![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Do Business Owners Have the Right to Refuse Service Due to Moral/Religious Objections? | |||
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 25.00% |
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
38 | 63.33% |
Unsure/Maybe/Other |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 11.67% |
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
How Do You Identify?:
Satan in a Sunday Hat Preferred Pronoun?:
Maow Relationship Status:
Married Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Chemical Valley
Posts: 4,086
Thanks: 3,312
Thanked 8,738 Times in 2,565 Posts
Rep Power: 21474856 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
HSIN can correct me if I'm wrong (But I think I'm right about her question/intent since we've been chatting about it all last night and this morning too) but I do believe that what she was trying to discuss was:
- Is it okay to deny services to someone because of who they are (not because of what they do) - Even though sexual orientation is not an official protected group in many places, should we be afforded the same protections that people are afforded due to race and religion - If we should not be a protected group - should there be ANY protected groups? - Should religious people get a "pass" for discriminating against us because religion is also a protected class Did I miss anything, HSIN?
__________________
bête noire \bet-NWAHR\, noun: One that is particularly disliked or that is to be avoided.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to betenoire For This Useful Post: |
|
|