It's Time to Boycott Arizona

[FR]

-just a thanks for a good thread-serious topic
--some other companies to boycott i hear are: fox animation studios,TGI fridays,Ramada,taco time and club jenna-guess i'll have to get my porn somewhere else....

[Diva]

When the Phoenix Suns played the San Antonio Spurs last night, they had a slight change in their uniforms......

They changed it to "Los Suns" to protest the new law. I LOVE it!

[Jess]

So, more folks we have seen as the "good guys" may not be so "good" after all.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/miran...-in-agreement/

It is truly frightening that creating and/or even proposing legislature that it so blatantly unconstitutional is almost becoming a trend.

If Rachel Maddow can agree with Glenn Beck ( on anything, lol) these times, they are a changing.

It's so very hard to trust a "person" who does such good work and then turns around and undoes his credibility with something as heinous as this recent proposal.

Lieberman on DADT :

http://www.mediaite.com/online/miran...-in-agreement/

Lieberman on stripping citizenship:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plu...n-strippi.html

I hope this is not seen as a derail. I think it terribly important for us to begin looking at our politicians through very clear glasses. I fear the federal governments lack of action regarding the AZ case is simply fueling the fires for any "anti-American" legislature.

Praying Lieberman's proposal isn't another thing that just slips by because it is inconvenient timing for elections and party posturing.

[Apocalipstic]

Originally Posted by dreadgeek

Honestly I think it's a lot of folks who take living in America for granted. They don't realize just how amazingly good they have it here. One irony of this, for me, is that when war next breaks out on the Korean peninsula and we are fighting there (we have a treaty obligation to be there, we *can't* leave) they will paint North Korea as a nation no one should want to emulate (which it isn't). If confronted by their statement expressing admiration for the border security that North Korea has, they will then deny that they would EVER say such a thing!

What's more, the person who wrote this and every single person who sends this meme forward like it was a good thing is not even wrong about the Afghanistan border. They demonstrate their near complete ignorance of the Afghan border--when you have a moment, take a look at a good topological map of the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. The most powerful, technologically advanced, and nightmarishly lethal war machine ever devised by the mind of man can't secure it. Think about that for just a moment. Our Air Force can pick any section of the sky, anywhere on this planet and say "we want complete and total control of that area in a week" and within a week we will have *absolute* air superiority over it. There is no body of water larger than a lake that the Navy cannot control pretty much at will. We have satellites that are *extremely* sensitive and yet, the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan is owned by no one--not the Pakistani army, not the American army, not the tribes living in the area. It's a free-for-all there.

I bring that up not to puff out my chest at the power of the American military but to illustrate a point: yes, if you cross the border into Afghanistan you very well might be shot. There are any of a number of ways to die crossing that border but it doesn't matter if you tried to ninja your way across that border or drove across in a convoy, your risks are about the same because it is lawless at that border. There's a real honest-to-goodness shooting war going on that and anyone who crosses into a war zone is taking their lives in their hands! The fact that people would use, on the one hand, the last Stalinist dictatorship on the planet (and Kim Jong-Il is a Stalinist more than a Maoist) and on the other an active war zone as examples of perfect border security shows that they haven't thought very much about what it is like to actually LIVE in those nations nor what it means to be a citizen of a liberal democracy like America.

At the risk of a Godwin's law violation, Hitler made the trains run on time. Could we have perfect border security? Almost certainly yes. We would also no longer resemble America and would more closely resemble either pre-1991 Russia or pre-Unification East Germany. Could we have near perfect internal security? Almost certainly. At that point we would BE pre-Unification East Germany or pre-1991 Russia.

Those folks who think that North Korea has such great border security forget that not praising the Dear Leader on queue or with insufficient enthusiasm or slightly out of time with everyone else will *also* land one in prison. They seem to want to trade their freedom (which they take utterly for granted) for security (even though the actual threat to them, personally, is relatively small) and, as such, they deserve neither.

Something I would like to see us American liberals do is revive a sense of what it means to BE an American. What our ideals are, why we hold them, and what the alternatives are. Yes, our history is spotty in a lot of areas and downright tragically horrific in others. And yes, all of the men who laid down the foundation of modern Western liberal democracy were white, many of them were slaveholders, most of them were sexists, and quite a number of them were xenophobic racists and cultural imperialists at that. I admit all of that. And yet, and yet...if you read the ideas, many of them are very good, sound ideas. I think that some of us who call ourselves liberal (as I do) or progressive (as others might) have thrown out the baby with the bathwater. In our rush to point out their failings, we have decided that the *ideas* expressed aren't worth teaching and therefore, aren't worth carrying forward. Where we stand now, where on the one hand, people post things admiring the North Koreans for their brutal and Orwellian police state while on the other hand shouting USA! USA! and calling it patriotism, is in part a reflection of the fact that we do not know what it means to be a citizen of a liberal democracy.

I am trying to re-learn what it means because I am a grandparent now. It will be my job, as matriarch of my family, to pass on what it means to be a decent citizen to my grandchildren. One thing I know I will pass on is that being an American citizen is far more deep, far more worthwhile, and altogether more demanding than chanting USA! USA! and asserting, against quite a large amount of empirical evidence, that America is the greatest and best at everything.

Yes, I think it is so important for us to think about what it means to be a citizen of the United States of America. Why this country was formed and how hypocritical it is that we want to keep other people out.

I do not want us to ever be like North Korea, the USSR, the DDR or Nazi Germany.

I want us to work together to be the land of the FREE. But our rights seem to be eroding before our eyes.

I would rather be at more risk than have the Patriot Act and have everyone "brown" have to carry around papers. At that point, I agree, we have become we say we are trying to avoid.

[Apocalipstic]

Originally Posted by Jess

So, more folks we have seen as the "good guys" may not be so "good" after all.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/miran...-in-agreement/

It is truly frightening that creating and/or even proposing legislature that it so blatantly unconstitutional is almost becoming a trend.

If Rachel Maddow can agree with Glenn Beck ( on anything, lol) these times, they are a changing.

It's so very hard to trust a "person" who does such good work and then turns around and undoes his credibility with something as heinous as this recent proposal.

Lieberman on DADT :

http://www.mediaite.com/online/miran...-in-agreement/

Lieberman on stripping citizenship:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plu...n-strippi.html

I hope this is not seen as a derail. I think it terribly important for us to begin looking at our politicians through very clear glasses. I fear the federal governments lack of action regarding the AZ case is simply fueling the fires for any "anti-American" legislature.

Praying Lieberman's proposal isn't another thing that just slips by because it is inconvenient timing for elections and party posturing.

Everyone needs to be read their Miranda Rights.

PERIOD.

And stripping people we think MIGHT be terrorists? The line between terrorist and patriot is a fine one.

[MsDemeanor]

Originally Posted by apocalipstic

Everyone needs to be read their Miranda Rights.

PERIOD.

And stripping people we think MIGHT be terrorists? The line between terrorist and patriot is a fine one.

There's also the hypocrisy of good old Chuck Grassley, who does not want terrorists mirandized and also believes that it violates the 2nd Amendment if folks on the FBI watch list are banned from buying weapons. Gotta protect the 2nd, but fuck the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th.

Maybe we need a new thread.

Oh, FYI, the Los Suns uniforms are not new; the team has worn them before. They were worn for the occasion yesterday, but they were not created for the occasion yesterday. I noticed that about 98% of the mentions that I've seen didn't bother pointing this out.

[The_Lady_Snow]

Originally Posted by MsDemeanor

There's also the hypocrisy of good old Chuck Grassley, who does not want terrorists mirandized and also believes that it violates the 2nd Amendment if folks on the FBI watch list are banned from buying weapons. Gotta protect the 2nd, but fuck the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th.

Maybe we need a new thread.

Oh, FYI, the Los Suns uniforms are not new; the team has worn them before. They were worn for the occasion yesterday, but they were not created for the occasion yesterday. I noticed that about 98% of the mentions that I've seen didn't bother pointing this out.

I thought someone posted the article where it mentioned that the uniforms were used on Latino Day.

[MsDemeanor]

Originally Posted by The_Lady_Snow

I thought someone posted the article where it mentioned that the uniforms were used on Latino Day.

You're right, someone did. I had noticed that most articles and news reports were implying that the jerseys were a new idea, and wanted to clear that up

[Apocalipstic]

Originally Posted by MsDemeanor

There's also the hypocrisy of good old Chuck Grassley, who does not want terrorists mirandized and also believes that it violates the 2nd Amendment if folks on the FBI watch list are banned from buying weapons. Gotta protect the 2nd, but fuck the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th.

Maybe we need a new thread.

he really is not being very consistent is he?

if you are on the FBI list you should not be read your rights, but you should be able to get a gun. makes no sense.

UGH