|
View Poll Results: Is Nuclear Energy Worth the Risk? | |||
Yes ~ I'll explain | 8 | 17.39% | |
No ~ I'll Explain | 26 | 56.52% | |
Not sure ~ Enlighten me | 10 | 21.74% | |
I'm skeered of anything Radioactive ~ but I might join in anyway | 2 | 4.35% | |
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-04-2011, 07:31 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Hippy Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: *
Posts: 3,750
Thanks: 6,499
Thanked 11,917 Times in 2,700 Posts
Rep Power: 21474854 |
Is Nuclear Energy Worth the Risk?
Is Nuclear Energy Worth the Risk? Here's a discussion article on this very Topic. http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/04/0...ate/index.html Quote:
This Topic is now open for discussion.
There's a Poll ~ gimme a second to get that going.
__________________
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Daywalker For This Useful Post: |
04-04-2011, 07:39 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Hippy Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: *
Posts: 3,750
Thanks: 6,499
Thanked 11,917 Times in 2,700 Posts
Rep Power: 21474854 |
Here's an alarming piece of recent information:
And another one, Japan stating that their dumping in 'Unavoidable': http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapc...ex.html?hpt=T2
__________________
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daywalker For This Useful Post: |
04-04-2011, 08:09 PM | #3 |
Junior Member
How Do You Identify?:
I do not, thanks Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
Taken Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 51
Thanks: 229
Thanked 152 Times in 37 Posts
Rep Power: 1472367 |
Yes, if we'll be wanting electricity in the relatively near future that doesn't further speed up climate change.
Sadly, everything seems to involve a Faustian bargain these days... |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Kat For This Useful Post: |
04-04-2011, 08:22 PM | #4 |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Biological female. Lesbian. Relationship Status:
Happy Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hanging out in the Atlantic.
Posts: 9,234
Thanks: 9,840
Thanked 34,661 Times in 7,652 Posts
Rep Power: 21474860 |
To me, there was a time when nuclear energy was a viable alternative. But, as the technology has developed, it is easy to see the benefits of various forms of renewable energy. It just makes sense. It is just safer.
__________________
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kobi For This Useful Post: |
04-04-2011, 08:32 PM | #5 |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Human Preferred Pronoun?:
He Relationship Status:
Very Married Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Where I want to be
Posts: 8,155
Thanks: 47,491
Thanked 29,299 Times in 6,640 Posts
Rep Power: 21474859 |
http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_new...nuclear-planet
Maddow had this up on her blog today. By the looks of it we are already screwing up our DNA as well as every single living thing on the planet.
__________________
"Many proposals have been made to us to adopt your laws, your religion, your manners and your customs. We would be better pleased with beholding the good effects of these doctrines in your own practices, than with hearing you talk about them".
~Old Tassel, Chief of the Tsalagi (Cherokee) Last edited by Corkey; 04-04-2011 at 08:42 PM. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Corkey For This Useful Post: |
04-04-2011, 08:38 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
Lady Relationship Status:
single Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,823
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 3,879 Times in 1,485 Posts
Rep Power: 21474853 |
Why can't everything just be solar or wind powered? We used to much of everything else.
__________________
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to StillettoDoll For This Useful Post: |
04-04-2011, 09:02 PM | #7 |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Woman Preferred Pronoun?:
HER - SHE Relationship Status:
Relating Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CA & AZ I'm a Snowbird
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 11,826
Thanked 10,830 Times in 3,200 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
Until there are viable and safe ways to store nuclear waste from these plants, I don't think more should be built. I also think that a hell of a lot more effort needs to go into research and development of other kinds of energy production.
One of the major problems I see with nuclear energy is the energy companies that run them. They are profit driven and will cut corners if they can get away with it. Also, after living near the Rancho Seco plant near Sacramento (closed for safety reasons upon the vote of the people living in that utility district) for many years and working with other clinicians that were part of insurance panels for the utility that ran it and learning of the amount of drug use of technicians working all those late and graveyard shifts there- I am not comfortable with the human resource development and training involved in these companies. This situation was found to be related to accidents occurring at that plant (all documented during the fight to close that plant). I'm not crazy for nuclear power, yet my problems with it are not about the science behind it really. This is part of the "human error" that can lead to accidents which is not related to the science and engineering of nuclear power. In fact, how many times do we hear something about the recommendations of the engineers and scientists being totally disregarded after plants are built? And it is usually about money. After hearing about the very same kinds of shut-off valves that malfunctioned in the Gulf oil spill and the fact that new drilling being OK'ed with the same damn valve- I'm not trusting governmental regulations much these days (an certainly not what is going on with re-licensing aging nuclear plants). These factors are also involved in regulating nuclear power plants. The science is amazing, but, we are not going to have top-notch nuclear scientists running these plants. A lot of the jobs they create are not going to pay the big bucks to have the kind of people needed there 24/7. Many of these jobs are not technical in nature at all and semi-skilled. So, I am wondering about the human resource areas to this within companies that run these plants, including public utilities (that sometimes are farmed-out to the private sector). I would like to see more done with our (USA) doing more in cutting down energy use all together. We waste so much! Hell, look at the mess we are in with plain old “garbage,” hazardous waste and e-waste! If we can’t deal with that effectively, how are we going to deal with nuclear waste? When I see lights on in empty room, it drives me nuts! Of course, I can still my Momma yelling "turn out the damn light" when leaving a room! Also, I really like living where there is decent public transit. I have made some fairly simple and inexpensive changes to my own home and seen quite a reduction in my utility bills-think of what we can accomplish if we had the money to install solar panels for hot water and buy only energy star efficient appliances. makes me nuts that these things are so expensive as my bet is that most people would do more to save energy if they could afford these things. |
04-04-2011, 09:04 PM | #8 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Human Preferred Pronoun?:
He/Him Relationship Status:
Happily Single! Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Nunya
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,355
Thanked 2,574 Times in 790 Posts
Rep Power: 18276166 |
I think nuclear energy is a viable option. The knee jerk based on what is happening in Japan is normal when something catastrophic like this happens. Was the problem the power plant? No. Was the problem the earthquake? No. The problem was the tsunami. Locate nuclear power plants where they are not near the water, not on a fault line, or in a tornado alley. Modern day nuclear power plants rely on gravity feed water cooling systems. What that means is that if they have a power failure, water flows from above to allow time to get backup power systems working, so that pumps used to circulate the water can be placed back online. In the case of Japan, they had back up power sources, but they went under water so it was the one, two punch of earthquake followed by tsuname that led to what is happening now. We are very dependent on fossil fuels; that isn't likely to change in the short term. However, we do need to look at all alternative sources including nuclear. Just my .02.
Glynn |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Oiler41 For This Useful Post: |
04-04-2011, 09:13 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Hippy Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: *
Posts: 3,750
Thanks: 6,499
Thanked 11,917 Times in 2,700 Posts
Rep Power: 21474854 |
If Solar were monetarily feasible, I would hope that soon it will be for
most households ~ it would be a no-brainer for me. Solar is a funny choice for someone who is as light and sun sensitive as myself...lol, but I give credit where credit is due. The Sun has its benefits! Currently I have a fee added on to my Power bill in order to have a percentage of the energy that MY household uses come from solar and wind. As for the many tons of Radioactive water that is currently being dumped into the Pacific Ocean that is supposed to be 'nothing to worry about', well...it kind of reminds me of something. When original facts are proven to be wrong about Prescription medication, it ends up on every late night Lawyer commercial out there. See, but when the facts come up wrong about Radioactive Waste, we will not see it on late night TV. The impact ends up exposing itself when sea creature offspring is grossly manipulated; or of course, when we become aware of the sudden end of other species. Fluctuation in the cost of Solar/Wind? Bet it would be nothing compared to the price game of Oil.
__________________
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daywalker For This Useful Post: |
04-04-2011, 09:32 PM | #10 | |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Woman Preferred Pronoun?:
HER - SHE Relationship Status:
Relating Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CA & AZ I'm a Snowbird
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 11,826
Thanked 10,830 Times in 3,200 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
Quote:
We could do so much to improve the cost factor if all new construction had to have whatever solar (or other more cost effective method for the consumer) type set-up or heat-pumps configurations, etc. was required. This would have to make sense in total cost, but installing these kinds of thing to begin with is much less expensive. Are there any rebates/tax breaks from utility companies for solar power where you live? These can help- but you bring up a big problem for people- the damn cost in retro-fitting. I have been looking into some DIY hot water heater solar systems that are cost effective and actually not complicated (sun and gravity!). But, this old butch doesn't trust herself going up on the roof anymore. Most likely, the US will need many sources of power/energy. I just hope we start getting a whole lot smarter about it! |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AtLast For This Useful Post: |
04-04-2011, 09:44 PM | #11 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Momma, Ma'am Preferred Pronoun?:
She/Her Relationship Status:
I am in love. Truly Madly Deeply Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: California
Posts: 997
Thanks: 502
Thanked 2,128 Times in 560 Posts
Rep Power: 2369287 |
It is a dangerous way to boil water. Just sayin.
__________________
"I have a respect for manners as such, they are a way of dealing with people you don't agree with or like." Margaret Mead Read me! www.leatherati.com |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Isadora For This Useful Post: |
04-04-2011, 09:48 PM | #12 | |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Woman Preferred Pronoun?:
HER - SHE Relationship Status:
Relating Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CA & AZ I'm a Snowbird
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 11,826
Thanked 10,830 Times in 3,200 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
Quote:
Japan as a technological leader and its power needs are difficult due to its size and being a country of islands. So, it chose nuclear as its prime power source. It doesn't have a lot of land mass for something like wind or huge solar panel "fields." It is a country with a lot of people and construction is very vertical. It will be hit many more times by tsunamis in the future and the plants that are in trouble were built in 1979. A lot has been developed since then in terms of plant engineering. They really have a problem in terms of viable energy sources. The US has many more options. |
|
04-04-2011, 10:15 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Northwest Wind and Lake Michigan Preferred Pronoun?:
Paesano Relationship Status:
Solo Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore
Posts: 1,546
Thanks: 3,597
Thanked 3,732 Times in 1,096 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
The truth is, if we switched to a more viable option now, our enemies would crush us in a day.
|
04-04-2011, 10:20 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Hippy Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: *
Posts: 3,750
Thanks: 6,499
Thanked 11,917 Times in 2,700 Posts
Rep Power: 21474854 |
Quote:
In what way do you mean?
__________________
|
|
04-05-2011, 12:51 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
A mixity Preferred Pronoun?:
whatever Relationship Status:
chillin Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: in a really really cute little place
Posts: 2,144
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 4,531 Times in 1,222 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
NO
~ It's way, way too expensive to build a plant
~ There is no safe long-term storage for the waste, nobody wants it, it lasts too long, etc. ~ We cannot plan for and control all the things that can go wrong ~ No matter how safe the actual process is, the plant is run by humans, who regularly mistakes AND ~ It can get OUT-OF-CONTROL when we fuck up and the price is way too high. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Turtle For This Useful Post: |
04-05-2011, 08:15 AM | #16 |
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Queer, trans guy, butch Preferred Pronoun?:
Male pronouns Relationship Status:
Relationship Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 4,090
Thanked 3,907 Times in 1,032 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 |
I think there tends to be a lot of alarmism when it comes to nuclear power. Yeah there have been a handful if even of major accidents that have not ended well, but given that plants have evolved since most of those took place I don't think there is a need to be overly worried. Japan really was a case of an event that was unprecedented in Japanese history as far as the scale of both the tsunami and the earthquake. Yet I was just hearing on the news the other day that it had been revealed that the leak had not been as dangerous/severe as previously thought. Of course we won't know the real effect for a while, but I do think we have the tendency to blow disasters out of proportion at first.
Anyways, given how many nuclear power plants are providing vast areas with electricity the world over today, and given the number of accidents there have been today, I would not be worried. Ontario has something like 15 or 20 nuclear power plants and, according to the official OPG website, have not had a single mishap in the 40 years that they have been operating these plants. It's not Ontario's sole source of electricity, but apparently nuclear energy can account for up to 50% of Ontario's electricty needs, which I found interesting. Of course Ontario is rather strategically placed so we get a lot of power from hydroelectricity (thank you Niagra Falls lol) as well. I've no doubt that if governments and related researchers became completely dedicated to making alternative energy a true reality, that it would be possible. Lol, I remember some German students that were shown on the news once who made a functioning car entirely out of biodegradable material and ran it on green energy. Come on, if graduate students can do it, evidently with more money behind it this wouldn't be entirely farfetched. |
04-05-2011, 09:06 AM | #17 | |
MILLION $$$ PUSSY
How Do You Identify?:
Kinky, Raw, Perverted, Uber Queer Alpha Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
Iconic Ms. Relationship Status:
Keeper of 3, only one has the map to my freckles Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ** La Reina del Sur**
Posts: 22,488
Thanks: 32,231
Thanked 80,119 Times in 15,678 Posts
Rep Power: 21474873 |
Weeee!
Quote:
+6987543 cause this post was priceless
__________________
"If you’re going to play these dirty games of ours, then you might as well indulge completely. It’s all about turning back into an animal and that’s the beauty of it. Place your guilt on the sidewalk and take a blow torch to it (guilt is usually worthless anyway). Be perverted, be filthy, do things that mannered people shouldn’t do. If you’re going to be gross then go for it and don’t wimp out."---Master Aiden |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The_Lady_Snow For This Useful Post: |
04-05-2011, 11:40 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Hippy Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: *
Posts: 3,750
Thanks: 6,499
Thanked 11,917 Times in 2,700 Posts
Rep Power: 21474854 |
I think a Nuclear Facility had no business being built upon the Ring of Fire.
Radiation is floating in US waters as we type. Jack put in a link to a blog earlier in this thread. Thank you Jack, it made for some really interesting reading last night. I refuse to be one of those people that believes everything Authorities spew about the dangers that surround us. I am not a paranoid person, but was taught to 'question everything'. If radiation gets into mah soil here, I'll be one pissed off Hippy. I prefer to grow mah Harvest outdoors, doncha know. Solar and Wind might not line the oil fuck-wads' pockets with green, but it sure as hell will ensure that our hillsides remain green.
__________________
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daywalker For This Useful Post: |
04-05-2011, 12:41 PM | #19 | ||
Pink Confection
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
She, Her, Ma'am Relationship Status:
Dating Myself Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,266
Thanks: 17,195
Thanked 11,383 Times in 2,840 Posts
Rep Power: 21474855 |
Quote:
Indeed! Quote:
__________________
|
||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Apocalipstic For This Useful Post: |
04-05-2011, 08:08 PM | #20 | |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
Woman Preferred Pronoun?:
HER - SHE Relationship Status:
Relating Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CA & AZ I'm a Snowbird
Posts: 5,408
Thanks: 11,826
Thanked 10,830 Times in 3,200 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 |
Quote:
Reports of radiation levels have been all over the place- even from organizations that have a lot of expertise. There isn't much room for error with nuclear power- consequently I don't put much weight in the accident records. It is just not like other kinds of mishaps. We have no control over events like earthquakes or tsunamis and at what magnitude they can hit. And we do not have the spent fuel storage/disposal figured out. Frankly, I don't think a thing has been blown out of proportion- higher levels of particular kinds of radiation have entered the Japanese food chain and water. Yes, ask questions and do research. I don't doubt the great minds that bring these kinds of advances to us at all- I do not trust government regulatory agencies and plant management to do what the scientists and engineers tell them in order to run these plants in a safe manner- they will not do so because of costs. Look at what was going on in the Gulf with regulation agencies! And not only does this suck due to the spill, but that is an area that has a large work force in the oil drilling industry along with fishing. Nuclear plants also provide many jobs. Right now, due to cost, huge energy companies in the US won't touch nuclear power. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to AtLast For This Useful Post: |
|
|