Presidential Slugfest 2016 - Debate Watch Party!

[C0LLETTE]

Originally Posted by MsTinkerbelly

Hillary Clintin walks a fine line here. Hillary is a woman who fights for women, children and families...I think it would be the end of her campaign if it appears that she is using his children against him.

Sad as it is, Hillary is held to COMPLETELY different standards due to her gender.

But this is just my opinion.

She wouldn't be using his children against him. She would be exposing his ugly core. She isn't attacking his children she is exposing that his attitudes towards women extend even to sexualising his children.
She doesn't have to say it but her surrogates can....and I doubt anyone hearing it would conclude "poor Donald" look how she is pointing to how he talks about his daughter.

You really think people would turn away from her for pointing out what an abusive perverse parent he is?
And there are lots of indirect ways to make those references. That's why they have "surrogates".

[C0LLETTE]

I guess I just get tired of opponents taking slams from Trump and not slamming back. His primary opponents know how effective that was. He won.

I see no reason why HRC needs to back away from Trump's assessment of her as a "fighter".

She needs to slam him and slam him good . I think a lot of women ( and men) would like to see him on his ass and WHY WHY should she be afraid of offending his voters cause EVERYONE else already thinks he is a pig. It is time to Toss the Shit Back Into His Face rather than being bullied into backing off from offending HIS voters. I seriously doubt any undecided voters would side with him if her surrogates exposed his ugly comments about his daughter....

Think about it: yeah he said those horrid things about his daughter but she brought them up...I'm going to vote for him cause what she did is terrible. Hey and yeah, his daughter does have great "tits and ass". Go Donald.

[kittygrrl]

Apparently it was Trump's intention to seat the four women accusing Bill Clinton of sexual assault in the VIP box. This was blocked by the co-chairman of the debate committee Frank Fahrenkopf Jr., who told Trump if he tried to seat those women in that box he would have security remove them. Thank goddess someone who has no problem telling Trump no. A fait accompli-

[MsTinkerbelly]

Originally Posted by C0LLETTE

She wouldn't be using his children against him. She would be exposing his ugly core. She isn't attacking his children she is exposing that his attitudes towards women extend even to sexualising his children.
She doesn't have to say it but her surrogates can....and I doubt anyone hearing it would conclude "poor Donald" look how she is pointing to how he talks about his daughter.

You really think people would turn away from her for pointing out what an abusive perverse parent he is?
And there are lots of indirect ways to make those references. That's why they have "surrogates".

You need to read what I said without implying anything else.

I said SHE cannot bring up the issues of him sexualizing his daughter, or ANYTHING negative about his children. That doesn't mean a surrogate can't do it, it just means it cannot come from her mouth.

[C0LLETTE]

Originally Posted by MsTinkerbelly

You need to read what I said without implying anything else.

I said SHE cannot bring up the issues of him sexualizing his daughter, or ANYTHING negative about his children. That doesn't mean a surrogate can't do it, it just means it cannot come from her mouth.

As I hope you know, I like you very much MsTinkerbelly and on the vast majority of issues I agree with you however I do not agree that I "need" to do anything.

You did not refer to her "bringing up" the issue. You said it would be "the end of her campaign" if she appeared to "use it". Having the surrogates refer to it IS using it and, in my opinion, it would be a very good thing.

Personally, I think she'd lose nothing by directly confronting him but if surrogates are more acceptable...have at it. One direct hit right to the middle of his smug lying face wouldn't hurt her a bit.

[MsTinkerbelly]

Originally Posted by C0LLETTE

As I hope you know, I like you very much MsTinkerbelly and on the vast majority of issues I agree with you however I do not agree that I "need" to do anything.

You did not refer to her "bringing up" the issue. You said it would be "the end of her campaign" if she appeared to "use it". Having the surrogates refer to it IS using it and, in my opinion, it would be a very good thing.

Personally, I think she'd lose nothing by directly confronting him but if surrogates are more acceptable...have at it. One direct hit right to the middle of his smug lying face wouldn't hurt her a bit.

Well, in this, we will have to agree to disagree.