All things Tech!

[*Anya*]

Link to long article from ars technica with responses from Intel, Microsoft, Apple re: meltdown and spectre.

By Peter Bright January 5, 2018


https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018...oing-about-it/

[*Anya*]

I Downloaded the Information That Facebook Has on Me. Yikes

By BRIAN X. CHEN APRIL 11, 2018

When I downloaded a copy of my Facebook data last week, I didn’t expect to see much. My profile is sparse, I rarely post anything on the site, and I seldom click on ads. (I’m what some call a Facebook “lurker.”)

But when I opened my file, it was like opening Pandora’s box.

With a few clicks, I learned that about 500 advertisers — many that I had never heard of, like Bad Dad, a motorcycle parts store, and Space Jesus, an electronica band — had my contact information, which could include my email address, phone number and full name.

Facebook also had my entire phone book, including the number to ring my apartment buzzer. The social network had even kept a permanent record of the roughly 100 people I had deleted from my friends list over the last 14 years, including my exes.

There was so much that Facebook knew about me — more than I wanted to know. But after looking at the totality of what the Silicon Valley company had obtained about yours truly, I decided to try to better understand how and why my data was collected and stored. I also sought to find out how much of my data could be removed.

How Facebook collects and treats personal information was central this week when Mark Zuckerberg, the company’s chief executive, answered questions in Congress about data privacy and his responsibilities to users. During his testimony, Mr. Zuckerberg repeatedly said Facebook has a tool for downloading your data that “allows people to see and take out all the information they’ve put into Facebook.”

But that’s an overstatement. Most basic information, like my birthday, could not be deleted. More important, the pieces of data that I found objectionable, like the record of people I had unfriended, could not be removed from Facebook, either.

“They don’t delete anything, and that’s a general policy,” said Gabriel Weinberg, the founder of DuckDuckGo, which offers internet privacy tools. He added that data was kept around to eventually help brands serve targeted ads.

Beth Gautier, a Facebook spokeswoman, put it this way: “When you delete something, we remove it so it’s not visible or accessible on Facebook.” She added: “You can also delete your account whenever you want. It may take up to 90 days to delete all backups of data on our servers.”

Digging through your Facebook files is an exercise I highly recommend if you care about how your personal information is stored and used. Here’s what I learned.

Facebook Retains More Data Than We Think
When you download a copy of your Facebook data, you will see a folder containing multiple subfolders and files. The most important one is the “index” file, which is essentially a raw data set of your Facebook account, where you can click through your profile, friends list, timeline and messages, among other features.

One surprising part of my index file was a section called Contact Info. This contained the 764 names and phone numbers of everyone in my iPhone’s address book. Upon closer inspection, it turned out that Facebook had stored my entire phone book because I had uploaded it when setting up Facebook’s messaging app, Messenger.

This was unsettling. I had hoped Messenger would use my contacts list to find others who were also using the app so that I could connect with them easily — and hold on to the relevant contact information only for the people who were on Messenger. Yet Facebook kept the entire list, including the phone numbers for my car mechanic, my apartment door buzzer and a pizzeria.

This felt unnecessary, though Facebook holds on to your phone book partly to keep it synchronized with your contacts list on Messenger and to help find people who newly sign up for the messaging service. I opted to turn off synchronizing and deleted all my phone book entries.

My Facebook data also revealed how little the social network forgets. For instance, in addition to recording the exact date I signed up for Facebook in 2004, there was a record of when I deactivated Facebook in October 2010, only to reactivate it four days later — something I barely remember doing.

Facebook also kept a history of each time I opened Facebook over the last two years, including which device and web browser I used. On some days, it even logged my locations, like when I was at a hospital two years ago or when I visited Tokyo last year.

Facebook keeps a log of this data as a security measure to flag suspicious logins from unknown devices or locations, similar to how banks send a fraud alert when your credit card number is used in a suspicious location. This practice seemed reasonable, so I didn’t try to purge this information.

But what bothered me was the data that I had explicitly deleted but that lingered in plain sight. On my friends list, Facebook had a record of “Removed Friends,” a dossier of the 112 people I had removed along with the date I clicked the “Unfriend” button. Why should Facebook remember the people I’ve cut off from my life?

Facebook’s explanation was dissatisfying. The company said it might use my list of deleted friends so that those people did not appear in my feed with the feature “On This Day,” which resurfaces memories from years past to help people reminisce. I’d rather have the option to delete the list of deleted friends for good.

Your Facebook account keeps a record not only of ads you have clicked on, but also of advertisers that have your contact information, which can also be viewed in your archive.

The Ad Industry Has Eyes Everywhere
What Facebook retained about me isn’t remotely as creepy as the sheer number of advertisers that have my information in their databases. I found this out when I clicked on the Ads section in my Facebook file, which loaded a history of the dozen ads I had clicked on while browsing the social network.

Lower down, there was a section titled “Advertisers with your contact info,” followed by a list of roughly 500 brands, the overwhelming majority of which I had never interacted with. Some brands sounded obscure and sketchy — one was called “Microphone Check,” which turned out to be a radio show. Other brands were more familiar, like Victoria’s Secret Pink, Good Eggs or AARP.

Facebook said unfamiliar advertisers might appear on the list because they might have obtained my contact information from elsewhere, compiled it into a list of people they wanted to target and uploaded that list into Facebook. Brands can upload their customer lists into a tool called Custom Audiences, which helps them find those same people’s Facebook profiles to serve them ads.

Brands can obtain your information in many different ways. Those include:

■ Buying information from a data provider like Acxiom, which has amassed one of the world’s largest commercial databases on consumers. Brands can buy different types of customer data sets from a provider, like contact information for people who belong to a certain demographic, and take that information to Facebook to serve targeted ads, said Michael Priem, chief executive of Modern Impact, an advertising firm in Minneapolis.

■ Using tracking technologies like web cookies and invisible pixels that load in your web browser to collect information about your browsing activities. There are many different trackers on the web, and Facebook offers 10 different trackers to help brands harvest your information, according to Ghostery, which offers privacy tools that block ads and trackers. The advertisers can take some pieces of data that they have collected with trackers and upload them into the Custom Audiences tool to serve ads to you on Facebook.

■ Getting your information in simpler ways, too. Someone you shared information with could share it with another entity. Your credit card loyalty program, for example, could share your information with a hotel chain, and that hotel chain could serve you ads on Facebook.

The upshot? Even a Facebook lurker, like myself, who has barely clicked on any digital ads can have personal information exposed to an enormous number of advertisers. This was not entirely surprising, but seeing the list of unfamiliar brands with my contact information in my Facebook file was a dose of reality.

I tried to contact some of these advertisers, like Very Important Puppets, a toymaker, to ask them about what they did with my data. They did not respond.

What About Google?
Let’s be clear: Facebook is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to what information tech companies have collected on me.

Knowing this, I also downloaded copies of my Google data with a tool called Google Takeout. The data sets were exponentially larger than my Facebook data. For my personal email account alone, Google’s archive of my data measured eight gigabytes, enough to hold about 2,000 hours of music. By comparison, my Facebook data was about 650 megabytes, the equivalent of about 160 hours of music.

Here was the biggest surprise in what Google collected on me: In a folder labeled Ads, Google kept a history of many news articles I had read, like a Newsweek story about Apple employees walking into glass walls and a New York Times story about the editor of our Modern Love column. I didn’t click on ads for either of these stories, but the search giant logged them because the sites had loaded ads served by Google.

In another folder, labeled Android, Google had a record of apps I had opened on an Android phone since 2015, along with the date and time. This felt like an extraordinary level of detail

Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

On a brighter note, I downloaded an archive of my LinkedIn data. The data set was less than half a megabyte and contained exactly what I had expected: spreadsheets of my LinkedIn contacts and information I had added to my profile.

Yet that offered little solace. Be warned:

Once you see the vast amount of data that has been collected about you, you won’t be able to unsee it.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/11/t...-me-yikes.html

[Esme nha Maire]

I hope this isn't entirely outside the remit of this thread. With regard to the above, about the huge amounts of data gathered about each and every one of us by companies, whether or not we have actually used their services or not, what bothers me is that it seems to me to be a very unsubtle assault on the individual in a subtle sort of way.

To clarify that last - who am I? Well, I am me, sat at this keyboard tying this - but to you, reading this, I am the impression that you form of me from reading these words that I type. If we engage in interpersonal communication, what will regulate that interaction is the impression you have formed of me - which may not be accurate, or fair, or you may pick up on some minor point or trait and imagine from that that I am either lovable/hatable, employable/unemployable etc.

We all, to greater or lesser degree, show different aspects of ourselves in different situations, contexts. But these huge data-gathering mechanisms don't care about context. They care about fact - you visited these sites, made those purchases, watched that film, bought that toy, liked this celebrity, commented in that thread, and so on. And from all this, a model of you is created. But at no point is anyone checking to see if it is a real model of you, an accurate one. It is one made on a set of assumptions, and those assumptions are driven purely by corporate entities desire to make more money from you, to get you to buy their products, by targeted advertising.

They do not care about context, about mistakes - every really liked someone only to find years later that they went to jail for doing something abhhorent? Ever bought something as a joke for a friend? Ever made a social mistake you later regretted, or said something in ignorance because you simply didn't know enough at the time? Pre-internet, that information either wasn't known, or was known to very few aside from yourself. Now - once it;s out there, it;s simply not forgotten. Your rationale for whatever it was isnt known, it's assumed, and you may be judged based on those potentially. incorrect assumptions.

And companies do abuse this data, as do outright criminals. The extent to which businesses are data-driven should not be underestimated. What if your
ability to land a job is affected by a trawl of available data on you done by a company, a job you may be a perfect fit for, except that, oh, I dunno, maybe you looked something up on the net out of sheer curiosity, or to try to help a friend, regarding drugs, so clearly you have an interest in drugs, and that's an immediate no-hire for the company offering the job?

The utility you may find in social media sites does not come free of charge. It comes at the expense of your privacy and the extent to which you are happy to let others make decisions about your life based on assumptions made on the gigabytes of minutiae gleaned from your use of the internet, whether you're sitting at a computer typing, as I am now, or buying something in a shop with a card, or whether you just happen to be visible in a picture someone puts of an event onto a social media site, and somebody recognising you add the information about who you are.

It boils down to who are we - the warm body making their way through life trying to do the best they can, or the assumptions made by others who've never met us based on gigabytes of minutiae about our lives. The one is not the other - and yet increasingly, it seems to be the horde of data that is treated as being the real person. And there is seldom, if ever, any effective appeal against mistakes made on that basis.

The "I don't mind because I've got nothing to hide" line some come out with is so naieve it's painful. It isn't a question of skeletons in teh closets - it's whether trivia about you is more real than you are - and to companies - and criminals - and, unfortunately, all too many folk who don't see the human behind our postings online, it IS more real than you. It is all they know about you, after all, and as you're not a warm body to them, why should they care any hurt they cause you as a result?