![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Do Business Owners Have the Right to Refuse Service Due to Moral/Religious Objections? | |||
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 25.00% |
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
38 | 63.33% |
Unsure/Maybe/Other |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 11.67% |
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#30 |
Infamous Member
How Do You Identify?:
femme Relationship Status:
attached Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,896
Thanks: 29,046
Thanked 13,094 Times in 3,386 Posts
Rep Power: 21474858 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Just b/c someone can go through the backdoor or find a loophole to defy existing protection laws, does that mean that they are not valuable and necessary?
For example, a company may not give the reason that they will not hire someone with a disability...they will say they don't meet the qualifications necessary for the job. Just b/c we know this unethical and illegal practice is still done, I still would not want people with disabilities to be excluded from Employment/Housing protections. |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Soon For This Useful Post: |
|
|