believe being in office, even once, makes for strange bedfellows - a practice that needs to be corrected. And, career politicans....are, to me, dangerous people regardless of what they supposedly stand for. I love the Canadian approach to elections. It is swift, cost effective, and over and done with! 
				__________________ | 
|   |   | 
| The Following User Says Thank You to Kobi For This Useful Post: | 
| 
 | 
 |