![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Butch Preferred Pronoun?:
Meh... I'm not very particular about this. Relationship Status:
Single Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: The south... bleh!
Posts: 1,744
Thanks: 5,316
Thanked 5,113 Times in 1,504 Posts
Rep Power: 21474847 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I dug Avenatti when he first appeared but not so much many more. He seems very focused on self-aggrandizement. But … who knows... maybe it takes an egomaniac to beat an egomaniac. But … at least … maybe... he'll be our egomaniac??
lol |
|
|
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Lyte For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
How Do You Identify?:
Stonefemme lesbian Preferred Pronoun?:
I'm a woman. Behave accordingly. Relationship Status:
Single, not looking. Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,467
Thanks: 9,474
Thanked 7,107 Times in 1,204 Posts
Rep Power: 21474852 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
NOPE! That does not make someone a good Presidential candidate. This is the hardest job on earth, and the most powerful position on earth. The right person for this job is not someone whose primary qualification is their entertainment value. We're not electing someone to be a rock star, fer-fcks-sake. I think Warren is a great candidate, regardless of her missteps in the debate over her Native American ancestor. She lacks foreign policy experience, but so did Obama. I think Booker is another good prospect, though he's equally inexperienced in foreign policy. I think Biden is not the right one at this time. I'm not going to agree with everything that anyone has done or will do. But I think either Booker or Warren would be excellent choices.
__________________
Cheryl |
|
|
|
|
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to CherylNYC For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Femme Preferred Pronoun?:
She Relationship Status:
Free Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 96
Thanks: 34
Thanked 311 Times in 79 Posts
Rep Power: 2491088 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't think we're a mob that's angry enough! If we were as scary as the GOP says we are, they wouldn't be pulling any of this BS.
We need to go to the polls and vote - then, go to the White House like the villagers in an old Frankenstein movie. Enough. |
|
|
|
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to MaddieRobbie For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#4 |
|
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme *blows a kiss off my finger tips ** Preferred Pronoun?:
~ hey girl ~ Relationship Status:
~ single & content ~ Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Massachusetts ~coastal
Posts: 7,905
Thanks: 22,958
Thanked 16,012 Times in 4,723 Posts
Rep Power: 21474860 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm sick of the democrat and republican separatism.... it's OLD ….our senator Charles Baker of Massachusetts is a rare find in politics . He identifies as a republican ,although he doesn't seem like he is . I just find him an intelligent man with a very liberal outlook.
__________________
~ Always, ocean |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme *blows a kiss off my finger tips ** Preferred Pronoun?:
~ hey girl ~ Relationship Status:
~ single & content ~ Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Massachusetts ~coastal
Posts: 7,905
Thanks: 22,958
Thanked 16,012 Times in 4,723 Posts
Rep Power: 21474860 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
~ Always, ocean |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to ~ocean For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#6 |
|
Practically Lives Here
How Do You Identify?:
Butch Relationship Status:
..... Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: 30 minute ferry ride from Seattle
Posts: 38,565
Thanks: 20,811
Thanked 33,548 Times in 14,914 Posts
Rep Power: 21474890 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Who's any more of a angry mob than those republicans who start chanting "lock her up" at the drop of a hat..........
|
|
|
|
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to homoe For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#7 |
|
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
jenny Preferred Pronoun?:
babygirl Relationship Status:
First Lady of the United SMH Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,445
Thanks: 1,532
Thanked 26,553 Times in 4,688 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One of the best tweets i saw after The Incident on 11/9/2016 was "I'm the tea party now, motherf#@ckers"
The Republicans have never been scared of us before. I like them scared.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
| The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to dark_crystal For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
How Do You Identify?:
butch Preferred Pronoun?:
she her Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Blue girl in a red state
Posts: 242
Thanks: 2,050
Thanked 601 Times in 202 Posts
Rep Power: 21442095 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Never mind that Hillary was investigated out the yin yang by the FBI and legislative savants like Trey Gowdy, and no matter how many times they dragged her in and asked the same questions, there was never anything to pin on her. Period. Trump has locked up the three branches of the Federal government, so if his horseshit dog whistling about wanting to put Hillary in jail had any merit--wouldn't he have already had his justice department and all applicable agencies put together charges against her? No, because he knows she's not indictable, and the 'lock her up' chant is far more valuable to him, as long as his nitwit base is never reminded that they tried for years to get her, but there was no there there. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to WheatToast For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
|
|