Trans News/ Issues

JDeere · 02-26-2017, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DapperButch

So, you posted it, but you didn't share your opinion on the article/situation. What is your opinion?

Sorry I came home kinda tipsy from the bar, when I posted. I think it's an unfair advantage for him to wrestle against girls, but I'm glad to see a trans kid win state titles yet it should have been against his fellow guys.

Only thing that can happen now is that he can change the stigma about trans people and possibly change the law.

Jesse · 03-03-2017, 08:28 PM

A school board outside of Wichita, Kansas, voted this week to ban transgender students from bathrooms that match their gender identity, saying they took license for the new rule from the Trump administration. “Trump was basically leaving it up to us,” Tina Prunier, a member of the Derby Board of Education, told BuzzFeed News in explaining her vote in favor of the rule. “I thought it would be best for the district overall.”

But lawyers for progressive LGBT groups countered that regardless of the federal government’s position, private citizens can still sue the district if a transgender student comes forward with a complaint. “We are standing ready to file lawsuits against school districts like this one that are discriminating against transgender students,” Demoya Gordon, a staff attorney for Lambda Legal, told BuzzFeed News. “There is no staying out of this issue. This is a federal civil-rights issue. This district has exposed itself to a lawsuit.”

To get context for the school board’s vote on Monday, you must rewind to last year. At the time, the district had the same ban on transgender student restroom access it adopted this week — for example, transgender girls couldn’t use the girls restroom.

But in May 2016, the Obama administration announced that all federally funded schools must accommodate transgender students in facilities that match their gender identity. That guidance was based on an interpretation of Title IX, a civil rights law that bans sex discrimination in schools. The Derby Board of Education, in turn, voted to conform to that federal policy — leading some parents to complain.

Cut to 2017: The Trump administration last week withdrew the Obama-era rule, saying that states and local jurisdictions could decide for themselves.
Many states and district decided to keep their trangender-friendly rules in place. But the Derby Board of Education voted 5-2 this week to go back to their original procedure for transgender students. They voted on how they would handle the matter — to ban transgender students from restrooms that match their gender and attempt to offer them other accommodations — even though it was not codified in a written document.

In an interview, Prunier had a hard time explaining her vote to block transgender students from certain restrooms, other than saying that Trump allowed the district to do so, and that it was the district’s best interest.
“To be quite honest, it’s not something I have gone over in my mind,” she replied when asked why she said it was best for her district. “It’s not something I feel strongly one way or another about — their personal rights or how they wish to be.”con't...
https://www.buzzfeed.com/dominichold...epY#.syX1b5KNE

I truly hope that Prunier reads this article she is quoted in, especially the part I bolded, and does some serious thinking/soul searching. I also hope that one of the students does come forth and sue in order to have their rights reestablished. It sucks big time that we are still having to fight tooth and nail to be granted simple human dignities that most others take for granted! I'm so pissed right now!

Jesse · 03-11-2017, 05:31 PM

Supreme Court sends Grimm transgender case back to lower court in light of new federal guidance

The U.S. Supreme Court is sending the case of 17-year-old Gavin Grimm back to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals after President Donald Trump overturned a federal policy on transgender students' access to school restrooms.

The high court announced its decision to vacate the case and remand it back to the lower court on Monday along with several other orders from its Friday conference last week, according to the SCOTUS blog, a law blog written by attorneys who follow the Supreme Court closely.

The U.S. Supreme Court was scheduled to hear oral arguments in the case on March 28.

“Nothing about today’s action changes the meaning of the law. Title IX and the Constitution protect Gavin and other transgender students from discrimination,” said attorney Joshuan Block with the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents Grimm in the case against the Gloucester County School Board.

“While we’re disappointed that the Supreme Court will not be hearing Gavin’s case this term, the overwhelming level of support shown for Gavin and trans students by people across the country throughout this process shows that the American people have already moved in the right direction and that the rights of trans people cannot be ignored,” Block said in a news release from the ACLU. “This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we’ll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.”

On Feb. 22 the Trump Administration withdrew previous federal guidance that said school divisions must allow transgender students to use the bathroom matching their gender identity.

The court requested letters from both sides of the case in light of the Trump administration’s new guidance, which now leaves it up to states and local school divisions to establish policies regarding transgender restroom use.

The ACLU and the Gloucester County School Board asked the court to let the case proceed. The School Board also asked that the case be postponed to allow the federal government to file a brief.

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond relied on the previous guidance from the Obama administration when it voted 2-1 in 2016 in Grimm’s favor to send the case back to federal Judge Robert Doumar with the U.S. Eastern District Court, telling him to reconsider the case.

In fall 2015, Doumar dismissed the claim in the suit that the school division’s restroom-use policy passed in December 2014 that requires students to use the restroom associated with their physical sex or single-stall private unisex restrooms violated Title IX. Doumar did not rule on the 14th Amendment claim in the lawsuit.

In a statement on Monday the Gloucester County School Board said, “the Board looks forward to explaining why its commonsense restroom and locker room policy is legal under the Constitution and federal law.”

Gloucester schools filed a petition last August asking the Supreme Court to determine if it is violating federal law by refusing to allow Grimm access to the boys’ restrooms. In addition to the question about the Title IX interpretation, the petition also questioned the previous guidance issued under the Obama administration.

Grimm, a senior at Gloucester High School, was born female but identifies as male. The lawsuit, filed on his behalf by the ACLU, would have been the first transgender restroom rights case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

http://www.dailypress.com/news/glouc...306-story.html

DapperButch · 03-11-2017, 06:54 PM

You know, Jesse, it is now something every day. Every few days there is a new reversal of state policy or new state discrimination policy. It doesn't even feel like news anymore.

Sad.

I am lucky as hell to live in the Northeast.

I knew they would come after us trans folks, first, and fast. We are the easiest to pick on. Easier than any other minority group.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesse

Supreme Court sends Grimm transgender case back to lower court in light of new federal guidance

The U.S. Supreme Court is sending the case of 17-year-old Gavin Grimm back to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals after President Donald Trump overturned a federal policy on transgender students' access to school restrooms.

The high court announced its decision to vacate the case and remand it back to the lower court on Monday along with several other orders from its Friday conference last week, according to the SCOTUS blog, a law blog written by attorneys who follow the Supreme Court closely.

The U.S. Supreme Court was scheduled to hear oral arguments in the case on March 28.

“Nothing about today’s action changes the meaning of the law. Title IX and the Constitution protect Gavin and other transgender students from discrimination,” said attorney Joshuan Block with the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents Grimm in the case against the Gloucester County School Board.

“While we’re disappointed that the Supreme Court will not be hearing Gavin’s case this term, the overwhelming level of support shown for Gavin and trans students by people across the country throughout this process shows that the American people have already moved in the right direction and that the rights of trans people cannot be ignored,” Block said in a news release from the ACLU. “This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we’ll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.”

On Feb. 22 the Trump Administration withdrew previous federal guidance that said school divisions must allow transgender students to use the bathroom matching their gender identity.

The court requested letters from both sides of the case in light of the Trump administration’s new guidance, which now leaves it up to states and local school divisions to establish policies regarding transgender restroom use.

The ACLU and the Gloucester County School Board asked the court to let the case proceed. The School Board also asked that the case be postponed to allow the federal government to file a brief.

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond relied on the previous guidance from the Obama administration when it voted 2-1 in 2016 in Grimm’s favor to send the case back to federal Judge Robert Doumar with the U.S. Eastern District Court, telling him to reconsider the case.

In fall 2015, Doumar dismissed the claim in the suit that the school division’s restroom-use policy passed in December 2014 that requires students to use the restroom associated with their physical sex or single-stall private unisex restrooms violated Title IX. Doumar did not rule on the 14th Amendment claim in the lawsuit.

In a statement on Monday the Gloucester County School Board said, “the Board looks forward to explaining why its commonsense restroom and locker room policy is legal under the Constitution and federal law.”

Gloucester schools filed a petition last August asking the Supreme Court to determine if it is violating federal law by refusing to allow Grimm access to the boys’ restrooms. In addition to the question about the Title IX interpretation, the petition also questioned the previous guidance issued under the Obama administration.

Grimm, a senior at Gloucester High School, was born female but identifies as male. The lawsuit, filed on his behalf by the ACLU, would have been the first transgender restroom rights case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

http://www.dailypress.com/news/glouc...306-story.html

cricket26 · 03-15-2017, 05:14 PM

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/texas...s-texas-senate

DapperButch · 03-15-2017, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cricket26

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/texas...s-texas-senate

Right they want people to use the bathroom that matches their birth certificate. Their assumption is that our birth certificates always match our genitals.

But, since Texas doesn't allow new birth certificates after gender reassignment surgery, if the "rules" are followed, a trans man with a penis will still have to use the women's room. A trans woman with a vagina will have to use the men's room. So guess what? People's genitals do not always match their birth cert (and of course intersex individuals are completely ignored in this).

cathexis · 03-16-2017, 01:32 AM

Yeah, what are intersex folks to do...just hold it? Maybe protest by "going" in the hallway between the doors!

Archaic South (even though I'm a transplanted Southerner in NY).

03-03-2017, 08:28 PM	#2
Jesse Infamous Member How Do You Identify?: Transguy Preferred Pronoun?: He Relationship Status: single Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Central West Coast of Florida Posts: 5,204 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 34,866 Thanked 17,783 Times in 3,940 Posts Rep Power: 21474857	This Kansas School Board Passed An Anti-Transgender Bathroom Rule Inspired By Trump A school board outside of Wichita, Kansas, voted this week to ban transgender students from bathrooms that match their gender identity, saying they took license for the new rule from the Trump administration. “Trump was basically leaving it up to us,” Tina Prunier, a member of the Derby Board of Education, told BuzzFeed News in explaining her vote in favor of the rule. “I thought it would be best for the district overall.” But lawyers for progressive LGBT groups countered that regardless of the federal government’s position, private citizens can still sue the district if a transgender student comes forward with a complaint. “We are standing ready to file lawsuits against school districts like this one that are discriminating against transgender students,” Demoya Gordon, a staff attorney for Lambda Legal, told BuzzFeed News. “There is no staying out of this issue. This is a federal civil-rights issue. This district has exposed itself to a lawsuit.” To get context for the school board’s vote on Monday, you must rewind to last year. At the time, the district had the same ban on transgender student restroom access it adopted this week — for example, transgender girls couldn’t use the girls restroom. But in May 2016, the Obama administration announced that all federally funded schools must accommodate transgender students in facilities that match their gender identity. That guidance was based on an interpretation of Title IX, a civil rights law that bans sex discrimination in schools. The Derby Board of Education, in turn, voted to conform to that federal policy — leading some parents to complain. Cut to 2017: The Trump administration last week withdrew the Obama-era rule, saying that states and local jurisdictions could decide for themselves. Many states and district decided to keep their trangender-friendly rules in place. But the Derby Board of Education voted 5-2 this week to go back to their original procedure for transgender students. They voted on how they would handle the matter — to ban transgender students from restrooms that match their gender and attempt to offer them other accommodations — even though it was not codified in a written document. In an interview, Prunier had a hard time explaining her vote to block transgender students from certain restrooms, other than saying that Trump allowed the district to do so, and that it was the district’s best interest. “To be quite honest, it’s not something I have gone over in my mind,” she replied when asked why she said it was best for her district. “It’s not something I feel strongly one way or another about — their personal rights or how they wish to be.”con't... https://www.buzzfeed.com/dominichold...epY#.syX1b5KNE I truly hope that Prunier reads this article she is quoted in, especially the part I bolded, and does some serious thinking/soul searching. I also hope that one of the students does come forth and sue in order to have their rights reestablished. It sucks big time that we are still having to fight tooth and nail to be granted simple human dignities that most others take for granted! I'm so pissed right now! __________________ “You’re so hard on yourself. Take a moment. Sit back. Marvel at your life: at the grief that softened you, at the heartache that widened you, at the suffering that strengthened you. Despite everything, you still grow. Be proud of this.”

03-11-2017, 05:31 PM	#3
Jesse Infamous Member How Do You Identify?: Transguy Preferred Pronoun?: He Relationship Status: single Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Central West Coast of Florida Posts: 5,204 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 34,866 Thanked 17,783 Times in 3,940 Posts Rep Power: 21474857	Supreme Court sends Grimm transgender case back to lower court in light of new federal guidance The U.S. Supreme Court is sending the case of 17-year-old Gavin Grimm back to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals after President Donald Trump overturned a federal policy on transgender students' access to school restrooms. The high court announced its decision to vacate the case and remand it back to the lower court on Monday along with several other orders from its Friday conference last week, according to the SCOTUS blog, a law blog written by attorneys who follow the Supreme Court closely. The U.S. Supreme Court was scheduled to hear oral arguments in the case on March 28. “Nothing about today’s action changes the meaning of the law. Title IX and the Constitution protect Gavin and other transgender students from discrimination,” said attorney Joshuan Block with the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents Grimm in the case against the Gloucester County School Board. “While we’re disappointed that the Supreme Court will not be hearing Gavin’s case this term, the overwhelming level of support shown for Gavin and trans students by people across the country throughout this process shows that the American people have already moved in the right direction and that the rights of trans people cannot be ignored,” Block said in a news release from the ACLU. “This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we’ll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.” On Feb. 22 the Trump Administration withdrew previous federal guidance that said school divisions must allow transgender students to use the bathroom matching their gender identity. The court requested letters from both sides of the case in light of the Trump administration’s new guidance, which now leaves it up to states and local school divisions to establish policies regarding transgender restroom use. The ACLU and the Gloucester County School Board asked the court to let the case proceed. The School Board also asked that the case be postponed to allow the federal government to file a brief. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond relied on the previous guidance from the Obama administration when it voted 2-1 in 2016 in Grimm’s favor to send the case back to federal Judge Robert Doumar with the U.S. Eastern District Court, telling him to reconsider the case. In fall 2015, Doumar dismissed the claim in the suit that the school division’s restroom-use policy passed in December 2014 that requires students to use the restroom associated with their physical sex or single-stall private unisex restrooms violated Title IX. Doumar did not rule on the 14th Amendment claim in the lawsuit. In a statement on Monday the Gloucester County School Board said, “the Board looks forward to explaining why its commonsense restroom and locker room policy is legal under the Constitution and federal law.” Gloucester schools filed a petition last August asking the Supreme Court to determine if it is violating federal law by refusing to allow Grimm access to the boys’ restrooms. In addition to the question about the Title IX interpretation, the petition also questioned the previous guidance issued under the Obama administration. Grimm, a senior at Gloucester High School, was born female but identifies as male. The lawsuit, filed on his behalf by the ACLU, would have been the first transgender restroom rights case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court. http://www.dailypress.com/news/glouc...306-story.html __________________ “You’re so hard on yourself. Take a moment. Sit back. Marvel at your life: at the grief that softened you, at the heartache that widened you, at the suffering that strengthened you. Despite everything, you still grow. Be proud of this.”

03-15-2017, 05:14 PM	#5
cricket26 Senior Member How Do You Identify?: femme Preferred Pronoun?: she/her Relationship Status: must be love on the brain Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Texas Posts: 1,598 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 979 Thanked 4,258 Times in 1,311 Posts Rep Power: 21474850	http://www.dallasnews.com/news/texas...s-texas-senate __________________ Life is a long lesson in humility. James M. Barrie

03-16-2017, 01:32 AM	#7
cathexis Senior Member How Do You Identify?: Trotskyist, Anarcho-syndicalist Preferred Pronoun?: They, Them, Their, Sir Bitch Relationship Status: open Join Date: Sep 2016 Location: Great White North! Posts: 4,332 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 16,812 Thanked 4,706 Times in 1,604 Posts Rep Power: 21474849	Yeah, what are intersex folks to do...just hold it? Maybe protest by "going" in the hallway between the doors! Archaic South (even though I'm a transplanted Southerner in NY). __________________ Insurrection is an art, and like all arts has its own laws. -----Leon Trotsky

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode