Would you?

[imperfect_cupcake]

Well, I think if anyone has lost anyone due to a bomb going off from a terrorist attack or from their country being blasted to shit and occupied, I don't think people would be quite so flippant about a bit of sex.

[TruTexan]

My answer? UHM HELL NO. I don't play share the partner well.at.all.
I'll leave this one to IC to solve world peace with sex. LOL ( and I'm just kidding).

[bobbi46]

hmmmm tuff question .....

part of me says Yes ..For world peace .
But my real answer is No...i dont control her or i cant tell her what to do nor do i want to .but i did marry her..and thats for life ..so in my little mind she is mine and mine alone )

[imperfect_cupcake]

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

[job]

Absolutely. Even without the loved one's death, part added to it. World peace is kind of a big deal.

[TruTexan]

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

[~ocean]

sex for world peace ~ if hy wanted too i'd say go for it ~ after all it's only sex ~

[DapperButch]

Originally Posted by TruTexan

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written to all:

Really? It is world peace people!

Like, are people seriously saying that they would not be ok with their partner having sex with someone ONE TIME for WORLD PEACE?

I would even have sex with a cis male for world peace. I may vomit along the way and have bad memories to work through later, but I would do it!

PLUS, the world would be so grateful, and women would see me as hot for "sacrificing for the world", I could make up for anything nasty I had to do!

[imperfect_cupcake]

Originally Posted by TruTexan

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

So, what you are saying is, you'd prefer to let someone you love die (mum, dad, sibbling or best friend).

Ok. What if it's your partner? What if she will die? Would you prefer to let her die or to let someone else have sex with her for 15 minutes?

[JDeere]

World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.

[TruTexan]

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

So, what you are saying is, you'd prefer to let someone you love die (mum, dad, sibbling or best friend).

Ok. What if it's your partner? What if she will die? Would you prefer to let her die or to let someone else have sex with her for 15 minutes?

It's not up to me, to LET anyone do anything. I said I don't share well with others, there's a lot of pain for me involving that very issue and I can't get past it. I'm sorry, my answer is still NO.

[DapperButch]

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

[Smiling]

Originally Posted by DapperButch

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

It's a dirty job, but somebody's gotta do it. Since I don't have a partner, I'd personally take one for the team.

And if I did have a partner, would I "let" them sleep with someone else? I don't think it's my decision to make for anyone else. Partner or no - it isn't about "ownership." You do what you've gotta do and then I'll do likewise. Either we can get past it or we can't; but world peace!

It's about the big picture, after all.

[Orema]

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

Yes, I'd allow it.

Whether or not world peace is on the table, if death is the only option if I don't allow them to have sex, then yes—have at it. But I'm timing it.

I just can't let my partner die over my jealousy and I"m so jealous even I have to laugh at myself sometimes.

[imperfect_cupcake]

Originally Posted by DapperButch

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

I'd like to point out that having an orgasm is a physical reaction and doesn't mean the other person is enjoying it. Many people can be forced to have an orgasm who don't want to or find what they are doing to be vile. Rape victims can be forced to have orgasms. They find it quite traumatic.

There was a twilight zone type program in the UK called the black mirror. In it the Priminister had to have sex with a pig until he orgasmed on public tv to prevent the death of a woman who was beloved by the nation. He did it. He vomited and sobbed after, but in the story he did it.

If my partner decided to sleep with someone vile to save people from dying I would do anything within my power to make them feel better after.

[DapperButch]

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

I'd like to point out that having an orgasm is a physical reaction and doesn't mean the other person is enjoying it. Many people can be forced to have an orgasm who don't want to or find what they are doing to be vile. Rape victims can be forced to have orgasms. They find it quite traumatic.

There was a twilight zone type program in the UK called the black mirror. In it the Priminister had to have sex with a pig until he orgasmed on public tv to prevent the death of a woman who was beloved by the nation. He did it. He vomited and sobbed after, but in the story he did it.

If my partner decided to sleep with someone vile to save people from dying I would do anything within my power to make them feel better after.

Yes, didn't think of it this way, absolutely. When you mentioned rape victims, it made me think of child abuse victims and how that issue really messes with one's head. It is physiological.