Would you?

[TruTexan]

My answer? UHM HELL NO. I don't play share the partner well.at.all.
I'll leave this one to IC to solve world peace with sex. LOL ( and I'm just kidding).

[bobbi46]

hmmmm tuff question .....

part of me says Yes ..For world peace .
But my real answer is No...i dont control her or i cant tell her what to do nor do i want to .but i did marry her..and thats for life ..so in my little mind she is mine and mine alone )

[imperfect_cupcake]

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

[job]

Absolutely. Even without the loved one's death, part added to it. World peace is kind of a big deal.

[TruTexan]

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

[~ocean]

sex for world peace ~ if hy wanted too i'd say go for it ~ after all it's only sex ~

[DapperButch]

Originally Posted by TruTexan

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written to all:

Really? It is world peace people!

Like, are people seriously saying that they would not be ok with their partner having sex with someone ONE TIME for WORLD PEACE?

I would even have sex with a cis male for world peace. I may vomit along the way and have bad memories to work through later, but I would do it!

PLUS, the world would be so grateful, and women would see me as hot for "sacrificing for the world", I could make up for anything nasty I had to do!

[imperfect_cupcake]

Originally Posted by TruTexan

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

So, what you are saying is, you'd prefer to let someone you love die (mum, dad, sibbling or best friend).

Ok. What if it's your partner? What if she will die? Would you prefer to let her die or to let someone else have sex with her for 15 minutes?

[JDeere]

World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.

[imperfect_cupcake]

Originally Posted by JDeere

World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.

JD would you watch your parents/best friend/your partner herself be blown up
Or
You partner have sex for 15 minutes

[Kobi]

Originally Posted by JDeere

World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.

Thank you for saying this. It is grounded in reality and I, for one, appreciate that.

I am not sure what the original question was supposed to gauge i.e. jealously levels; altruism levels; perceived "ownership" of a partner, their bodies and their decisions; people, especially women being expected to sacrifice themselves or others for the good of humankind; or to what lengths are you willing to go if world peace was even a reality.

If world peace was so simple as to be attained by one sexual encounter, given the sexual freedoms and sexual slavery we have today, we should be oozing peacefulness. But, people being people complicate even the simplest of things. And, love and sex have caused more wars than they have solved. Hence the reason I would want an iron clad, irrevocable contract.

But, back to fantasy land, if world peace was even possible, and if we changed the variable necessary to achieve it, one has to wonder if people would be so quick to jump on the bandwagon.

[TruTexan]

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

So, what you are saying is, you'd prefer to let someone you love die (mum, dad, sibbling or best friend).

Ok. What if it's your partner? What if she will die? Would you prefer to let her die or to let someone else have sex with her for 15 minutes?

It's not up to me, to LET anyone do anything. I said I don't share well with others, there's a lot of pain for me involving that very issue and I can't get past it. I'm sorry, my answer is still NO.

[imperfect_cupcake]

Originally Posted by TruTexan

It's not up to me, to LET anyone do anything. I said I don't share well with others, there's a lot of pain for me involving that very issue and I can't get past it. I'm sorry, my answer is still NO.

I totally agree with the letting thing. And I've had people cheat on me and it is painful. I don't see this as cheating or sharing, I suppose. In my head it's only "what someone would do to prevent death of someone I love."

To you it's something else. I'm not sure I understand because death of my mom would trump having to comfort my partner from having to have sex with an idiot (and I'd be buying them flowers and chocolates for the rest of my days in thanks for their selfless act of help) but I accept that somehow you see it different. I'd love to understand why someone would think that way but I won't ask as it appears to be a sore point.

Thanks for answering

[DapperButch]

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

[Smiling]

Originally Posted by DapperButch

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

It's a dirty job, but somebody's gotta do it. Since I don't have a partner, I'd personally take one for the team.

And if I did have a partner, would I "let" them sleep with someone else? I don't think it's my decision to make for anyone else. Partner or no - it isn't about "ownership." You do what you've gotta do and then I'll do likewise. Either we can get past it or we can't; but world peace!

It's about the big picture, after all.

[Orema]

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

Yes, I'd allow it.

Whether or not world peace is on the table, if death is the only option if I don't allow them to have sex, then yes—have at it. But I'm timing it.

I just can't let my partner die over my jealousy and I"m so jealous even I have to laugh at myself sometimes.

[Katniss]

Absolutely it would be ok with me. It's world peace for goodness sakes! Think about boarding a plane with no TSA screenings, not being worried about an idiot with a bomb in their backpack, shoe, or up their butt. Think of all the money saved on war that could be better spent on healthcare, sustainable energy, education, art and music! Matter of fact, for world peace even I'd sleep with my nemisis. Heck, make it a threesome and afterwards my real love and I can go get sea salt scrub downs, high 5 one another and split a cheesecake because we are now sexsuperheros!

As to an orgasm, that wouldn't bug me either. A few electrodes on the brain in the right place can achieve that too so why should I feel threatened?

Katniss

[imperfect_cupcake]

Originally Posted by DapperButch

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

I'd like to point out that having an orgasm is a physical reaction and doesn't mean the other person is enjoying it. Many people can be forced to have an orgasm who don't want to or find what they are doing to be vile. Rape victims can be forced to have orgasms. They find it quite traumatic.

There was a twilight zone type program in the UK called the black mirror. In it the Priminister had to have sex with a pig until he orgasmed on public tv to prevent the death of a woman who was beloved by the nation. He did it. He vomited and sobbed after, but in the story he did it.

If my partner decided to sleep with someone vile to save people from dying I would do anything within my power to make them feel better after.

[DapperButch]

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

I'd like to point out that having an orgasm is a physical reaction and doesn't mean the other person is enjoying it. Many people can be forced to have an orgasm who don't want to or find what they are doing to be vile. Rape victims can be forced to have orgasms. They find it quite traumatic.

There was a twilight zone type program in the UK called the black mirror. In it the Priminister had to have sex with a pig until he orgasmed on public tv to prevent the death of a woman who was beloved by the nation. He did it. He vomited and sobbed after, but in the story he did it.

If my partner decided to sleep with someone vile to save people from dying I would do anything within my power to make them feel better after.

Yes, didn't think of it this way, absolutely. When you mentioned rape victims, it made me think of child abuse victims and how that issue really messes with one's head. It is physiological.

[imperfect_cupcake]

Originally Posted by DapperButch

Yes, didn't think of it this way, absolutely. When you mentioned rape victims, it made me think of child abuse victims and how that issue really messes with one's head. It is physiological.

For sure.

Like I said, if someone I was partnered with chose to save the world by sleeping with someone vile, I'd do my very best to make them feel better afterwards. Cause it would really suck to have done that. And loving them, I'd want to help them recover and heal from it.

It totally makes me think of that black mirror episode