![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Do Business Owners Have the Right to Refuse Service Due to Moral/Religious Objections? | |||
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 25.00% |
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
38 | 63.33% |
Unsure/Maybe/Other |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 11.67% |
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#25 | |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Satan in a Sunday Hat Preferred Pronoun?:
Maow Relationship Status:
Married Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Chemical Valley
Posts: 4,086
Thanks: 3,312
Thanked 8,738 Times in 2,565 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() Secondly - Slippery slope argument. Thirdly - I want to know, then, since you think it's okay to refuse services to people just for being gay - do you think that there should be no protected classes of people at all? Do you think that business owners should get to turn people away for being Asian? Hindu? I know Rand Paul thinks that business owners should get to do that, so it's not a totally far-fetched fringe notion. And if you don't think that business owners should be able to turn people away because of their race or their religion - why do you think it's okay to turn people away because of their sexual orientation?
__________________
bête noire \bet-NWAHR\, noun: One that is particularly disliked or that is to be avoided.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to betenoire For This Useful Post: |
|
|