Would you?

bobbi46 · 01-21-2016, 10:44 PM

hmmmm tuff question .....

part of me says Yes ..For world peace .
But my real answer is No...i dont control her or i cant tell her what to do nor do i want to .but i did marry her..and thats for life ..so in my little mind she is mine and mine alone

)

imperfect_cupcake · 01-23-2016, 08:31 PM

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

job · 01-23-2016, 09:02 PM

Absolutely. Even without the loved one's death, part added to it. World peace is kind of a big deal.

TruTexan · 01-23-2016, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

~ocean · 01-23-2016, 11:28 PM

sex for world peace ~ if hy wanted too i'd say go for it ~ after all it's only sex ~

DapperButch · 01-24-2016, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TruTexan

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written to all:

Really? It is world peace people!

Like, are people seriously saying that they would not be ok with their partner having sex with someone ONE TIME for WORLD PEACE?

I would even have sex with a cis male for world peace. I may vomit along the way and have bad memories to work through later, but I would do it!

PLUS, the world would be so grateful, and women would see me as hot for "sacrificing for the world", I could make up for anything nasty I had to do!

imperfect_cupcake · 01-24-2016, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TruTexan

hmm, don't think I can do it. Just don't do the share well thing. Sorry.

So, what you are saying is, you'd prefer to let someone you love die (mum, dad, sibbling or best friend).

Ok. What if it's your partner? What if she will die? Would you prefer to let her die or to let someone else have sex with her for 15 minutes?

JDeere · 01-24-2016, 09:36 PM

World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.

imperfect_cupcake · 01-24-2016, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JDeere

World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.

JD would you watch your parents/best friend/your partner herself be blown up
Or
You partner have sex for 15 minutes

JDeere · 01-24-2016, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

JD would you watch your parents/best friend/your partner herself be blown up
Or
You partner have sex for 15 minutes

Yes I would rather die or have them die before I let them sleep with someone.

Again world peace will NEVER happen.

Again my opinion and feelings even if it's not part of the norm but I am not going to change how I feel just because I get crap for my posts.

Kobi · 01-25-2016, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JDeere

World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.

Thank you for saying this. It is grounded in reality and I, for one, appreciate that.

I am not sure what the original question was supposed to gauge i.e. jealously levels; altruism levels; perceived "ownership" of a partner, their bodies and their decisions; people, especially women being expected to sacrifice themselves or others for the good of humankind; or to what lengths are you willing to go if world peace was even a reality.

If world peace was so simple as to be attained by one sexual encounter, given the sexual freedoms and sexual slavery we have today, we should be oozing peacefulness. But, people being people complicate even the simplest of things. And, love and sex have caused more wars than they have solved. Hence the reason I would want an iron clad, irrevocable contract.

But, back to fantasy land, if world peace was even possible, and if we changed the variable necessary to achieve it, one has to wonder if people would be so quick to jump on the bandwagon.

imperfect_cupcake · 01-25-2016, 02:51 PM

I view these questions in line with "if you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be and why"

Obviously, I'm not a tree and I can never be turned into one. But its an imteresting question and I love playing the game "what if." Its a game I play often with partners:
"What if you could only communicate with a nose flute? How would you do that?"
People I generally get on with and have fun with come up with all kinds of different and creative answers.
People I tend not to click with tend to answer "thats stupid. Why would that even happen? Why are you even asking me this? It's nonsense."

It's a thought experiment. And people explain their choices.

TruTexan · 01-25-2016, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

So, what you are saying is, you'd prefer to let someone you love die (mum, dad, sibbling or best friend).

Ok. What if it's your partner? What if she will die? Would you prefer to let her die or to let someone else have sex with her for 15 minutes?

It's not up to me, to LET anyone do anything. I said I don't share well with others, there's a lot of pain for me involving that very issue and I can't get past it. I'm sorry, my answer is still NO.

imperfect_cupcake · 01-26-2016, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TruTexan

It's not up to me, to LET anyone do anything. I said I don't share well with others, there's a lot of pain for me involving that very issue and I can't get past it. I'm sorry, my answer is still NO.

I totally agree with the letting thing. And I've had people cheat on me and it is painful. I don't see this as cheating or sharing, I suppose. In my head it's only "what someone would do to prevent death of someone I love."

To you it's something else. I'm not sure I understand because death of my mom would trump having to comfort my partner from having to have sex with an idiot (and I'd be buying them flowers and chocolates for the rest of my days in thanks for their selfless act of help) but I accept that somehow you see it different. I'd love to understand why someone would think that way but I won't ask as it appears to be a sore point.

Thanks for answering

TruTexan · 01-26-2016, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

I totally agree with the letting thing. And I've had people cheat on me and it is painful. I don't see this as cheating or sharing, I suppose. In my head it's only "what someone would do to prevent death of someone I love."

To you it's something else. I'm not sure I understand because death of my mom would trump having to comfort my partner from having to have sex with an idiot (and I'd be buying them flowers and chocolates for the rest of my days in thanks for their selfless act of help) but I accept that somehow you see it different. I'd love to understand why someone would think that way but I won't ask as it appears to be a sore point.

Thanks for answering

It is very painful to talk about and thank you for recognizing that. I appreciate it. I don't want to discuss this any further and thank you for not asking me to.

DapperButch · 01-24-2016, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

Smiling · 01-24-2016, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DapperButch

I think it would be an even BETTER question if they have sex until your PARTNER orgasms.

I admit, that would be harder to do. Seeing my partner enjoying the experience, especially with someone I hate (but there really isn't anyone I know that I hate), then it would definitely move into more difficult emotional territory for me. But, yes, my answer is still the same.

It's a dirty job, but somebody's gotta do it. Since I don't have a partner, I'd personally take one for the team.

And if I did have a partner, would I "let" them sleep with someone else? I don't think it's my decision to make for anyone else. Partner or no - it isn't about "ownership." You do what you've gotta do and then I'll do likewise. Either we can get past it or we can't; but world peace!

It's about the big picture, after all.

Orema · 01-24-2016, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imperfect_cupcake

Ok, here's a twist on the question

Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm).

Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

Yes, I'd allow it.

Whether or not world peace is on the table, if death is the only option if I don't allow them to have sex, then yes—have at it. But I'm timing it.

I just can't let my partner die over my jealousy and I"m so jealous even I have to laugh at myself sometimes.

Katniss · 01-24-2016, 12:36 PM

Absolutely it would be ok with me. It's world peace for goodness sakes! Think about boarding a plane with no TSA screenings, not being worried about an idiot with a bomb in their backpack, shoe, or up their butt. Think of all the money saved on war that could be better spent on healthcare, sustainable energy, education, art and music! Matter of fact, for world peace even I'd sleep with my nemisis. Heck, make it a threesome and afterwards my real love and I can go get sea salt scrub downs, high 5 one another and split a cheesecake because we are now sexsuperheros!

As to an orgasm, that wouldn't bug me either. A few electrodes on the brain in the right place can achieve that too so why should I feel threatened?

Katniss

Kobi · 01-24-2016, 02:07 PM

To achieve world peace, would you let your significant other/ spouse sleep with your worst enemy?

Had to think this one over.

The premise is my partner sleeping with my worst enemy would achieve world peace. Logic dictates, that if this is true, then my partner and my worst enemy are both responsible for world disharmony. In this case, I would not only sanction the union, I would help them pack and move in together.

On the other hand, as a woman, I know the power of the p***y. As such, after negotiating an ironclad, irrevocable pre-coital agreement, it would be ok with me.

On the third hand, considering who I consider my worst enemy to be, I'm thinking my partners response to my agreeing, even for the sake of world peace, will be something along the lines of

Is there an easier question?

01-23-2016, 11:28 PM	#5
~ocean Infamous Member How Do You Identify?: femme blows a kiss off my finger tips * Preferred Pronoun?: ~ hey girl ~ Relationship Status: ~ single & content ~ Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Massachusetts ~coastal Posts: 7,905 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 22,958 Thanked 16,011 Times in 4,723 Posts Rep Power: 21474860	~ sex for world peace ~ if hy wanted too i'd say go for it ~ after all it's only sex ~ __________________ ~ Always, ocean

01-21-2016, 10:44 PM	#1
bobbi46 Junior Member How Do You Identify?: sporty, athlete Preferred Pronoun?: she/her/hey you Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: vancouver canada Posts: 25 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 110 Thanked 113 Times in 23 Posts Rep Power: 1718001	hmmmm tuff question ..... part of me says Yes ..For world peace . But my real answer is No...i dont control her or i cant tell her what to do nor do i want to .but i did marry her..and thats for life ..so in my little mind she is mine and mine alone )

01-23-2016, 08:31 PM	#2
imperfect_cupcake Senior Member How Do You Identify?: feminine dolly dyke Preferred Pronoun?: Your Grace Relationship Status: I put my own care first Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: In a gauze of mystery Posts: 1,776 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 2,426 Thanked 9,710 Times in 1,611 Posts Rep Power: 21474853	Ok, here's a twist on the question Same deal, but someone you love will die in a burning wreck of an explosion if your partner doesn't have sex with them for 15 minutes (till they, not your partner, reaches their orgasm). Do you let that person you love die in an explosion? Or does your partner have sex for 15 minutes?

01-23-2016, 09:02 PM	#3
job Junior Member How Do You Identify?: butch Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Vegas area Posts: 47 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 182 Thanked 159 Times in 35 Posts Rep Power: 644258	Absolutely. Even without the loved one's death, part added to it. World peace is kind of a big deal.

01-24-2016, 09:36 PM	#8
JDeere Practically Lives Here How Do You Identify?: Transgender Preferred Pronoun?: He/him/his Relationship Status: Single Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Oklahoma Posts: 17,752 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 31,018 Thanked 28,833 Times in 9,708 Posts Rep Power: 21474865	World peace will never happen so my answer is still NO even to the one that IC posted.

01-25-2016, 02:51 PM	#12
imperfect_cupcake Senior Member How Do You Identify?: feminine dolly dyke Preferred Pronoun?: Your Grace Relationship Status: I put my own care first Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: In a gauze of mystery Posts: 1,776 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 2,426 Thanked 9,710 Times in 1,611 Posts Rep Power: 21474853	I view these questions in line with "if you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be and why" Obviously, I'm not a tree and I can never be turned into one. But its an imteresting question and I love playing the game "what if." Its a game I play often with partners: "What if you could only communicate with a nose flute? How would you do that?" People I generally get on with and have fun with come up with all kinds of different and creative answers. People I tend not to click with tend to answer "thats stupid. Why would that even happen? Why are you even asking me this? It's nonsense." It's a thought experiment. And people explain their choices.

01-24-2016, 12:36 PM	#19
Katniss Senior Member How Do You Identify?: Dame, doll, twist, dish Preferred Pronoun?: Ladylike ones Relationship Status: ***** Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: We drink sweet tea here Posts: 2,903 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 6,654 Thanked 10,371 Times in 2,089 Posts Rep Power**: 21474851	Absolutely it would be ok with me. It's world peace for goodness sakes! Think about boarding a plane with no TSA screenings, not being worried about an idiot with a bomb in their backpack, shoe, or up their butt. Think of all the money saved on war that could be better spent on healthcare, sustainable energy, education, art and music! Matter of fact, for world peace even I'd sleep with my nemisis. Heck, make it a threesome and afterwards my real love and I can go get sea salt scrub downs, high 5 one another and split a cheesecake because we are now sexsuperheros! As to an orgasm, that wouldn't bug me either. A few electrodes on the brain in the right place can achieve that too so why should I feel threatened? Katniss

01-24-2016, 02:07 PM	#20
Kobi Infamous Member How Do You Identify?: Biological female. Lesbian. Relationship Status: Happy Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Hanging out in the Atlantic. Posts: 9,234 My Photo Gallery Thanks: 9,840 Thanked 34,611 Times in 7,637 Posts Rep Power: 21474860	To achieve world peace, would you let your significant other/ spouse sleep with your worst enemy? Had to think this one over. The premise is my partner sleeping with my worst enemy would achieve world peace. Logic dictates, that if this is true, then my partner and my worst enemy are both responsible for world disharmony. In this case, I would not only sanction the union, I would help them pack and move in together. On the other hand, as a woman, I know the power of the p***y. As such, after negotiating an ironclad, irrevocable pre-coital agreement, it would be ok with me. On the third hand, considering who I consider my worst enemy to be, I'm thinking my partners response to my agreeing, even for the sake of world peace, will be something along the lines of Is there an easier question?